Rui Xavier Dos Santos, Jan Waelkens, Abbe H. Crawford, Sam Khan, Sara Sami, Sergio A. Gomes, Anouk Van Ham, Iris Van Soens, Ine Cornelis, Jake Canning, Joe Fenn, Patrick Waters, Sofie F. M. Bhatti, An E. Vanhaesebrouck
{"title":"犬重症肌无力病例系列:考虑血清阴性犬的分类方法","authors":"Rui Xavier Dos Santos, Jan Waelkens, Abbe H. Crawford, Sam Khan, Sara Sami, Sergio A. Gomes, Anouk Van Ham, Iris Van Soens, Ine Cornelis, Jake Canning, Joe Fenn, Patrick Waters, Sofie F. M. Bhatti, An E. Vanhaesebrouck","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is categorized into several subgroups, including seronegative MG. Seronegative human patients are well documented, but seronegative dogs remain clinically uncharacterized and their prevalence unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of canine MG subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred sixty-seven owner-owned dogs diagnosed with MG from three referral centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective case series. We classified myasthenic dogs into subgroups, adhering to human guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We classified 167 dogs into four subgroups: acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized (49.7%, <i>n</i> = 83/167), focal (19.2%, <i>n</i> = 32/167) and thymoma-associated MG (9%, <i>n</i> = 15/167) and seronegative MG (22.2%, <i>n</i> = 37/167). Dogs with thymoma-associated MG were older (median 102 months; Interquartile Range (IQR) 96–120; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and seronegative dogs were younger (median 30 months; IQR 11.5–66; <i>p</i> = 0.017), compared to the generalized subgroup (median 67 months; IQR 36–96). Seronegative dogs presented less frequently with megaesophagus, compared to the generalized subgroup (63.8% vs. 85.7%; Odds Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 1.4–8.9; <i>p</i> = 0.025). Myasthenic dogs' survival time was significantly reduced when thymoma (Hazard Ratio (H.R.) 3.7; 95% C.I. 1.4–9.9; <i>p</i> = 0.028) or esophageal weakness (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 2.0–7.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) was present. Conversely, a higher likelihood of remission was achieved when esophageal weakness was absent (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 1.4–10.0; <i>p</i> = 0.007).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs with seronegative MG are more common than previously reported. Myasthenic subgroups differ in presentation and outcome, with esophageal weakness key to survival and remission. Diagnostic tests for seronegative dogs and effective treatments for esophageal weakness in myasthenic dogs are urgently needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Series of Canine Myasthenia Gravis: A Classification Approach With Consideration of Seronegative Dogs\",\"authors\":\"Rui Xavier Dos Santos, Jan Waelkens, Abbe H. Crawford, Sam Khan, Sara Sami, Sergio A. Gomes, Anouk Van Ham, Iris Van Soens, Ine Cornelis, Jake Canning, Joe Fenn, Patrick Waters, Sofie F. M. Bhatti, An E. Vanhaesebrouck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.70113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is categorized into several subgroups, including seronegative MG. Seronegative human patients are well documented, but seronegative dogs remain clinically uncharacterized and their prevalence unknown.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of canine MG subgroups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred sixty-seven owner-owned dogs diagnosed with MG from three referral centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective case series. We classified myasthenic dogs into subgroups, adhering to human guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We classified 167 dogs into four subgroups: acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized (49.7%, <i>n</i> = 83/167), focal (19.2%, <i>n</i> = 32/167) and thymoma-associated MG (9%, <i>n</i> = 15/167) and seronegative MG (22.2%, <i>n</i> = 37/167). Dogs with thymoma-associated MG were older (median 102 months; Interquartile Range (IQR) 96–120; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and seronegative dogs were younger (median 30 months; IQR 11.5–66; <i>p</i> = 0.017), compared to the generalized subgroup (median 67 months; IQR 36–96). Seronegative dogs presented less frequently with megaesophagus, compared to the generalized subgroup (63.8% vs. 85.7%; Odds Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 1.4–8.9; <i>p</i> = 0.025). Myasthenic dogs' survival time was significantly reduced when thymoma (Hazard Ratio (H.R.) 3.7; 95% C.I. 1.4–9.9; <i>p</i> = 0.028) or esophageal weakness (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 2.0–7.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) was present. Conversely, a higher likelihood of remission was achieved when esophageal weakness was absent (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 1.4–10.0; <i>p</i> = 0.007).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion and Clinical Importance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dogs with seronegative MG are more common than previously reported. Myasthenic subgroups differ in presentation and outcome, with esophageal weakness key to survival and remission. Diagnostic tests for seronegative dogs and effective treatments for esophageal weakness in myasthenic dogs are urgently needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70113\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Case Series of Canine Myasthenia Gravis: A Classification Approach With Consideration of Seronegative Dogs
Background
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is categorized into several subgroups, including seronegative MG. Seronegative human patients are well documented, but seronegative dogs remain clinically uncharacterized and their prevalence unknown.
Objectives
This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of canine MG subgroups.
Animals
One hundred sixty-seven owner-owned dogs diagnosed with MG from three referral centers.
Methods
Retrospective case series. We classified myasthenic dogs into subgroups, adhering to human guidelines.
Results
We classified 167 dogs into four subgroups: acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized (49.7%, n = 83/167), focal (19.2%, n = 32/167) and thymoma-associated MG (9%, n = 15/167) and seronegative MG (22.2%, n = 37/167). Dogs with thymoma-associated MG were older (median 102 months; Interquartile Range (IQR) 96–120; p < 0.001) and seronegative dogs were younger (median 30 months; IQR 11.5–66; p = 0.017), compared to the generalized subgroup (median 67 months; IQR 36–96). Seronegative dogs presented less frequently with megaesophagus, compared to the generalized subgroup (63.8% vs. 85.7%; Odds Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 1.4–8.9; p = 0.025). Myasthenic dogs' survival time was significantly reduced when thymoma (Hazard Ratio (H.R.) 3.7; 95% C.I. 1.4–9.9; p = 0.028) or esophageal weakness (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 2.0–7.0; p < 0.001) was present. Conversely, a higher likelihood of remission was achieved when esophageal weakness was absent (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 1.4–10.0; p = 0.007).
Conclusion and Clinical Importance
Dogs with seronegative MG are more common than previously reported. Myasthenic subgroups differ in presentation and outcome, with esophageal weakness key to survival and remission. Diagnostic tests for seronegative dogs and effective treatments for esophageal weakness in myasthenic dogs are urgently needed.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.