大多数美国人不喜欢大规模监禁:在惩罚力度下降的时代,这是一种刑罚敏感性

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Alexander L. Burton, Francis T. Cullen, Cheryl Lero Jonson, Justin T. Pickett
{"title":"大多数美国人不喜欢大规模监禁:在惩罚力度下降的时代,这是一种刑罚敏感性","authors":"Alexander L. Burton, Francis T. Cullen, Cheryl Lero Jonson, Justin T. Pickett","doi":"10.1007/s11292-025-09671-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study examines the extent to which “mass incarceration” has support among the American public as the lynchpin of correctional policy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Three information experiments embedded in a 2023 nationwide YouGov survey of 1000 Americans tested whether providing facts about the extent and nature of incarceration impacts public opinion.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Few Americans support the imprisonment binge; many are emotionally bothered by it and believe it is immoral, inhumane, and/or racist. The experimental information treatments had little impact on public opinion, which is consistent with the theory that popular discourse, media coverage, and personal and vicarious experiences with incarceration have increased Americans’ awareness of the carceral state.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings align with broader evidence that public punitiveness has declined in recent years, ushering in a new penal sensibility. The results suggest the “get tough” movement has lost traction in the United States, partly because of growing knowledge about the carceral state.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Most Americans do not like mass incarceration: penal sensibility in an era of declining punitiveness\",\"authors\":\"Alexander L. Burton, Francis T. Cullen, Cheryl Lero Jonson, Justin T. Pickett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-025-09671-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>This study examines the extent to which “mass incarceration” has support among the American public as the lynchpin of correctional policy.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Three information experiments embedded in a 2023 nationwide YouGov survey of 1000 Americans tested whether providing facts about the extent and nature of incarceration impacts public opinion.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Few Americans support the imprisonment binge; many are emotionally bothered by it and believe it is immoral, inhumane, and/or racist. The experimental information treatments had little impact on public opinion, which is consistent with the theory that popular discourse, media coverage, and personal and vicarious experiences with incarceration have increased Americans’ awareness of the carceral state.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings align with broader evidence that public punitiveness has declined in recent years, ushering in a new penal sensibility. The results suggest the “get tough” movement has lost traction in the United States, partly because of growing knowledge about the carceral state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09671-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09671-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了“大规模监禁”在多大程度上得到了美国公众的支持,并将其作为矫正政策的关键。YouGov在2023年对1000名美国人进行了一项全国性调查,其中包含三项信息实验,测试提供有关监禁程度和性质的事实是否会影响公众舆论。结果很少有美国人支持监禁狂欢;许多人在情感上受到困扰,认为这是不道德的、不人道的和/或种族主义的。实验信息处理对公众舆论的影响很小,这与大众话语、媒体报道以及个人和间接的监禁经历增加了美国人对监禁状态的认识的理论是一致的。这些发现与更广泛的证据一致,即近年来公众惩罚力度有所下降,带来了一种新的刑罚敏感性。调查结果表明,“强硬起来”运动在美国已经失去了吸引力,部分原因是人们对加州的了解越来越多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Most Americans do not like mass incarceration: penal sensibility in an era of declining punitiveness

Objectives

This study examines the extent to which “mass incarceration” has support among the American public as the lynchpin of correctional policy.

Methods

Three information experiments embedded in a 2023 nationwide YouGov survey of 1000 Americans tested whether providing facts about the extent and nature of incarceration impacts public opinion.

Results

Few Americans support the imprisonment binge; many are emotionally bothered by it and believe it is immoral, inhumane, and/or racist. The experimental information treatments had little impact on public opinion, which is consistent with the theory that popular discourse, media coverage, and personal and vicarious experiences with incarceration have increased Americans’ awareness of the carceral state.

Conclusions

The findings align with broader evidence that public punitiveness has declined in recent years, ushering in a new penal sensibility. The results suggest the “get tough” movement has lost traction in the United States, partly because of growing knowledge about the carceral state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信