Carol L. Hodgson PT, PhD , Tessa Broadley BBiomedSc (Hons) , Michelle Paton M.Phty, PhD , Alisa M. Higgins MPH, PhD , Shannah Anderson , Sue Brennan PhD , Catherine L. Granger BPhysio(Hons), PhD , Naomi E. Hammond RN, PhD , Sherene Magana Cruz , Jenna K. Lang PhD , I. Anne Leditschke MBBS , Neil R. Orford FCICM, PhD , Selina M. Parry B.Physio (Hons), PhD , Bronwyn Price BPhty , Pam Taylor , Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD , Sally E. Green PhD
{"title":"澳大利亚临床实践指南的物理康复和动员在成人重症监护病房","authors":"Carol L. Hodgson PT, PhD , Tessa Broadley BBiomedSc (Hons) , Michelle Paton M.Phty, PhD , Alisa M. Higgins MPH, PhD , Shannah Anderson , Sue Brennan PhD , Catherine L. Granger BPhysio(Hons), PhD , Naomi E. Hammond RN, PhD , Sherene Magana Cruz , Jenna K. Lang PhD , I. Anne Leditschke MBBS , Neil R. Orford FCICM, PhD , Selina M. Parry B.Physio (Hons), PhD , Bronwyn Price BPhty , Pam Taylor , Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD , Sally E. Green PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Summary of recommendations</h3><div>Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 101235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian clinical practice guideline for physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adult intensive care units\",\"authors\":\"Carol L. Hodgson PT, PhD , Tessa Broadley BBiomedSc (Hons) , Michelle Paton M.Phty, PhD , Alisa M. Higgins MPH, PhD , Shannah Anderson , Sue Brennan PhD , Catherine L. Granger BPhysio(Hons), PhD , Naomi E. Hammond RN, PhD , Sherene Magana Cruz , Jenna K. Lang PhD , I. Anne Leditschke MBBS , Neil R. Orford FCICM, PhD , Selina M. Parry B.Physio (Hons), PhD , Bronwyn Price BPhty , Pam Taylor , Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD , Sally E. Green PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Summary of recommendations</h3><div>Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Australian clinical practice guideline for physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adult intensive care units
Background
The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice.
Objective
The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units.
Methods
The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.
Summary of recommendations
Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations.
Conclusion
The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research.
期刊介绍:
Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.