{"title":"城市代谢研究的测绘机构。基于代理人参与程度的城市级资源利用评估模型的系统特征","authors":"Ehsan Ahmadian, Daniela Perrotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For several years, industrial, social, and urban ecology have contributed to developing, testing, and validating city-scale modelling tools that help understand society-nature relationships through energy and material exchanges. These tools can track and represent metabolic processes from different perspectives while handling increasingly complex datasets. However, few studies have examined how urban metabolism models incorporate different forms of agency deployed by actors in resource management. Additionally, reviews comparing modelling approaches across disciplines in urban metabolism research remain limited. To address these gaps, this study explores whether and to what extent urban-level modelling traditions in industrial, social, and urban ecology can systematically represent how agents influence metabolic stocks and flows. First, a systematic literature review of urban metabolism studies focusing on computational and mathematical models is conducted across these three disciplines. Second, models are compared based on how they engage with the concept of “agency” and represent metabolic agents in the modelling process. Finally, a systematic characterisation of these models is provided, highlighting their differences and complementarities in addressing agency. The results show that MFA is the most comprehensive model, applied across all disciplines and engagement levels with nine different terms for “agents,” whereas SD, WB, CA, and EFA are the least comprehensive, limited to a single discipline and one agent term at one level. This characterisation provides a foundation for developing integrated decision-making frameworks for selecting and coupling models in future urban metabolism research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"506 ","pages":"Article 111140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping agency in urban metabolism research. A systematic characterisation of urban-level resource-use assessment models based on levels of engagement with agents\",\"authors\":\"Ehsan Ahmadian, Daniela Perrotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For several years, industrial, social, and urban ecology have contributed to developing, testing, and validating city-scale modelling tools that help understand society-nature relationships through energy and material exchanges. These tools can track and represent metabolic processes from different perspectives while handling increasingly complex datasets. However, few studies have examined how urban metabolism models incorporate different forms of agency deployed by actors in resource management. Additionally, reviews comparing modelling approaches across disciplines in urban metabolism research remain limited. To address these gaps, this study explores whether and to what extent urban-level modelling traditions in industrial, social, and urban ecology can systematically represent how agents influence metabolic stocks and flows. First, a systematic literature review of urban metabolism studies focusing on computational and mathematical models is conducted across these three disciplines. Second, models are compared based on how they engage with the concept of “agency” and represent metabolic agents in the modelling process. Finally, a systematic characterisation of these models is provided, highlighting their differences and complementarities in addressing agency. The results show that MFA is the most comprehensive model, applied across all disciplines and engagement levels with nine different terms for “agents,” whereas SD, WB, CA, and EFA are the least comprehensive, limited to a single discipline and one agent term at one level. This characterisation provides a foundation for developing integrated decision-making frameworks for selecting and coupling models in future urban metabolism research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"506 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001255\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mapping agency in urban metabolism research. A systematic characterisation of urban-level resource-use assessment models based on levels of engagement with agents
For several years, industrial, social, and urban ecology have contributed to developing, testing, and validating city-scale modelling tools that help understand society-nature relationships through energy and material exchanges. These tools can track and represent metabolic processes from different perspectives while handling increasingly complex datasets. However, few studies have examined how urban metabolism models incorporate different forms of agency deployed by actors in resource management. Additionally, reviews comparing modelling approaches across disciplines in urban metabolism research remain limited. To address these gaps, this study explores whether and to what extent urban-level modelling traditions in industrial, social, and urban ecology can systematically represent how agents influence metabolic stocks and flows. First, a systematic literature review of urban metabolism studies focusing on computational and mathematical models is conducted across these three disciplines. Second, models are compared based on how they engage with the concept of “agency” and represent metabolic agents in the modelling process. Finally, a systematic characterisation of these models is provided, highlighting their differences and complementarities in addressing agency. The results show that MFA is the most comprehensive model, applied across all disciplines and engagement levels with nine different terms for “agents,” whereas SD, WB, CA, and EFA are the least comprehensive, limited to a single discipline and one agent term at one level. This characterisation provides a foundation for developing integrated decision-making frameworks for selecting and coupling models in future urban metabolism research.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).