“他们在互相交谈,但不是在对我说话”:检查患者从医院到熟练护理机构过渡期间不良经历的驱动因素

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
James D. Harrison, Margaret C. Fang, Rebecca L. Sudore, Andrew D. Auerbach, Tasce Bongiovanni, Audrey Lyndon
{"title":"“他们在互相交谈,但不是在对我说话”:检查患者从医院到熟练护理机构过渡期间不良经历的驱动因素","authors":"James D. Harrison,&nbsp;Margaret C. Fang,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Sudore,&nbsp;Andrew D. Auerbach,&nbsp;Tasce Bongiovanni,&nbsp;Audrey Lyndon","doi":"10.1111/hex.70248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Hospital-to-skilled nursing facility (SNF) transitions have been characterised as fragmented and having poor quality. The drivers, or the factors and actions, that directly lead to these poor experiences are not well described. It is essential to understand the drivers of these experiences so that specific improvement targets can be identified. This study aimed to generate a theory of contributing factors that determine patient and caregiver experiences during the transition from the hospital to SNF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a grounded theory study on the Medicine Service at an academic medical centre (AMC) and a short-term rehabilitation SNF. We conducted individual in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers and clinicians, as well as ethnographic observations of hospital and SNF care activities. We analysed data using dimensional analysis to create an explanatory matrix that identified prominent dimensions and considered the context, conditions and processes that result in patient and caregiver consequences and experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We completed 41 interviews (15 patients, 5 caregivers and 15 AMC and 6 SNF clinicians) and 40 h of ethnographic observations. ‘They were talking to each other, but not to me’ was the dimension with the greatest explanatory power regarding patient and caregiver experience. Patients and caregivers consistently felt disconnected from their care teams and lacked sufficient information leading to uncertainty about their SNF admission and plans for recovery. Key conditions driving these outcomes were patient and care team processes, including interdisciplinary team-based care, clinical training and practice norms, pressure to maintain hospital throughput, patient behaviours, the availability and provision of information, and patient's physical and emotional vulnerability. The relationships between conditions and processes were complex, dynamic and, at times, interrelated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study has conceptualised the root causes of poor-quality experiences within the hospital-to-SNF care transition. Our theory generation identifies targets for clinical practice improvement, tailored intervention development and medical education innovations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>We partnered with the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient and Family Advisory Council during all stages of this study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70248","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘They Were Talking to Each Other but Not to Me’: Examining the Drivers of Patients' Poor Experiences During the Transition From the Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility\",\"authors\":\"James D. Harrison,&nbsp;Margaret C. Fang,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Sudore,&nbsp;Andrew D. Auerbach,&nbsp;Tasce Bongiovanni,&nbsp;Audrey Lyndon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hospital-to-skilled nursing facility (SNF) transitions have been characterised as fragmented and having poor quality. The drivers, or the factors and actions, that directly lead to these poor experiences are not well described. It is essential to understand the drivers of these experiences so that specific improvement targets can be identified. This study aimed to generate a theory of contributing factors that determine patient and caregiver experiences during the transition from the hospital to SNF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a grounded theory study on the Medicine Service at an academic medical centre (AMC) and a short-term rehabilitation SNF. We conducted individual in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers and clinicians, as well as ethnographic observations of hospital and SNF care activities. We analysed data using dimensional analysis to create an explanatory matrix that identified prominent dimensions and considered the context, conditions and processes that result in patient and caregiver consequences and experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We completed 41 interviews (15 patients, 5 caregivers and 15 AMC and 6 SNF clinicians) and 40 h of ethnographic observations. ‘They were talking to each other, but not to me’ was the dimension with the greatest explanatory power regarding patient and caregiver experience. Patients and caregivers consistently felt disconnected from their care teams and lacked sufficient information leading to uncertainty about their SNF admission and plans for recovery. Key conditions driving these outcomes were patient and care team processes, including interdisciplinary team-based care, clinical training and practice norms, pressure to maintain hospital throughput, patient behaviours, the availability and provision of information, and patient's physical and emotional vulnerability. The relationships between conditions and processes were complex, dynamic and, at times, interrelated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study has conceptualised the root causes of poor-quality experiences within the hospital-to-SNF care transition. Our theory generation identifies targets for clinical practice improvement, tailored intervention development and medical education innovations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>We partnered with the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient and Family Advisory Council during all stages of this study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70248\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从医院到熟练护理机构(SNF)的转变具有碎片化和质量差的特点。直接导致这些糟糕体验的驱动因素或因素和行为并没有得到很好的描述。了解这些经验的驱动因素是至关重要的,这样可以确定具体的改进目标。本研究的目的是产生一个理论的贡献因素,决定患者和护理人员的经验,从医院过渡到SNF。方法对某学术医疗中心(AMC)的医学服务和短期康复SNF进行扎根理论研究。我们对患者、护理人员和临床医生进行了个人深度访谈,并对医院和SNF护理活动进行了人种学观察。我们使用量纲分析来分析数据,以创建一个解释性矩阵,该矩阵确定了突出的维度,并考虑了导致患者和护理人员后果和经历的背景、条件和过程。结果共完成41次访谈(15名患者、5名护理人员、15名AMC和6名SNF临床医生)和40小时的人种学观察。“他们在彼此交谈,但不是在对我说话”是最能解释病人和护理人员经历的维度。患者和护理人员始终感到与他们的护理团队脱节,缺乏足够的信息,导致他们对SNF入院和康复计划的不确定性。驱动这些结果的关键条件是患者和护理团队流程,包括跨学科团队护理、临床培训和实践规范、维持医院吞吐量的压力、患者行为、信息的可用性和提供,以及患者的身体和情感脆弱性。条件和过程之间的关系是复杂的、动态的,有时是相互关联的。结论本研究概念化了医院到snf护理过渡中低质量体验的根本原因。我们的理论生成确定了临床实践改进,量身定制的干预发展和医学教育创新的目标。在本研究的所有阶段,我们都与医院医学再造网络(HOMERuN)患者和家属咨询委员会合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘They Were Talking to Each Other but Not to Me’: Examining the Drivers of Patients' Poor Experiences During the Transition From the Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility

‘They Were Talking to Each Other but Not to Me’: Examining the Drivers of Patients' Poor Experiences During the Transition From the Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility

Introduction

Hospital-to-skilled nursing facility (SNF) transitions have been characterised as fragmented and having poor quality. The drivers, or the factors and actions, that directly lead to these poor experiences are not well described. It is essential to understand the drivers of these experiences so that specific improvement targets can be identified. This study aimed to generate a theory of contributing factors that determine patient and caregiver experiences during the transition from the hospital to SNF.

Methods

We conducted a grounded theory study on the Medicine Service at an academic medical centre (AMC) and a short-term rehabilitation SNF. We conducted individual in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers and clinicians, as well as ethnographic observations of hospital and SNF care activities. We analysed data using dimensional analysis to create an explanatory matrix that identified prominent dimensions and considered the context, conditions and processes that result in patient and caregiver consequences and experiences.

Results

We completed 41 interviews (15 patients, 5 caregivers and 15 AMC and 6 SNF clinicians) and 40 h of ethnographic observations. ‘They were talking to each other, but not to me’ was the dimension with the greatest explanatory power regarding patient and caregiver experience. Patients and caregivers consistently felt disconnected from their care teams and lacked sufficient information leading to uncertainty about their SNF admission and plans for recovery. Key conditions driving these outcomes were patient and care team processes, including interdisciplinary team-based care, clinical training and practice norms, pressure to maintain hospital throughput, patient behaviours, the availability and provision of information, and patient's physical and emotional vulnerability. The relationships between conditions and processes were complex, dynamic and, at times, interrelated.

Conclusion

This study has conceptualised the root causes of poor-quality experiences within the hospital-to-SNF care transition. Our theory generation identifies targets for clinical practice improvement, tailored intervention development and medical education innovations.

Patient or Public Contribution

We partnered with the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN) Patient and Family Advisory Council during all stages of this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信