Golam Rabbani, Christina Smeaton, Mumtaz Cheema, Lakshman Galagedara
{"title":"电磁感应传感器评价与估算北方灰化壤土壤养分浓度","authors":"Golam Rabbani, Christina Smeaton, Mumtaz Cheema, Lakshman Galagedara","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring the spatial variability of soil properties by intrusive methods can be complicated and time-consuming; nevertheless, digital mapping of apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) can assist in the investigation of shallow podzol soils. We hypothesized that EC<sub>a</sub> measured as a soil proxy using electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors can be used to estimate spatiotemporal variability of soil nutrients. This study evaluated the relationship between EC<sub>a</sub> and selected soil nutrients (ammonium – NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, nitrate – NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and orthophosphate – PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>) and developed regression models to predict those nutrients. Multi-coil (MC) and multi-frequency (MF) EMI sensors were selected to predict nutrients within two land uses (grassland – GL and agricultural land – AL). The study revealed that MC-EMI responded statistically significantly (p-value < 0.05) relative to MF-EMI to correlate with soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>. Although highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were observed between EC<sub>a</sub> values and nutrients, simple linear regression (SLR) models suggested nutrients did not effectively explain the EC<sub>a</sub> variations (low coefficient of determination and high root mean square error). Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were more effective than SLR in representing EC<sub>a</sub> with the inclusion of saturation percentage and bulk density with each nutrient. MC EMI-based MLR models provided better nutrient predictions than the MF EMI sensor, possibly due to the sensor’s sampling depth differences and sensitivity to moisture availability in the soil. The study also revealed that if textural variability and organic matter content remain temporally stable, soil water content acts as the main driving factor for both EC<sub>a</sub> and nutrient variability. While these results suggest the potential use of EMI sensors to rapidly assess the spatial and temporal variability of podzol soil nutrients; further research on different agronomic treatments and their effect on EC<sub>a</sub> and soil nutrient relation is required to improve nutrient prediction accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 110448"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and estimation of boreal podzol soil nutrient concentrations using electromagnetic induction sensors\",\"authors\":\"Golam Rabbani, Christina Smeaton, Mumtaz Cheema, Lakshman Galagedara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Monitoring the spatial variability of soil properties by intrusive methods can be complicated and time-consuming; nevertheless, digital mapping of apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) can assist in the investigation of shallow podzol soils. We hypothesized that EC<sub>a</sub> measured as a soil proxy using electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors can be used to estimate spatiotemporal variability of soil nutrients. This study evaluated the relationship between EC<sub>a</sub> and selected soil nutrients (ammonium – NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, nitrate – NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and orthophosphate – PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>) and developed regression models to predict those nutrients. Multi-coil (MC) and multi-frequency (MF) EMI sensors were selected to predict nutrients within two land uses (grassland – GL and agricultural land – AL). The study revealed that MC-EMI responded statistically significantly (p-value < 0.05) relative to MF-EMI to correlate with soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>. Although highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were observed between EC<sub>a</sub> values and nutrients, simple linear regression (SLR) models suggested nutrients did not effectively explain the EC<sub>a</sub> variations (low coefficient of determination and high root mean square error). Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were more effective than SLR in representing EC<sub>a</sub> with the inclusion of saturation percentage and bulk density with each nutrient. MC EMI-based MLR models provided better nutrient predictions than the MF EMI sensor, possibly due to the sensor’s sampling depth differences and sensitivity to moisture availability in the soil. The study also revealed that if textural variability and organic matter content remain temporally stable, soil water content acts as the main driving factor for both EC<sub>a</sub> and nutrient variability. While these results suggest the potential use of EMI sensors to rapidly assess the spatial and temporal variability of podzol soil nutrients; further research on different agronomic treatments and their effect on EC<sub>a</sub> and soil nutrient relation is required to improve nutrient prediction accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992500554X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992500554X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation and estimation of boreal podzol soil nutrient concentrations using electromagnetic induction sensors
Monitoring the spatial variability of soil properties by intrusive methods can be complicated and time-consuming; nevertheless, digital mapping of apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) can assist in the investigation of shallow podzol soils. We hypothesized that ECa measured as a soil proxy using electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors can be used to estimate spatiotemporal variability of soil nutrients. This study evaluated the relationship between ECa and selected soil nutrients (ammonium – NH4+, nitrate – NO3− and orthophosphate – PO43−) and developed regression models to predict those nutrients. Multi-coil (MC) and multi-frequency (MF) EMI sensors were selected to predict nutrients within two land uses (grassland – GL and agricultural land – AL). The study revealed that MC-EMI responded statistically significantly (p-value < 0.05) relative to MF-EMI to correlate with soil NH4+, NO3− and PO43−. Although highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were observed between ECa values and nutrients, simple linear regression (SLR) models suggested nutrients did not effectively explain the ECa variations (low coefficient of determination and high root mean square error). Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were more effective than SLR in representing ECa with the inclusion of saturation percentage and bulk density with each nutrient. MC EMI-based MLR models provided better nutrient predictions than the MF EMI sensor, possibly due to the sensor’s sampling depth differences and sensitivity to moisture availability in the soil. The study also revealed that if textural variability and organic matter content remain temporally stable, soil water content acts as the main driving factor for both ECa and nutrient variability. While these results suggest the potential use of EMI sensors to rapidly assess the spatial and temporal variability of podzol soil nutrients; further research on different agronomic treatments and their effect on ECa and soil nutrient relation is required to improve nutrient prediction accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.