松橡树型:一种独特的弹性全球系统,具有很高的基于自然的解决方案潜力

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Surendra Pratap Singh , Donald B. Zobel
{"title":"松橡树型:一种独特的弹性全球系统,具有很高的基于自然的解决方案潜力","authors":"Surendra Pratap Singh ,&nbsp;Donald B. Zobel","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, <em>Pinus</em> (∼113 species) and <em>Quercus</em> (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (<em>Pinus</em> species) and oaks (<em>Quercus</em> species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113536"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pine-Oak Type: A unique resilient global system with high potential for nature-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"Surendra Pratap Singh ,&nbsp;Donald B. Zobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, <em>Pinus</em> (∼113 species) and <em>Quercus</em> (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (<em>Pinus</em> species) and oaks (<em>Quercus</em> species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004662\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分布在北半球所有大陆的松树(约113种)和栎树(约435种)是地球上最重要的森林形成属。松树(Pinus种)和橡树(Quercus种)在进化史上相隔约1亿年,因此在生活史、形态和对环境的适应方面存在显著差异,具有巨大的生态重要性。然而,对许多物种和一些地理区域的生态学研究却很少。在这里,我们讨论了为什么“松栎型”是一个具有全球意义的重要生态实体,包括:(i)进化的时间尺度,(ii)属的多样化,(iii)物种的环境响应,以及(iv)尽管松树和橡树对干旱和火灾的反应不同,但它们却能共存。此外,鉴于它们的长期持久性、复原力和演替联系,我们(v)讨论了它们在基于自然的解决方案(NbS)方面的潜力。松树的基本策略是保持“宽安全边际”,无论是在水力参数方面,还是在保护厚皮茎以应对水分胁迫和火灾方面,橡树都依赖于干旱或/和火灾造成的损害后的有效恢复。为了实现这一目标,橡树的策略是通过在干燥条件下保持气孔开放来最大限度地捕获资源(碳水化合物),并利用资源通过再生来恢复。有必要将研究扩展到更多种类的松树和橡树,以了解这个生态系统。例如,在喜马拉雅山脉的一些地区,松树和橡树林为有机农业的发展做出了贡献,并在不断变化的世界中为国家统计局提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pine-Oak Type: A unique resilient global system with high potential for nature-based solutions
Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, Pinus (∼113 species) and Quercus (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (Pinus species) and oaks (Quercus species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信