钠离子电池多尺度热失控分析及与锂离子电池的安全性比较评价

IF 12.7 1区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ping Ping , Xiantong Ren , Depeng Kong , Wei Gao , Yue Zhang , Can Yang , Gongquan Wang , Zhenkai Feng , Jiaxin Guo , Jinyong Ren
{"title":"钠离子电池多尺度热失控分析及与锂离子电池的安全性比较评价","authors":"Ping Ping ,&nbsp;Xiantong Ren ,&nbsp;Depeng Kong ,&nbsp;Wei Gao ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Can Yang ,&nbsp;Gongquan Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenkai Feng ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Guo ,&nbsp;Jinyong Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a burgeoning alternative to traditional energy storage, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) offer distinct advantages for large-scale energy storage due to their cost-effectiveness. However, knowledge gaps of the safety of SIBs still remain. This paper addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive analysis of the thermal and explosion hazards of SIBs with Na<sub>x</sub>NiFeMnO<sub>2</sub> (NFM) cathodes, compared with similar capacity lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) and LiNi<sub>x</sub>Co<sub>y</sub>Mn<sub>1-x-y</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NCM) batteries, using an accelerated calorimeter. Additionally, differential scanning calorimetry is employed to probe the heat sources in the thermal runaway (TR) processes of SIBs. Results indicate that the self-heating temperature and TR occurrence temperature of the NFM cell are 55.02 °C and 215.81 °C, respectively, with a mass loss ratio is close to that of NCM cell, posing a high explosion severity. Gas chromatography revealed similar gas compositions to LIBs, with a notable CH<sub>4</sub> concentration. The lower and upper explosive limits for NFM cells are calculated to be 5.18 % and 30.48 %, respectively. The explosion limit range for NFM cells falls between those of NCM and LFP cells. Eight key parameters corresponding to the likelihood and severity of the thermal and explosive hazards are considered, to establish multiscale safety assessment. The overall risk of TR can be ranked as: NCM &gt; NFM &gt; LFP cells. However, the NFM cells showed lower tolerance to side reactions and slightly lower explosive hazards compared to NCM cells. This study provides guidance for designing high-safety SIBs and offers a novel safety assessment framework for secondary batteries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10660,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part B: Engineering","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 112532"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-scale thermal runaway analysis of sodium-ion batteries and comparative safety assessment with lithium-ion batteries\",\"authors\":\"Ping Ping ,&nbsp;Xiantong Ren ,&nbsp;Depeng Kong ,&nbsp;Wei Gao ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Can Yang ,&nbsp;Gongquan Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenkai Feng ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Guo ,&nbsp;Jinyong Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As a burgeoning alternative to traditional energy storage, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) offer distinct advantages for large-scale energy storage due to their cost-effectiveness. However, knowledge gaps of the safety of SIBs still remain. This paper addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive analysis of the thermal and explosion hazards of SIBs with Na<sub>x</sub>NiFeMnO<sub>2</sub> (NFM) cathodes, compared with similar capacity lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) and LiNi<sub>x</sub>Co<sub>y</sub>Mn<sub>1-x-y</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NCM) batteries, using an accelerated calorimeter. Additionally, differential scanning calorimetry is employed to probe the heat sources in the thermal runaway (TR) processes of SIBs. Results indicate that the self-heating temperature and TR occurrence temperature of the NFM cell are 55.02 °C and 215.81 °C, respectively, with a mass loss ratio is close to that of NCM cell, posing a high explosion severity. Gas chromatography revealed similar gas compositions to LIBs, with a notable CH<sub>4</sub> concentration. The lower and upper explosive limits for NFM cells are calculated to be 5.18 % and 30.48 %, respectively. The explosion limit range for NFM cells falls between those of NCM and LFP cells. Eight key parameters corresponding to the likelihood and severity of the thermal and explosive hazards are considered, to establish multiscale safety assessment. The overall risk of TR can be ranked as: NCM &gt; NFM &gt; LFP cells. However, the NFM cells showed lower tolerance to side reactions and slightly lower explosive hazards compared to NCM cells. This study provides guidance for designing high-safety SIBs and offers a novel safety assessment framework for secondary batteries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part B: Engineering\",\"volume\":\"302 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part B: Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825004330\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part B: Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825004330","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钠离子电池(sib)作为一种新兴的储能技术,由于其成本效益,在大规模储能方面具有明显的优势。然而,关于sib安全性的知识差距仍然存在。本文通过使用加速量热计,对NaxNiFeMnO2 (NFM)阴极的sib与类似容量的锂离子电池(lib)、LiFePO4 (LFP)和LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 (NCM)电池的热和爆炸危险进行了全面分析,解决了这些空白。此外,采用差示扫描量热法对sib热失控过程中的热源进行了探测。结果表明,NFM电池的自热温度和TR发生温度分别为55.02℃和215.81℃,质量损失率接近NCM电池,具有较高的爆炸严重性。气相色谱分析显示,与lib相似的气体组成,具有显著的CH4浓度。NFM电池的爆炸下限和上限分别为5.18%和30.48%。NFM电池的爆炸极限范围介于NCM和LFP电池之间。考虑了与热爆危险的可能性和严重程度相对应的8个关键参数,建立了多尺度安全评价。TR的整体风险可分为:NCM >;NFM祝辞锂离子电池。然而,与NCM细胞相比,NFM细胞对副反应的耐受性较低,爆炸危险性略低。该研究为高安全性sib的设计提供了指导,并提供了一种新的二次电池安全评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-scale thermal runaway analysis of sodium-ion batteries and comparative safety assessment with lithium-ion batteries

Multi-scale thermal runaway analysis of sodium-ion batteries and comparative safety assessment with lithium-ion batteries
As a burgeoning alternative to traditional energy storage, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) offer distinct advantages for large-scale energy storage due to their cost-effectiveness. However, knowledge gaps of the safety of SIBs still remain. This paper addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive analysis of the thermal and explosion hazards of SIBs with NaxNiFeMnO2 (NFM) cathodes, compared with similar capacity lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 (NCM) batteries, using an accelerated calorimeter. Additionally, differential scanning calorimetry is employed to probe the heat sources in the thermal runaway (TR) processes of SIBs. Results indicate that the self-heating temperature and TR occurrence temperature of the NFM cell are 55.02 °C and 215.81 °C, respectively, with a mass loss ratio is close to that of NCM cell, posing a high explosion severity. Gas chromatography revealed similar gas compositions to LIBs, with a notable CH4 concentration. The lower and upper explosive limits for NFM cells are calculated to be 5.18 % and 30.48 %, respectively. The explosion limit range for NFM cells falls between those of NCM and LFP cells. Eight key parameters corresponding to the likelihood and severity of the thermal and explosive hazards are considered, to establish multiscale safety assessment. The overall risk of TR can be ranked as: NCM > NFM > LFP cells. However, the NFM cells showed lower tolerance to side reactions and slightly lower explosive hazards compared to NCM cells. This study provides guidance for designing high-safety SIBs and offers a novel safety assessment framework for secondary batteries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part B: Engineering
Composites Part B: Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
24.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
784
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part B: Engineering is a journal that publishes impactful research of high quality on composite materials. This research is supported by fundamental mechanics and materials science and engineering approaches. The targeted research can cover a wide range of length scales, ranging from nano to micro and meso, and even to the full product and structure level. The journal specifically focuses on engineering applications that involve high performance composites. These applications can range from low volume and high cost to high volume and low cost composite development. The main goal of the journal is to provide a platform for the prompt publication of original and high quality research. The emphasis is on design, development, modeling, validation, and manufacturing of engineering details and concepts. The journal welcomes both basic research papers and proposals for review articles. Authors are encouraged to address challenges across various application areas. These areas include, but are not limited to, aerospace, automotive, and other surface transportation. The journal also covers energy-related applications, with a focus on renewable energy. Other application areas include infrastructure, off-shore and maritime projects, health care technology, and recreational products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信