晚期nc阶段3:区分严重晚期nc和FTLD-TDP的诊断标准

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ryan K. Shahidehpour, Yuriko Katsumata, Dennis W. Dickson, Nikhil B. Ghayal, Khine Zin Aung, Xian Wu, Panhavuth Phe, Gregory A. Jicha, Allison M. Neltner, Jessalin R. C. Archer, Maria M. Corrada, Claudia H. Kawas, S. Ahmad Sajjadi, Davis C. Woodworth, Syed A. Bukhari, Thomas J. Montine, David W. Fardo, Peter T. Nelson
{"title":"晚期nc阶段3:区分严重晚期nc和FTLD-TDP的诊断标准","authors":"Ryan K. Shahidehpour,&nbsp;Yuriko Katsumata,&nbsp;Dennis W. Dickson,&nbsp;Nikhil B. Ghayal,&nbsp;Khine Zin Aung,&nbsp;Xian Wu,&nbsp;Panhavuth Phe,&nbsp;Gregory A. Jicha,&nbsp;Allison M. Neltner,&nbsp;Jessalin R. C. Archer,&nbsp;Maria M. Corrada,&nbsp;Claudia H. Kawas,&nbsp;S. Ahmad Sajjadi,&nbsp;Davis C. Woodworth,&nbsp;Syed A. Bukhari,&nbsp;Thomas J. Montine,&nbsp;David W. Fardo,&nbsp;Peter T. Nelson","doi":"10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A diagnostic rubric is required to distinguish between limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP). In LATE-NC Stage 3, TDP-43 proteinopathy is present in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), thus posing a potential diagnostic challenge in differentiating these severe LATE-NC cases from FTLD-TDP. LATE-NC Stage 3 cases and other TDP-43 proteinopathies were analyzed from the University of Kentucky (total n = 514 with TDP-43 pathology assessed), The 90+ Study at the University of California Irvine (n = 458), and the Mayo Clinic (n = 5067) brain banks. Digital pathology was used to quantify pathology burden in a select subset of cases (n = 51), complemented by a previously-described manual counting method and expert neuropathologic examinations to evaluate qualitative features such as FTLD-TDP types and subtypes of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). To evaluate clinical and genetic characteristics of LATE-NC Stage 3, data were analyzed from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Neuropathology Data set and correlated with findings from the Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). When using TDP-43 proteinopathy quantification in the MFG as a diagnostic criterion, more than 90% of cases could be classified as either LATE-NC Stage 3 or FTLD-TDP. Diagnostically challenging scenarios included a subset of FTLD-TDP Type B cases with relatively mild MFG TDP-43 pathology and a novel non-LATE-NC, non-FTLD-TDP pathologic subtype with severe MFG TDP-43 pathology. Taking these potential pitfalls into account, a classification schema was developed that could correctly diagnose all included cases. There was no difference in the Alzheimer’s disease pathological load in LATE-NC Stages 2 versus 3. In genetic analyses, the <i>GRN</i> (rs5848) risk allele was preferentially associated with LATE-NC Stage 3, whereas <i>TMEM106B</i> and <i>APOE</i> risk-associated variants were not. In conclusion, LATE-NC Stage 3 could be differentiated reliably from FTLD-TDP and other TDP-43-opathies, based on a data-driven diagnostic rubric.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7012,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropathologica","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LATE-NC Stage 3: a diagnostic rubric to differentiate severe LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP\",\"authors\":\"Ryan K. Shahidehpour,&nbsp;Yuriko Katsumata,&nbsp;Dennis W. Dickson,&nbsp;Nikhil B. Ghayal,&nbsp;Khine Zin Aung,&nbsp;Xian Wu,&nbsp;Panhavuth Phe,&nbsp;Gregory A. Jicha,&nbsp;Allison M. Neltner,&nbsp;Jessalin R. C. Archer,&nbsp;Maria M. Corrada,&nbsp;Claudia H. Kawas,&nbsp;S. Ahmad Sajjadi,&nbsp;Davis C. Woodworth,&nbsp;Syed A. Bukhari,&nbsp;Thomas J. Montine,&nbsp;David W. Fardo,&nbsp;Peter T. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A diagnostic rubric is required to distinguish between limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP). In LATE-NC Stage 3, TDP-43 proteinopathy is present in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), thus posing a potential diagnostic challenge in differentiating these severe LATE-NC cases from FTLD-TDP. LATE-NC Stage 3 cases and other TDP-43 proteinopathies were analyzed from the University of Kentucky (total n = 514 with TDP-43 pathology assessed), The 90+ Study at the University of California Irvine (n = 458), and the Mayo Clinic (n = 5067) brain banks. Digital pathology was used to quantify pathology burden in a select subset of cases (n = 51), complemented by a previously-described manual counting method and expert neuropathologic examinations to evaluate qualitative features such as FTLD-TDP types and subtypes of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). To evaluate clinical and genetic characteristics of LATE-NC Stage 3, data were analyzed from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Neuropathology Data set and correlated with findings from the Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). When using TDP-43 proteinopathy quantification in the MFG as a diagnostic criterion, more than 90% of cases could be classified as either LATE-NC Stage 3 or FTLD-TDP. Diagnostically challenging scenarios included a subset of FTLD-TDP Type B cases with relatively mild MFG TDP-43 pathology and a novel non-LATE-NC, non-FTLD-TDP pathologic subtype with severe MFG TDP-43 pathology. Taking these potential pitfalls into account, a classification schema was developed that could correctly diagnose all included cases. There was no difference in the Alzheimer’s disease pathological load in LATE-NC Stages 2 versus 3. In genetic analyses, the <i>GRN</i> (rs5848) risk allele was preferentially associated with LATE-NC Stage 3, whereas <i>TMEM106B</i> and <i>APOE</i> risk-associated variants were not. In conclusion, LATE-NC Stage 3 could be differentiated reliably from FTLD-TDP and other TDP-43-opathies, based on a data-driven diagnostic rubric.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropathologica\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropathologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropathologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00401-025-02876-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要一个诊断标准来区分边缘显性年龄相关性TDP-43脑病神经病理改变(LATE-NC)和伴有TDP-43包涵体的额颞叶变性(FTLD-TDP)。在晚期nc 3期,TDP-43蛋白病变存在于中额回(MFG),因此在区分这些严重的晚期nc病例和FTLD-TDP时提出了潜在的诊断挑战。我们分析了来自肯塔基大学(共n = 514例TDP-43病理评估)、加州大学欧文分校(n = 458)和梅奥诊所(n = 5067)脑库的晚期nc 3期病例和其他TDP-43蛋白病变。数字病理学用于量化选定病例子集(n = 51)的病理负担,辅以先前描述的人工计数方法和专家神经病理学检查来评估定性特征,如FTLD-TDP类型和神经元胞浆包涵体(NCIs)亚型。为了评估晚期nc 3期的临床和遗传特征,分析了来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(NACC)神经病理学数据集的数据,并与阿尔茨海默病遗传学联盟(ADGC)的研究结果进行了关联。当使用MFG中TDP-43蛋白病变定量作为诊断标准时,超过90%的病例可归类为晚期nc 3期或FTLD-TDP。诊断上具有挑战性的情况包括FTLD-TDP B型病例的一个子集,其MFG - TDP-43病理相对轻微,以及一种新的非晚期nc,非FTLD-TDP病理亚型,其MFG - TDP-43病理严重。考虑到这些潜在的缺陷,我们开发了一个可以正确诊断所有病例的分类模式。晚期nc 2期和3期的阿尔茨海默病病理负荷没有差异。在遗传分析中,GRN (rs5848)风险等位基因优先与晚期nc 3期相关,而TMEM106B和APOE风险相关变异则没有。总之,基于数据驱动的诊断标准,晚期nc 3期可以可靠地与FTLD-TDP和其他tdp -43病变区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LATE-NC Stage 3: a diagnostic rubric to differentiate severe LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP

A diagnostic rubric is required to distinguish between limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP). In LATE-NC Stage 3, TDP-43 proteinopathy is present in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), thus posing a potential diagnostic challenge in differentiating these severe LATE-NC cases from FTLD-TDP. LATE-NC Stage 3 cases and other TDP-43 proteinopathies were analyzed from the University of Kentucky (total n = 514 with TDP-43 pathology assessed), The 90+ Study at the University of California Irvine (n = 458), and the Mayo Clinic (n = 5067) brain banks. Digital pathology was used to quantify pathology burden in a select subset of cases (n = 51), complemented by a previously-described manual counting method and expert neuropathologic examinations to evaluate qualitative features such as FTLD-TDP types and subtypes of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). To evaluate clinical and genetic characteristics of LATE-NC Stage 3, data were analyzed from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Neuropathology Data set and correlated with findings from the Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). When using TDP-43 proteinopathy quantification in the MFG as a diagnostic criterion, more than 90% of cases could be classified as either LATE-NC Stage 3 or FTLD-TDP. Diagnostically challenging scenarios included a subset of FTLD-TDP Type B cases with relatively mild MFG TDP-43 pathology and a novel non-LATE-NC, non-FTLD-TDP pathologic subtype with severe MFG TDP-43 pathology. Taking these potential pitfalls into account, a classification schema was developed that could correctly diagnose all included cases. There was no difference in the Alzheimer’s disease pathological load in LATE-NC Stages 2 versus 3. In genetic analyses, the GRN (rs5848) risk allele was preferentially associated with LATE-NC Stage 3, whereas TMEM106B and APOE risk-associated variants were not. In conclusion, LATE-NC Stage 3 could be differentiated reliably from FTLD-TDP and other TDP-43-opathies, based on a data-driven diagnostic rubric.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neuropathologica
Acta Neuropathologica 医学-病理学
CiteScore
23.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropathologica publishes top-quality papers on the pathology of neurological diseases and experimental studies on molecular and cellular mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo models, ideally validated by analysis of human tissues. The journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Case Reports, and Scientific Correspondence (Letters). Manuscripts must adhere to ethical standards, including review by appropriate ethics committees for human studies and compliance with principles of laboratory animal care for animal experiments. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the manuscript, and authors are responsible for ensuring accuracy and adherence to these requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信