{"title":"在不同灌溉水平下,大豆的引入提高了玉米冠层和根系构型对光和水分利用的响应","authors":"Bo Jing, Wenjuan Shi, Tao Chen, Zhongmin Zhai","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07489-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Backgrounds</h3><p>Maize monoculture often leads to suboptimal light and water utilization, restricting productivity. Intercropping with soybean may enhance maize canopy and root traits, but its effectiveness under different irrigation levels remains unclear.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A two-year randomized block field trial was conducted in Northwestern China, with traditional maize monoculture as the control and maize/soybean intercropping systems introduced. Three irrigation levels (60%, 80%, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration) were set to evaluate maize productivity, canopy and root architecture, and light and water use efficiency under both monoculture and intercropping systems.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Result</h3><p>Results showed that intercropping increased cob length, cob diameter, and 100-grain weight of maize compared to monoculture, economic income of intercropping increased by 7.97% and 17.29% in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The intercropping improved the leaf angle and leaf area index of maize, while also promoting lateral root expansion of maize, leading to greater root dry weight and root length compared to monoculture, especially within the 0–20 cm soil layer. The intercropping enhanced the efficient utilization of light and water resources of maize, as evidenced by higher net photosynthetic rates and maximum photosynthetic quantum efficiency compared to monoculture, as well as greater water productivity. In addition, with increasing irrigation levels, improvements in the canopy, root, and light utilization of maize increased for both monoculture and intercropping, however, total water productivity exhibited a decreasing trend, particularly in intercropping.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>IMS combined with moderate irrigation (80% of crop evapotranspiration) optimized canopy and root coordination, enhancing both light and water use efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"9 38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing soybean into maize fields improves responses of maize canopy and root architecture to light and water utilization under different irrigation levels\",\"authors\":\"Bo Jing, Wenjuan Shi, Tao Chen, Zhongmin Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-025-07489-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Backgrounds</h3><p>Maize monoculture often leads to suboptimal light and water utilization, restricting productivity. Intercropping with soybean may enhance maize canopy and root traits, but its effectiveness under different irrigation levels remains unclear.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A two-year randomized block field trial was conducted in Northwestern China, with traditional maize monoculture as the control and maize/soybean intercropping systems introduced. Three irrigation levels (60%, 80%, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration) were set to evaluate maize productivity, canopy and root architecture, and light and water use efficiency under both monoculture and intercropping systems.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Result</h3><p>Results showed that intercropping increased cob length, cob diameter, and 100-grain weight of maize compared to monoculture, economic income of intercropping increased by 7.97% and 17.29% in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The intercropping improved the leaf angle and leaf area index of maize, while also promoting lateral root expansion of maize, leading to greater root dry weight and root length compared to monoculture, especially within the 0–20 cm soil layer. The intercropping enhanced the efficient utilization of light and water resources of maize, as evidenced by higher net photosynthetic rates and maximum photosynthetic quantum efficiency compared to monoculture, as well as greater water productivity. In addition, with increasing irrigation levels, improvements in the canopy, root, and light utilization of maize increased for both monoculture and intercropping, however, total water productivity exhibited a decreasing trend, particularly in intercropping.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>IMS combined with moderate irrigation (80% of crop evapotranspiration) optimized canopy and root coordination, enhancing both light and water use efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"9 38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07489-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07489-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introducing soybean into maize fields improves responses of maize canopy and root architecture to light and water utilization under different irrigation levels
Backgrounds
Maize monoculture often leads to suboptimal light and water utilization, restricting productivity. Intercropping with soybean may enhance maize canopy and root traits, but its effectiveness under different irrigation levels remains unclear.
Methods
A two-year randomized block field trial was conducted in Northwestern China, with traditional maize monoculture as the control and maize/soybean intercropping systems introduced. Three irrigation levels (60%, 80%, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration) were set to evaluate maize productivity, canopy and root architecture, and light and water use efficiency under both monoculture and intercropping systems.
Result
Results showed that intercropping increased cob length, cob diameter, and 100-grain weight of maize compared to monoculture, economic income of intercropping increased by 7.97% and 17.29% in 2023 and 2024, respectively. The intercropping improved the leaf angle and leaf area index of maize, while also promoting lateral root expansion of maize, leading to greater root dry weight and root length compared to monoculture, especially within the 0–20 cm soil layer. The intercropping enhanced the efficient utilization of light and water resources of maize, as evidenced by higher net photosynthetic rates and maximum photosynthetic quantum efficiency compared to monoculture, as well as greater water productivity. In addition, with increasing irrigation levels, improvements in the canopy, root, and light utilization of maize increased for both monoculture and intercropping, however, total water productivity exhibited a decreasing trend, particularly in intercropping.
Conclusions
IMS combined with moderate irrigation (80% of crop evapotranspiration) optimized canopy and root coordination, enhancing both light and water use efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.