给蜜蜂还是不给蜜蜂:大蜜蜂有时会引导人类去找蜜蜂以外的动物,但可能不是作为惩罚

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
David J. Lloyd-Jones, Musaji Muamedi, Claire N. Spottiswoode
{"title":"给蜜蜂还是不给蜜蜂:大蜜蜂有时会引导人类去找蜜蜂以外的动物,但可能不是作为惩罚","authors":"David J. Lloyd-Jones,&nbsp;Musaji Muamedi,&nbsp;Claire N. Spottiswoode","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Greater honeyguides (<i>Indicator indicator</i>) are well known to guide human honey hunters to wild bees' nests in exchange for beeswax as food. Centuries of African Indigenous accounts have intriguingly reported that honeyguides occasionally guide humans to animals other than bees, typically large animals dangerous to humans. This is interpreted by some human cultures as punishment for prior failure to reward the bird, and by others as an altruistic warning behavior. Here, we present quantitative evidence from hundreds of honeyguide-human interactions in Mozambique of greater honeyguides guiding humans to snakes (<i>n</i> = 3) and a dead mammal (<i>n</i> = 1). We show that guiding behavior to these vertebrates was (i) spatially and acoustically analogous to honeyguide behavior when guiding to bees, (ii) did not occur more frequently after not being rewarded with beeswax by humans, and (iii) was rare (3.7% of human-honeyguide interactions in 1 year; 0% in others). We review historical accounts and cultural explanations for this behavior and use these to inform five hypotheses for why honeyguides guide people to nonbee animals. Our field data were most consistent with the hypothesis that guiding to nonbee animals results from a cognitive recall error of spatial information. We suggest that this behavior is unlikely to function as punishment, yet may coincidentally benefit honeyguides over longer timescales by initiating a human cultural interpretation that reinforces human cultural traditions of rewarding honeyguides with beeswax.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Bees or Not to Bees: Greater Honeyguides Sometimes Guide Humans to Animals Other Than Bees, but Likely Not as Punishment\",\"authors\":\"David J. Lloyd-Jones,&nbsp;Musaji Muamedi,&nbsp;Claire N. Spottiswoode\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.71136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Greater honeyguides (<i>Indicator indicator</i>) are well known to guide human honey hunters to wild bees' nests in exchange for beeswax as food. Centuries of African Indigenous accounts have intriguingly reported that honeyguides occasionally guide humans to animals other than bees, typically large animals dangerous to humans. This is interpreted by some human cultures as punishment for prior failure to reward the bird, and by others as an altruistic warning behavior. Here, we present quantitative evidence from hundreds of honeyguide-human interactions in Mozambique of greater honeyguides guiding humans to snakes (<i>n</i> = 3) and a dead mammal (<i>n</i> = 1). We show that guiding behavior to these vertebrates was (i) spatially and acoustically analogous to honeyguide behavior when guiding to bees, (ii) did not occur more frequently after not being rewarded with beeswax by humans, and (iii) was rare (3.7% of human-honeyguide interactions in 1 year; 0% in others). We review historical accounts and cultural explanations for this behavior and use these to inform five hypotheses for why honeyguides guide people to nonbee animals. Our field data were most consistent with the hypothesis that guiding to nonbee animals results from a cognitive recall error of spatial information. We suggest that this behavior is unlikely to function as punishment, yet may coincidentally benefit honeyguides over longer timescales by initiating a human cultural interpretation that reinforces human cultural traditions of rewarding honeyguides with beeswax.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71136\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71136\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大导蜜䴕(指示器指示器)是众所周知的引导人类蜂蜜猎人到野生蜜蜂的巢穴,以换取蜂蜡作为食物。几个世纪以来,非洲土著居民有趣地报告说,蜜䴕偶尔会引导人类找到蜜蜂以外的动物,通常是对人类有危险的大型动物。在一些人类文化中,这被解释为对先前未能奖励鸟的惩罚,而在另一些人看来,这是一种利他主义的警告行为。在这里,我们提供了来自莫桑比克数百个蜜蜂与人类互动的定量证据,这些蜜蜂引导人类找到蛇(n = 3)和一只死亡的哺乳动物(n = 1)。我们发现,对这些脊椎动物的引导行为(i)在空间和声学上与导蜜䴕在引导蜜蜂时的行为相似,(ii)在没有得到人类蜂蜡的奖励后不会更频繁地发生,(iii)很少(1年内人类与导蜜䴕的互动为3.7%;其他国家为0%)。我们回顾了这种行为的历史记录和文化解释,并利用这些来说明为什么导蜜䴕引导人们去找非蜜蜂动物的五种假设。我们的现场数据与引导非蜜蜂动物的假设最一致,这是由于空间信息的认知回忆错误造成的。我们认为,这种行为不太可能是一种惩罚,但在更长的时间尺度上,它可能巧合地有利于蜜䴕,因为它启动了一种人类文化解释,强化了人类用蜂蜡奖励蜜䴕的文化传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

To Bees or Not to Bees: Greater Honeyguides Sometimes Guide Humans to Animals Other Than Bees, but Likely Not as Punishment

To Bees or Not to Bees: Greater Honeyguides Sometimes Guide Humans to Animals Other Than Bees, but Likely Not as Punishment

Greater honeyguides (Indicator indicator) are well known to guide human honey hunters to wild bees' nests in exchange for beeswax as food. Centuries of African Indigenous accounts have intriguingly reported that honeyguides occasionally guide humans to animals other than bees, typically large animals dangerous to humans. This is interpreted by some human cultures as punishment for prior failure to reward the bird, and by others as an altruistic warning behavior. Here, we present quantitative evidence from hundreds of honeyguide-human interactions in Mozambique of greater honeyguides guiding humans to snakes (n = 3) and a dead mammal (n = 1). We show that guiding behavior to these vertebrates was (i) spatially and acoustically analogous to honeyguide behavior when guiding to bees, (ii) did not occur more frequently after not being rewarded with beeswax by humans, and (iii) was rare (3.7% of human-honeyguide interactions in 1 year; 0% in others). We review historical accounts and cultural explanations for this behavior and use these to inform five hypotheses for why honeyguides guide people to nonbee animals. Our field data were most consistent with the hypothesis that guiding to nonbee animals results from a cognitive recall error of spatial information. We suggest that this behavior is unlikely to function as punishment, yet may coincidentally benefit honeyguides over longer timescales by initiating a human cultural interpretation that reinforces human cultural traditions of rewarding honeyguides with beeswax.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信