Brooke H. Wolfe , Olivia Watson , Elizabeth A. Hintz
{"title":"预测、体验和回应被剥夺公民权的谈话:1型糖尿病患者的经历","authors":"Brooke H. Wolfe , Olivia Watson , Elizabeth A. Hintz","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 118099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticipating, experiencing, and responding to disenfranchising talk: The experiences of people with type 1 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Brooke H. Wolfe , Olivia Watson , Elizabeth A. Hintz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004290\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anticipating, experiencing, and responding to disenfranchising talk: The experiences of people with type 1 diabetes
This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.