{"title":"松橡树型:一种独特的弹性全球系统,具有很高的基于自然的解决方案潜力","authors":"Surendra Pratap Singh , Donald B. Zobel","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, <em>Pinus</em> (∼113 species) and <em>Quercus</em> (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (<em>Pinus</em> species) and oaks (<em>Quercus</em> species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113536"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pine-Oak Type: A unique resilient global system with high potential for nature-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"Surendra Pratap Singh , Donald B. Zobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, <em>Pinus</em> (∼113 species) and <em>Quercus</em> (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (<em>Pinus</em> species) and oaks (<em>Quercus</em> species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004662\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pine-Oak Type: A unique resilient global system with high potential for nature-based solutions
Distributed across all the continents of the Northern Hemisphere, Pinus (∼113 species) and Quercus (∼435 species) are among the most important forest forming genera of the planet. The cooccurrence of pines (Pinus species) and oaks (Quercus species), separated by ∼ 100 million years in the evolutionary history, and hence differing conspicuously in life history, morphology and adaptation to environment, has immense ecological importance. However, ecology of many species and several geographical areas has hardly been investigated. Here, we discuss why “pine and oak type” is an important ecological entity of global significance with regard to (i) evolutionary time scale, and (ii) diversification of the genera, (iii) environmental responses of species, and (iv) co-occurrence of pine and oak despite their contrasting responses to drought and fire. Furthermore, given their long term persistence, and resilience and successional linkage we have (v) discussed a few aspects of their potential for Nature based Solutions (NbS). While the pines’ basic strategy is to keep a ‘wide safety margin’, both in terms of hydraulic parameters and protection of stem with thick bark to deal with water stress and fire respectively, oaks depend on effective recovery after the damage caused by drought or/and fire. To achieve it, oaks’ strategy is to maximise resource (carbohydrate) capture by keeping stomata open in dry conditions and use resources to recover by resprouting. There is a need to extend research to many more species of pine and oak to understand this ecological system. Pine and oak forests have contributed to the sustenance of organic agriculture in several parts of Himalayas as an example, and hold potential for NbS in a changing world.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.