预测、体验和回应被剥夺公民权的谈话:1型糖尿病患者的经历

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Brooke H. Wolfe , Olivia Watson , Elizabeth A. Hintz
{"title":"预测、体验和回应被剥夺公民权的谈话:1型糖尿病患者的经历","authors":"Brooke H. Wolfe ,&nbsp;Olivia Watson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Hintz","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 118099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticipating, experiencing, and responding to disenfranchising talk: The experiences of people with type 1 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Brooke H. Wolfe ,&nbsp;Olivia Watson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Hintz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004290\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本解释性研究应用交际(dis)授权理论分析了290篇由诊断为1型糖尿病(T1D)患者撰写的叙事。使用主题共现分析,我们确定了预期和经验(非)授权谈话(DT)类型之间和之间的相互关系以及参与者对DT的反应。具体来说,参与者预期缺乏理解,被指责为寻求同情或管理T1D无能。参与者经历了来自医疗保健提供者的压力、不必要的入侵、财务障碍和消极的自言自语。参与者通过否认、向他人学习和创造授权信息来回应DT。利用数据矩阵工具,我们确定了DT类型和响应类型之间的两种理论关系-无法管理T1D与经历他人不必要的入侵之间的关系,以及财务障碍与创造授权信息之间的关系。我们为T1D患者及其家人、医疗保健提供者和公共卫生官员提供理论启示和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticipating, experiencing, and responding to disenfranchising talk: The experiences of people with type 1 diabetes
This interpretive study applies the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement to analyze 290 narratives authored by people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Using thematic co-occurrence analysis, we identified interrelationships both among and across types of anticipated and experienced (dis)enfranchising talk (DT) and participants’ responses to DT. Specifically, participants anticipated a lack of understanding and being accused of seeking pity or being incompetent in managing T1D. Participants experienced pressure from healthcare providers, unwanted intrusions, financial barriers, and negative self-talk. Participants responded to DT via denial, learning from others, and creating enfranchising messages. Utilizing a data matrix tool, we identify two theoretical relationships across types of DT and types of responses – a relationship between inability to manage T1D and experiencing unwanted intrusions from others, and between financial barriers and creating enfranchising messages. We offer theoretical implications and practical suggestions for people with T1D and their families, healthcare providers, and public health officials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信