河流污染物运移的综合多模型分析:通过暂态存储动力学和分数阶微积分方法提高预测能力

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学
Jafar Chabokpour
{"title":"河流污染物运移的综合多模型分析:通过暂态存储动力学和分数阶微积分方法提高预测能力","authors":"Jafar Chabokpour","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻<sup>1</sup> along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km<sup>2</sup>/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 3","pages":"2835 - 2849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative multi-model analysis of river pollutant transport: advancing predictive capabilities through transient storage dynamics and fractional calculus approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jafar Chabokpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻<sup>1</sup> along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km<sup>2</sup>/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"2835 - 2849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过考虑多种建模方法,详细分析了河流系统中污染物的运移,试图解释控制污染物命运和运动的复杂动力学。通过对Conococheague Creek的示踪剂实验数据,比较了平流-弥散方程、瞬态存储模型、聚集死区模型、连续搅拌槽反应器串联模型和分数平流-弥散方程的性能。在跨度为33.86 km的6个监测站上,暂态存储模型(TSM)的最低均方根误差为1.56 ppm, R2为0.982。河段特异性分析给出了沿河道的交换系数从0.28到0.18 h- 1,而相对储存区的大小从最初的0.15增加到0.22,然后在最后一河段再次下降到0.17。研究发现,对流速度是影响最大的参数,其Sobol一阶指数为0.512,其次是色散系数0.283。力矩分析结果显示,整个河段的平均流速为0.69 km/h,分散系数为0.41 km2/h。量纲分析包括建立经验方程,其中R2值为0.79 ~ 0.93,用于参数估计。这些发现强调了瞬态储存过程和非菲克分散的作用,这对于准确预测污染物的输送是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrative multi-model analysis of river pollutant transport: advancing predictive capabilities through transient storage dynamics and fractional calculus approaches

This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an R2 of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻1 along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km2/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the R2 value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信