Ruifo Zhang , Zhengyu Tan , Zemin Lin , Ruiying Zhang , Chenhui Liu
{"title":"探索经验丰富的高级驾驶辅助系统驾驶员的信任和行为:一项道路研究","authors":"Ruifo Zhang , Zhengyu Tan , Zemin Lin , Ruiying Zhang , Chenhui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trust in automation is crucial for the optimal utilization of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). While previous studies have examined trust in automated driving (TiAD) and its impact on behavior, there remains a need to explore how experienced drivers interact with partially automated systems in real-world contexts. This study investigates the trust and behavior of 34 experienced ADAS drivers, divided into trustful and distrustful groups, during on-road driving encompassing six typical scenarios. This study evaluates the initial and final TiAD, situational trust across six driving scenarios; and behaviors, including hands-off the steering wheel, engagement in non-driving-related activities (NDRAs), and visual behavior. Results reveal no significant change in TiAD between pre- and post-driving evaluations, but there are significant differences in TiAD and situational trust across six scenarios between the trustful and distrustful groups. Regarding behavior, trustful drivers exhibit more hands-off events and delay responses to warnings. Both groups engage in risky NDRAs with different patterns, while trustful drivers showing a higher tendency for high-risk NDRAs. Visual behavior analysis shows that trustful drivers spend less time monitoring the driving environment, particularly in complex scenarios such as lane addition/reduction, but more time focusing on the human–machine interface (HMI) overall compared to distrustful drivers. The study also explores the impact of ADAS type and mileage, showing that drivers with advanced functionality exhibit higher trust and reduced monitoring, while mileage influence trust with a turning point at around 3,000 km. With these findings, this study highlights safety risks and proposes strategies to address them. This study is expected to provide insights into trust research and ADAS optimization, enhancing driving safety and user experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 108071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the trust and behavior of experienced advanced driver assistance system drivers: An on-road study\",\"authors\":\"Ruifo Zhang , Zhengyu Tan , Zemin Lin , Ruiying Zhang , Chenhui Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Trust in automation is crucial for the optimal utilization of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). While previous studies have examined trust in automated driving (TiAD) and its impact on behavior, there remains a need to explore how experienced drivers interact with partially automated systems in real-world contexts. This study investigates the trust and behavior of 34 experienced ADAS drivers, divided into trustful and distrustful groups, during on-road driving encompassing six typical scenarios. This study evaluates the initial and final TiAD, situational trust across six driving scenarios; and behaviors, including hands-off the steering wheel, engagement in non-driving-related activities (NDRAs), and visual behavior. Results reveal no significant change in TiAD between pre- and post-driving evaluations, but there are significant differences in TiAD and situational trust across six scenarios between the trustful and distrustful groups. Regarding behavior, trustful drivers exhibit more hands-off events and delay responses to warnings. Both groups engage in risky NDRAs with different patterns, while trustful drivers showing a higher tendency for high-risk NDRAs. Visual behavior analysis shows that trustful drivers spend less time monitoring the driving environment, particularly in complex scenarios such as lane addition/reduction, but more time focusing on the human–machine interface (HMI) overall compared to distrustful drivers. The study also explores the impact of ADAS type and mileage, showing that drivers with advanced functionality exhibit higher trust and reduced monitoring, while mileage influence trust with a turning point at around 3,000 km. With these findings, this study highlights safety risks and proposes strategies to address them. This study is expected to provide insights into trust research and ADAS optimization, enhancing driving safety and user experience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"217 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001575\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the trust and behavior of experienced advanced driver assistance system drivers: An on-road study
Trust in automation is crucial for the optimal utilization of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). While previous studies have examined trust in automated driving (TiAD) and its impact on behavior, there remains a need to explore how experienced drivers interact with partially automated systems in real-world contexts. This study investigates the trust and behavior of 34 experienced ADAS drivers, divided into trustful and distrustful groups, during on-road driving encompassing six typical scenarios. This study evaluates the initial and final TiAD, situational trust across six driving scenarios; and behaviors, including hands-off the steering wheel, engagement in non-driving-related activities (NDRAs), and visual behavior. Results reveal no significant change in TiAD between pre- and post-driving evaluations, but there are significant differences in TiAD and situational trust across six scenarios between the trustful and distrustful groups. Regarding behavior, trustful drivers exhibit more hands-off events and delay responses to warnings. Both groups engage in risky NDRAs with different patterns, while trustful drivers showing a higher tendency for high-risk NDRAs. Visual behavior analysis shows that trustful drivers spend less time monitoring the driving environment, particularly in complex scenarios such as lane addition/reduction, but more time focusing on the human–machine interface (HMI) overall compared to distrustful drivers. The study also explores the impact of ADAS type and mileage, showing that drivers with advanced functionality exhibit higher trust and reduced monitoring, while mileage influence trust with a turning point at around 3,000 km. With these findings, this study highlights safety risks and proposes strategies to address them. This study is expected to provide insights into trust research and ADAS optimization, enhancing driving safety and user experience.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.