推进颅内动脉瘤检测:深度学习模型性能、临床整合和未来方向的综合系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Niloufar Delfan , Fatemeh Abbasi , Negar Emamzadeh , Amirmohammad Bahri , Mansour Parvaresh Rizi , Alireza Motamedi , Behzad Moshiri , Arad Iranmehr
{"title":"推进颅内动脉瘤检测:深度学习模型性能、临床整合和未来方向的综合系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Niloufar Delfan ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Abbasi ,&nbsp;Negar Emamzadeh ,&nbsp;Amirmohammad Bahri ,&nbsp;Mansour Parvaresh Rizi ,&nbsp;Alireza Motamedi ,&nbsp;Behzad Moshiri ,&nbsp;Arad Iranmehr","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cerebral aneurysms pose a significant risk to patient safety, particularly when ruptured, emphasizing the need for early detection and accurate prediction. Traditional diagnostic methods, reliant on clinician-based evaluations, face challenges in sensitivity and consistency, prompting the exploration of deep learning (DL) systems for improved performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the performance of DL models in detecting and predicting intracranial aneurysms compared to clinician-based evaluations. Imaging modalities included CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA). Data on lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and the impact of DL assistance on clinician performance were analyzed. Subgroup analyses evaluated DL sensitivity by aneurysm size and location, and interrater agreement was measured using Fleiss’ κ.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DL systems achieved an overall lesion-wise sensitivity of 90 % and specificity of 94 %, outperforming human diagnostics. Clinician specificity improved significantly with DL assistance, increasing from 83 % to 85 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 93 % to 95 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Similarly, clinician sensitivity also showed notable improvement with DL assistance, rising from 82 % to 96 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 82 % to 88 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Subgroup analysis showed DL sensitivity varied with aneurysm size and location, reaching 100 % for aneurysms larger than 10 mm. Additionally, DL assistance improved interrater agreement among clinicians, with Fleiss’ κ increasing from 0.668 to 0.862.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DL models demonstrate transformative potential in managing cerebral aneurysms by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, reducing missed cases, and supporting clinical decision-making. However, further validation in diverse clinical settings and seamless integration into standard workflows are necessary to fully realize the benefits of DL-driven diagnostics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 111243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Intracranial Aneurysm Detection: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Deep Learning Models Performance, Clinical Integration, and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Niloufar Delfan ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Abbasi ,&nbsp;Negar Emamzadeh ,&nbsp;Amirmohammad Bahri ,&nbsp;Mansour Parvaresh Rizi ,&nbsp;Alireza Motamedi ,&nbsp;Behzad Moshiri ,&nbsp;Arad Iranmehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cerebral aneurysms pose a significant risk to patient safety, particularly when ruptured, emphasizing the need for early detection and accurate prediction. Traditional diagnostic methods, reliant on clinician-based evaluations, face challenges in sensitivity and consistency, prompting the exploration of deep learning (DL) systems for improved performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the performance of DL models in detecting and predicting intracranial aneurysms compared to clinician-based evaluations. Imaging modalities included CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA). Data on lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and the impact of DL assistance on clinician performance were analyzed. Subgroup analyses evaluated DL sensitivity by aneurysm size and location, and interrater agreement was measured using Fleiss’ κ.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DL systems achieved an overall lesion-wise sensitivity of 90 % and specificity of 94 %, outperforming human diagnostics. Clinician specificity improved significantly with DL assistance, increasing from 83 % to 85 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 93 % to 95 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Similarly, clinician sensitivity also showed notable improvement with DL assistance, rising from 82 % to 96 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 82 % to 88 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Subgroup analysis showed DL sensitivity varied with aneurysm size and location, reaching 100 % for aneurysms larger than 10 mm. Additionally, DL assistance improved interrater agreement among clinicians, with Fleiss’ κ increasing from 0.668 to 0.862.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DL models demonstrate transformative potential in managing cerebral aneurysms by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, reducing missed cases, and supporting clinical decision-making. However, further validation in diverse clinical settings and seamless integration into standard workflows are necessary to fully realize the benefits of DL-driven diagnostics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825002152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825002152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑动脉瘤对患者安全构成重大风险,特别是在破裂时,强调早期发现和准确预测的必要性。传统的诊断方法依赖于基于临床医生的评估,在敏感性和一致性方面面临挑战,这促使人们探索深度学习(DL)系统以提高性能。方法本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了DL模型在检测和预测颅内动脉瘤方面的性能,并与临床评估进行了比较。成像方式包括CT血管造影(CTA)、数字减影血管造影(DSA)和飞行时间磁共振血管造影(TOF-MRA)。我们分析了病变敏感性、特异性以及DL辅助对临床医生表现的影响。亚组分析通过动脉瘤大小和位置评估DL的敏感性,并使用Fleiss ' κ来衡量相互间的一致性。结果dl系统的总体病变敏感性为90%,特异性为94%,优于人类诊断。在DL辅助下,临床医生的特异性显著提高,在患者情况下从83%增加到85%,在病变情况下从93%增加到95%。同样,临床医生的敏感性在DL辅助下也显示出显著的改善,在患者情况下从82%上升到96%,在病变情况下从82%上升到88%。亚组分析显示DL敏感性随动脉瘤大小和位置的不同而不同,对于大于10mm的动脉瘤可达100%。此外,DL辅助提高了临床医生之间的一致性,Fleiss ' κ从0.668增加到0.862。结论sdl模型通过提高诊断准确性、减少漏诊病例和支持临床决策,在脑动脉瘤治疗中具有变革性潜力。然而,为了充分实现dl驱动诊断的优势,需要在不同的临床环境中进一步验证并无缝集成到标准工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Intracranial Aneurysm Detection: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Deep Learning Models Performance, Clinical Integration, and Future Directions

Background

Cerebral aneurysms pose a significant risk to patient safety, particularly when ruptured, emphasizing the need for early detection and accurate prediction. Traditional diagnostic methods, reliant on clinician-based evaluations, face challenges in sensitivity and consistency, prompting the exploration of deep learning (DL) systems for improved performance.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the performance of DL models in detecting and predicting intracranial aneurysms compared to clinician-based evaluations. Imaging modalities included CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA). Data on lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and the impact of DL assistance on clinician performance were analyzed. Subgroup analyses evaluated DL sensitivity by aneurysm size and location, and interrater agreement was measured using Fleiss’ κ.

Results

DL systems achieved an overall lesion-wise sensitivity of 90 % and specificity of 94 %, outperforming human diagnostics. Clinician specificity improved significantly with DL assistance, increasing from 83 % to 85 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 93 % to 95 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Similarly, clinician sensitivity also showed notable improvement with DL assistance, rising from 82 % to 96 % in the patient-wise scenario and from 82 % to 88 % in the lesion-wise scenario. Subgroup analysis showed DL sensitivity varied with aneurysm size and location, reaching 100 % for aneurysms larger than 10 mm. Additionally, DL assistance improved interrater agreement among clinicians, with Fleiss’ κ increasing from 0.668 to 0.862.

Conclusions

DL models demonstrate transformative potential in managing cerebral aneurysms by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, reducing missed cases, and supporting clinical decision-making. However, further validation in diverse clinical settings and seamless integration into standard workflows are necessary to fully realize the benefits of DL-driven diagnostics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信