利用Bagging、Boosting和Stacking机器学习技术模拟岩心驱油,预测油水相对渗透率

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ragheed Alali*, Kazunori Abe* and Hikari Fujii, 
{"title":"利用Bagging、Boosting和Stacking机器学习技术模拟岩心驱油,预测油水相对渗透率","authors":"Ragheed Alali*,&nbsp;Kazunori Abe* and Hikari Fujii,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c0708910.1021/acsomega.4c07089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Oil field development and management require oil reservoir simulations, whose parameters include relative permeability curves. However, empirical measurement of relative permeabilities can be arduous and time-consuming, and the machine learning models that can predict them are often difficult to use. This study presents the simulation of a core flooding experiment using predicted oil and water relative permeabilities and the simple supervised machine learning models used to predict them. A model was developed for predicting each relative permeability. These models were based on a data set containing over 1000 data points and bagging, boosting, and stacking techniques (random forest, adaptive boosting, and linear regression algorithms). Model evaluation showed a high coefficient of determination and a small mean squared error, demonstrating model accuracy. Furthermore, the evaluation metrics of <i>k</i>-fold cross-validation were close to those of the models, indicating they could generalize and had minimal overfitting. The experimental and simulated oil recovery factors were 60.05 and 59.45%, respectively, with a history match quality index of 95%. These findings validated the machine learning models’ predictions as viable alternatives that researchers can use when lacking empirically measured values.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 16","pages":"15967–15978 15967–15978"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c07089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of Core Flooding with Predicted Oil and Water Relative Permeabilities Using Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking Machine Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ragheed Alali*,&nbsp;Kazunori Abe* and Hikari Fujii,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c0708910.1021/acsomega.4c07089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Oil field development and management require oil reservoir simulations, whose parameters include relative permeability curves. However, empirical measurement of relative permeabilities can be arduous and time-consuming, and the machine learning models that can predict them are often difficult to use. This study presents the simulation of a core flooding experiment using predicted oil and water relative permeabilities and the simple supervised machine learning models used to predict them. A model was developed for predicting each relative permeability. These models were based on a data set containing over 1000 data points and bagging, boosting, and stacking techniques (random forest, adaptive boosting, and linear regression algorithms). Model evaluation showed a high coefficient of determination and a small mean squared error, demonstrating model accuracy. Furthermore, the evaluation metrics of <i>k</i>-fold cross-validation were close to those of the models, indicating they could generalize and had minimal overfitting. The experimental and simulated oil recovery factors were 60.05 and 59.45%, respectively, with a history match quality index of 95%. These findings validated the machine learning models’ predictions as viable alternatives that researchers can use when lacking empirically measured values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 16\",\"pages\":\"15967–15978 15967–15978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c07089\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c07089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c07089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油田开发管理需要油藏模拟,其参数包括相对渗透率曲线。然而,相对渗透率的经验测量可能是艰巨而耗时的,并且可以预测它们的机器学习模型通常难以使用。本研究利用预测的油水相对渗透率和用于预测的简单监督机器学习模型,模拟了岩心驱油实验。建立了预测各相对渗透率的模型。这些模型基于包含超过1000个数据点的数据集以及套袋、增强和堆叠技术(随机森林、自适应增强和线性回归算法)。模型评价显示出较高的决定系数和较小的均方误差,证明了模型的准确性。此外,k-fold交叉验证的评价指标与模型的评价指标接近,表明它们可以泛化并且具有最小的过拟合。实验和模拟采油系数分别为60.05和59.45%,历史匹配质量指数为95%。这些发现证实了机器学习模型的预测是研究人员在缺乏经验测量值时可以使用的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation of Core Flooding with Predicted Oil and Water Relative Permeabilities Using Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking Machine Learning Techniques

Oil field development and management require oil reservoir simulations, whose parameters include relative permeability curves. However, empirical measurement of relative permeabilities can be arduous and time-consuming, and the machine learning models that can predict them are often difficult to use. This study presents the simulation of a core flooding experiment using predicted oil and water relative permeabilities and the simple supervised machine learning models used to predict them. A model was developed for predicting each relative permeability. These models were based on a data set containing over 1000 data points and bagging, boosting, and stacking techniques (random forest, adaptive boosting, and linear regression algorithms). Model evaluation showed a high coefficient of determination and a small mean squared error, demonstrating model accuracy. Furthermore, the evaluation metrics of k-fold cross-validation were close to those of the models, indicating they could generalize and had minimal overfitting. The experimental and simulated oil recovery factors were 60.05 and 59.45%, respectively, with a history match quality index of 95%. These findings validated the machine learning models’ predictions as viable alternatives that researchers can use when lacking empirically measured values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信