新型蒸汽一体化炭黑余热回收装置的技术经济与可持续性评价

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Ayeyemi Ajegunle, Peter Aigba, Olusegun D. Samuel, Joseph Oyekale, Benjamin U. Oreko, Christopher C. Enweremadu, Prabhu Paramasivam, Larry Orobome Agberegha, H. Fayaz
{"title":"新型蒸汽一体化炭黑余热回收装置的技术经济与可持续性评价","authors":"Ayeyemi Ajegunle,&nbsp;Peter Aigba,&nbsp;Olusegun D. Samuel,&nbsp;Joseph Oyekale,&nbsp;Benjamin U. Oreko,&nbsp;Christopher C. Enweremadu,&nbsp;Prabhu Paramasivam,&nbsp;Larry Orobome Agberegha,&nbsp;H. Fayaz","doi":"10.1155/er/6905764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This study investigates carbon black (CB) production challenges, including high energy usage and waste of heat sources, by proposing a waste heat energy recovery concept to increase the sustainability of this energy-intensive and environmentally impactful process. The research involves a novel integration of a steam power plant (STP) with an industrial CB plant (CBP) using Aspen Plus simulation software. Comparative exergetic performance analyses of the system were conducted with this tool, while the Engineering Equation Solver (EES) was used to evaluate the exergoeconomic modelling of the plant. Additionally, environmental sustainability indicators were determined. The integrated plant system delivered CB capacity of 1817 kg/s, converted 98.03% of CB feedstocks with a purification value of 99.25% and produced 195 MW of electricity, significantly improving plant efficiency. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies for the integrated system are computed as 98.75% and 80.40%, respectively, with the STP contributing to the overall plant improvement. About 50% of the produced exergy was destroyed, with the CB combustor accounting for 48% of the combined plant exergetic destruction. Despite a substantial waste–exergy ratio from CBP, the integration of the STP increased the system’s exergetic sustainability index (ESI) by 18%. The exergoeconomic analysis highlighted the highest cost of destruction in the combustor and evaluated the evaporator as the least exergoeconomic factor driver. Components with potential exergetic and cost destruction improvements were identified. In conclusion, integrating power generation units with CB production plants can markedly reduce thermal heat waste in the CBP and enhance integrated plant environmental performance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/6905764","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic and Sustainability Assessment of a Novel Waste Heat Recovery of Carbon Black Plant Integrated With a Steam Plant\",\"authors\":\"Ayeyemi Ajegunle,&nbsp;Peter Aigba,&nbsp;Olusegun D. Samuel,&nbsp;Joseph Oyekale,&nbsp;Benjamin U. Oreko,&nbsp;Christopher C. Enweremadu,&nbsp;Prabhu Paramasivam,&nbsp;Larry Orobome Agberegha,&nbsp;H. Fayaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/er/6905764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>This study investigates carbon black (CB) production challenges, including high energy usage and waste of heat sources, by proposing a waste heat energy recovery concept to increase the sustainability of this energy-intensive and environmentally impactful process. The research involves a novel integration of a steam power plant (STP) with an industrial CB plant (CBP) using Aspen Plus simulation software. Comparative exergetic performance analyses of the system were conducted with this tool, while the Engineering Equation Solver (EES) was used to evaluate the exergoeconomic modelling of the plant. Additionally, environmental sustainability indicators were determined. The integrated plant system delivered CB capacity of 1817 kg/s, converted 98.03% of CB feedstocks with a purification value of 99.25% and produced 195 MW of electricity, significantly improving plant efficiency. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies for the integrated system are computed as 98.75% and 80.40%, respectively, with the STP contributing to the overall plant improvement. About 50% of the produced exergy was destroyed, with the CB combustor accounting for 48% of the combined plant exergetic destruction. Despite a substantial waste–exergy ratio from CBP, the integration of the STP increased the system’s exergetic sustainability index (ESI) by 18%. The exergoeconomic analysis highlighted the highest cost of destruction in the combustor and evaluated the evaporator as the least exergoeconomic factor driver. Components with potential exergetic and cost destruction improvements were identified. In conclusion, integrating power generation units with CB production plants can markedly reduce thermal heat waste in the CBP and enhance integrated plant environmental performance.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/6905764\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/6905764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/6905764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过提出废热能源回收概念来研究炭黑(CB)生产挑战,包括高能耗和热源浪费,以提高这一能源密集型和环境影响过程的可持续性。该研究涉及使用Aspen Plus仿真软件将蒸汽发电厂(STP)与工业CB发电厂(CBP)进行新型集成。使用该工具对系统进行了比较火用性能分析,同时使用工程方程求解器(EES)来评估电厂的火用经济模型。此外,还确定了环境可持续性指标。综合装置系统提供的CB容量为1817 kg/s,转化率为98.03%,净化值为99.25%,发电量为195 MW,显著提高了装置效率。综合系统的总能量效率和火用效率分别为98.75%和80.40%,STP对整个工厂的改善做出了贡献。产生的火能中约有50%被破坏,其中CB燃烧器占联合工厂火能破坏的48%。尽管CBP的废物-火用比很高,但STP的集成使系统的火用可持续性指数(ESI)提高了18%。燃烧经济分析强调燃烧室的破坏成本最高,蒸发器是最小的燃烧经济因素驱动因素。确定了具有潜在的能量和成本破坏改进的组件。综上所述,发电机组与CB生产厂的整合可以显著减少CBP的热浪费,提高工厂的整体环境绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Techno-Economic and Sustainability Assessment of a Novel Waste Heat Recovery of Carbon Black Plant Integrated With a Steam Plant

Techno-Economic and Sustainability Assessment of a Novel Waste Heat Recovery of Carbon Black Plant Integrated With a Steam Plant

This study investigates carbon black (CB) production challenges, including high energy usage and waste of heat sources, by proposing a waste heat energy recovery concept to increase the sustainability of this energy-intensive and environmentally impactful process. The research involves a novel integration of a steam power plant (STP) with an industrial CB plant (CBP) using Aspen Plus simulation software. Comparative exergetic performance analyses of the system were conducted with this tool, while the Engineering Equation Solver (EES) was used to evaluate the exergoeconomic modelling of the plant. Additionally, environmental sustainability indicators were determined. The integrated plant system delivered CB capacity of 1817 kg/s, converted 98.03% of CB feedstocks with a purification value of 99.25% and produced 195 MW of electricity, significantly improving plant efficiency. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies for the integrated system are computed as 98.75% and 80.40%, respectively, with the STP contributing to the overall plant improvement. About 50% of the produced exergy was destroyed, with the CB combustor accounting for 48% of the combined plant exergetic destruction. Despite a substantial waste–exergy ratio from CBP, the integration of the STP increased the system’s exergetic sustainability index (ESI) by 18%. The exergoeconomic analysis highlighted the highest cost of destruction in the combustor and evaluated the evaporator as the least exergoeconomic factor driver. Components with potential exergetic and cost destruction improvements were identified. In conclusion, integrating power generation units with CB production plants can markedly reduce thermal heat waste in the CBP and enhance integrated plant environmental performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信