监禁、耻辱与劳动力:36个经合组织国家的监狱作为劳动治理机构

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Andrew P. Davis , Michael Gibson-Light , Jessica Pfaffendorf , Christian Alberg
{"title":"监禁、耻辱与劳动力:36个经合组织国家的监狱作为劳动治理机构","authors":"Andrew P. Davis ,&nbsp;Michael Gibson-Light ,&nbsp;Jessica Pfaffendorf ,&nbsp;Christian Alberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars of punishment have long been interested in secondary consequences of criminal justice contact. Recent work in this vein demonstrates that higher levels of incarceration puts negative pressure on labor unions, yet much of this work focuses solely on the United States—underscoring important gaps in our knowledge of how the prison operates in broader context. This article extends this research to explore the extent to which incarceration rates across 36 OECD countries affect unionization from 1961 to 2017. Results from panel data analysis support that incarceration rates diminish union density across context and time. These findings contribute to literatures on neoliberal penality, union decline, and investigations into consequences of incarceration beyond the somewhat exceptional case of US penal practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incarceration, stigma, and labor power: The prison as labor governance institution in 36 OECD countries\",\"authors\":\"Andrew P. Davis ,&nbsp;Michael Gibson-Light ,&nbsp;Jessica Pfaffendorf ,&nbsp;Christian Alberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Scholars of punishment have long been interested in secondary consequences of criminal justice contact. Recent work in this vein demonstrates that higher levels of incarceration puts negative pressure on labor unions, yet much of this work focuses solely on the United States—underscoring important gaps in our knowledge of how the prison operates in broader context. This article extends this research to explore the extent to which incarceration rates across 36 OECD countries affect unionization from 1961 to 2017. Results from panel data analysis support that incarceration rates diminish union density across context and time. These findings contribute to literatures on neoliberal penality, union decline, and investigations into consequences of incarceration beyond the somewhat exceptional case of US penal practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Research\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刑罚学者长期以来一直对刑事司法接触的次要后果感兴趣。最近在这方面的研究表明,更高的监禁水平给工会带来了负面压力,然而,这些研究的大部分只关注美国——强调了我们对监狱如何在更广泛的背景下运作的认识的重要差距。本文扩展了这一研究,探讨了1961年至2017年36个经合组织国家的监禁率对工会化的影响程度。面板数据分析的结果支持监禁率在不同背景和时间内降低了工会密度。这些发现有助于新自由主义刑罚、工会衰落的文献,以及对美国刑罚实践中某些例外情况之外的监禁后果的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incarceration, stigma, and labor power: The prison as labor governance institution in 36 OECD countries
Scholars of punishment have long been interested in secondary consequences of criminal justice contact. Recent work in this vein demonstrates that higher levels of incarceration puts negative pressure on labor unions, yet much of this work focuses solely on the United States—underscoring important gaps in our knowledge of how the prison operates in broader context. This article extends this research to explore the extent to which incarceration rates across 36 OECD countries affect unionization from 1961 to 2017. Results from panel data analysis support that incarceration rates diminish union density across context and time. These findings contribute to literatures on neoliberal penality, union decline, and investigations into consequences of incarceration beyond the somewhat exceptional case of US penal practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信