Myriam R. Fernandez, Prabhath Lokuruge, Lobna Abdellatif, Noe Waelchli, Julia Y. Leeson, Francis Zvomuya, Mervin St. Luce
{"title":"半干旱的加拿大草原上采用有机间作的谷类作物及其各自的单一栽培","authors":"Myriam R. Fernandez, Prabhath Lokuruge, Lobna Abdellatif, Noe Waelchli, Julia Y. Leeson, Francis Zvomuya, Mervin St. Luce","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic crop production relies mostly on legumes for N input. Intercropping of organic legumes with more competitive crops might provide an alternative to the poor weed suppression and disease susceptibility of legumes. It might also be expected that such intercropping could be of benefit to crops grown in the subsequent year through increased N from the preceding intercropped legume, and lower weed growth due to the more competitive companion. The objective of this study, conducted under drier than average conditions in a semiarid region of the Canadian Prairies, was to determine how organic intercrops of legumes with a cereal or oilseed at different ratios would affect soil nutrients the next spring, weed levels, and the productivity and quality of the following durum wheat [<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Results from 2018 to 2019 showed that intercropping had a negligible impact on Olsen P and extractable K. Soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N (>15-cm deep) was lowest following the lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medik.)–mustard (<i>Sinapis alba</i> L.) intercrops and mustard monoculture, which was reflected in lower growth of the durum wheat. Conversely, some of the pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.)–oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) intercrops and the oat and all legume monocultures resulted in higher durum wheat biomass and grain yield, with their highest values observed after the checks summerfallow and forage pea manure. Weeds tended to have lower densities after the intercrops than the grain legume monocultures. Nutrient concentration in plant tissue suggested that weeds could be a greater source of soil nutrients than crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cereal crop following organic intercrops and their respective monocultures in the semiarid Canadian Prairie\",\"authors\":\"Myriam R. Fernandez, Prabhath Lokuruge, Lobna Abdellatif, Noe Waelchli, Julia Y. Leeson, Francis Zvomuya, Mervin St. Luce\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organic crop production relies mostly on legumes for N input. Intercropping of organic legumes with more competitive crops might provide an alternative to the poor weed suppression and disease susceptibility of legumes. It might also be expected that such intercropping could be of benefit to crops grown in the subsequent year through increased N from the preceding intercropped legume, and lower weed growth due to the more competitive companion. The objective of this study, conducted under drier than average conditions in a semiarid region of the Canadian Prairies, was to determine how organic intercrops of legumes with a cereal or oilseed at different ratios would affect soil nutrients the next spring, weed levels, and the productivity and quality of the following durum wheat [<i>Triticum turgidum</i> L. ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Results from 2018 to 2019 showed that intercropping had a negligible impact on Olsen P and extractable K. Soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N (>15-cm deep) was lowest following the lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medik.)–mustard (<i>Sinapis alba</i> L.) intercrops and mustard monoculture, which was reflected in lower growth of the durum wheat. Conversely, some of the pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.)–oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) intercrops and the oat and all legume monocultures resulted in higher durum wheat biomass and grain yield, with their highest values observed after the checks summerfallow and forage pea manure. Weeds tended to have lower densities after the intercrops than the grain legume monocultures. Nutrient concentration in plant tissue suggested that weeds could be a greater source of soil nutrients than crops.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70032\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有机作物生产主要依赖豆科植物的氮输入。有机豆科作物与竞争优势强的作物间作,可能为解决豆科作物抗杂草能力差和病害易感性差的问题提供一种选择。也可以预期,这种间作可能有利于作物第二年的生长,因为前间作豆科作物的氮素增加,并且由于更具竞争性的同伴而降低杂草的生长。本研究是在加拿大大草原半干旱地区比平均条件更干燥的条件下进行的,目的是确定豆类与谷物或油籽以不同比例有机间作如何影响明年春天的土壤养分,杂草水平以及后续硬粒小麦的生产力和质量。硬质(Desf)。Husn。]。结果表明,2018 - 2019年间作对土壤氮素磷和可提取钾的影响可以忽略不计。土壤NO3-N (15 cm深)在小扁豆(Lens culinaris Medik.) -芥菜(Sinapis alba L.)间作和芥菜单作后最低,这反映在硬粒小麦的生长较低。相反,部分豌豆-燕麦间作和燕麦-豆科单一栽培的硬粒小麦生物量和籽粒产量较高,且在夏休和饲用豆肥对照后达到最高值。间作后的杂草密度比单作豆科作物低。植物组织中的养分浓度表明,杂草可能是比作物更大的土壤养分来源。
Cereal crop following organic intercrops and their respective monocultures in the semiarid Canadian Prairie
Organic crop production relies mostly on legumes for N input. Intercropping of organic legumes with more competitive crops might provide an alternative to the poor weed suppression and disease susceptibility of legumes. It might also be expected that such intercropping could be of benefit to crops grown in the subsequent year through increased N from the preceding intercropped legume, and lower weed growth due to the more competitive companion. The objective of this study, conducted under drier than average conditions in a semiarid region of the Canadian Prairies, was to determine how organic intercrops of legumes with a cereal or oilseed at different ratios would affect soil nutrients the next spring, weed levels, and the productivity and quality of the following durum wheat [Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Results from 2018 to 2019 showed that intercropping had a negligible impact on Olsen P and extractable K. Soil NO3-N (>15-cm deep) was lowest following the lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)–mustard (Sinapis alba L.) intercrops and mustard monoculture, which was reflected in lower growth of the durum wheat. Conversely, some of the pea (Pisum sativum L.)–oat (Avena sativa L.) intercrops and the oat and all legume monocultures resulted in higher durum wheat biomass and grain yield, with their highest values observed after the checks summerfallow and forage pea manure. Weeds tended to have lower densities after the intercrops than the grain legume monocultures. Nutrient concentration in plant tissue suggested that weeds could be a greater source of soil nutrients than crops.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.