箱形涵洞中挡板结构、堵塞和水流变化对下游冲刷的实验研究

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Andaz Mohammed Rasul, Kaywan Othman Ahmed, Jamil Bahrami, Mohsen Isari, Muhammed Raza Kavian pour, Younes Aminpour, Farhad Faghihi, Miklas Scholz, Chaitanya Baliram Pande
{"title":"箱形涵洞中挡板结构、堵塞和水流变化对下游冲刷的实验研究","authors":"Andaz Mohammed Rasul,&nbsp;Kaywan Othman Ahmed,&nbsp;Jamil Bahrami,&nbsp;Mohsen Isari,&nbsp;Muhammed Raza Kavian pour,&nbsp;Younes Aminpour,&nbsp;Farhad Faghihi,&nbsp;Miklas Scholz,&nbsp;Chaitanya Baliram Pande","doi":"10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research utilized physical models to examine changes at the culvert outlet under diverse scenarios, including three different designs of baffle configurations, different levels of blockage, and flow discharges during both steady and unsteady flow states. The study assessed a box culvert with three outlets of different baffle arrangements and blockage rates of 0%, 25%, and 50% at the inlet. For unsteady flow conditions, two hydrographs were created, each containing seven unique flow discharges. Conversely, for steady flow conditions, flow rates of 13.8 <i>l/s</i> and 20 <i>l/s</i> were employed. The sediment and flow scenarios were meticulously chosen to maintain clear water throughout the experimental procedures. According to the findings, the scour patterns under both steady and unsteady flow conditions, as well as the effectiveness of the baffle in minimizing scour depths, were compared with the base case scenario at different blockage levels at culvert outlets. In-depth analysis of baffles application versus the base case scenario under the same blockage conditions showed that the deepest scour depths were typically found further from the outlet in the base case scenario. During steady flow conditions, the first design configuration of baffle reduced the deepest scour depth by 29.87% at a flow rate of 20 l<i>/s</i> with 25% blockage and configuration three was most effective at 37.70% reduction for 13.8 l<i>/s</i> with no inlet blockage. In unsteady flow conditions, during the first hydrograph, the first design configuration reduced the deepest scour depth by 37.33% at 25% blockage, while configuration two achieved a 34.48% reduction during the second hydrograph with 25% blockage. However, with baffles introduced, the greatest scour depth occurred much closer to the outlet. Additionally, an increase in flow rate resulted in larger scour holes, and scouring intensified with incremental increases in hydrograph steps. Nevertheless, an increase in blockage did not consistently result in a proportional increase in scour depth across all instances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigation of baffle configurations, blockage, and flow variability on downstream scour in box culverts\",\"authors\":\"Andaz Mohammed Rasul,&nbsp;Kaywan Othman Ahmed,&nbsp;Jamil Bahrami,&nbsp;Mohsen Isari,&nbsp;Muhammed Raza Kavian pour,&nbsp;Younes Aminpour,&nbsp;Farhad Faghihi,&nbsp;Miklas Scholz,&nbsp;Chaitanya Baliram Pande\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research utilized physical models to examine changes at the culvert outlet under diverse scenarios, including three different designs of baffle configurations, different levels of blockage, and flow discharges during both steady and unsteady flow states. The study assessed a box culvert with three outlets of different baffle arrangements and blockage rates of 0%, 25%, and 50% at the inlet. For unsteady flow conditions, two hydrographs were created, each containing seven unique flow discharges. Conversely, for steady flow conditions, flow rates of 13.8 <i>l/s</i> and 20 <i>l/s</i> were employed. The sediment and flow scenarios were meticulously chosen to maintain clear water throughout the experimental procedures. According to the findings, the scour patterns under both steady and unsteady flow conditions, as well as the effectiveness of the baffle in minimizing scour depths, were compared with the base case scenario at different blockage levels at culvert outlets. In-depth analysis of baffles application versus the base case scenario under the same blockage conditions showed that the deepest scour depths were typically found further from the outlet in the base case scenario. During steady flow conditions, the first design configuration of baffle reduced the deepest scour depth by 29.87% at a flow rate of 20 l<i>/s</i> with 25% blockage and configuration three was most effective at 37.70% reduction for 13.8 l<i>/s</i> with no inlet blockage. In unsteady flow conditions, during the first hydrograph, the first design configuration reduced the deepest scour depth by 37.33% at 25% blockage, while configuration two achieved a 34.48% reduction during the second hydrograph with 25% blockage. However, with baffles introduced, the greatest scour depth occurred much closer to the outlet. Additionally, an increase in flow rate resulted in larger scour holes, and scouring intensified with incremental increases in hydrograph steps. Nevertheless, an increase in blockage did not consistently result in a proportional increase in scour depth across all instances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02455-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用物理模型研究了不同情况下涵洞出口的变化,包括三种不同设计的挡板配置,不同程度的阻塞,以及稳定和非稳定流动状态下的流量。该研究评估了一个箱形涵洞,该涵洞有三个不同挡板布置的出口,入口堵塞率分别为0%、25%和50%。对于非定常流条件,创建了两个水流曲线,每个水流曲线包含七个独特的流量。相反,在稳定流动条件下,流速分别为13.8 l/s和20 l/s。在整个实验过程中,泥沙和水流场景都经过精心选择,以保持水的清澈。根据研究结果,比较了涵洞出口不同堵塞水平下的基本情况下,稳定和非稳定流动条件下的冲刷模式,以及挡板最小化冲刷深度的有效性。对相同堵塞条件下挡板的应用与基本情况的深入分析表明,在基本情况下,最深的冲刷深度通常在离出口更远的地方发现。在稳定流动条件下,在流速为20 l/s、堵塞率为25%的情况下,挡流板的第一种设计构型将最深冲刷深度降低了29.87%,而第三种设计构型在无进口堵塞、流速为13.8 l/s的情况下最有效,将最深冲刷深度降低了37.70%。在非定常工况下,第一种设计构型在25%堵塞情况下,将最深冲刷深度降低了37.33%,而第二种设计构型在25%堵塞情况下,将最深冲刷深度降低了34.48%。然而,随着挡板的引入,最大的冲刷深度发生在离出口更近的地方。此外,流量的增加导致冲刷孔的增大,冲刷随水流阶数的增加而加剧。然而,在所有实例中,堵塞的增加并不总是导致冲刷深度成比例地增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental investigation of baffle configurations, blockage, and flow variability on downstream scour in box culverts

This research utilized physical models to examine changes at the culvert outlet under diverse scenarios, including three different designs of baffle configurations, different levels of blockage, and flow discharges during both steady and unsteady flow states. The study assessed a box culvert with three outlets of different baffle arrangements and blockage rates of 0%, 25%, and 50% at the inlet. For unsteady flow conditions, two hydrographs were created, each containing seven unique flow discharges. Conversely, for steady flow conditions, flow rates of 13.8 l/s and 20 l/s were employed. The sediment and flow scenarios were meticulously chosen to maintain clear water throughout the experimental procedures. According to the findings, the scour patterns under both steady and unsteady flow conditions, as well as the effectiveness of the baffle in minimizing scour depths, were compared with the base case scenario at different blockage levels at culvert outlets. In-depth analysis of baffles application versus the base case scenario under the same blockage conditions showed that the deepest scour depths were typically found further from the outlet in the base case scenario. During steady flow conditions, the first design configuration of baffle reduced the deepest scour depth by 29.87% at a flow rate of 20 l/s with 25% blockage and configuration three was most effective at 37.70% reduction for 13.8 l/s with no inlet blockage. In unsteady flow conditions, during the first hydrograph, the first design configuration reduced the deepest scour depth by 37.33% at 25% blockage, while configuration two achieved a 34.48% reduction during the second hydrograph with 25% blockage. However, with baffles introduced, the greatest scour depth occurred much closer to the outlet. Additionally, an increase in flow rate resulted in larger scour holes, and scouring intensified with incremental increases in hydrograph steps. Nevertheless, an increase in blockage did not consistently result in a proportional increase in scour depth across all instances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信