{"title":"河流污染物运移的综合多模型分析:通过暂态存储动力学和分数阶微积分方法提高预测能力","authors":"Jafar Chabokpour","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻<sup>1</sup> along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km<sup>2</sup>/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 3","pages":"2835 - 2849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative multi-model analysis of river pollutant transport: advancing predictive capabilities through transient storage dynamics and fractional calculus approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jafar Chabokpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻<sup>1</sup> along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km<sup>2</sup>/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"2835 - 2849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01496-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrative multi-model analysis of river pollutant transport: advancing predictive capabilities through transient storage dynamics and fractional calculus approaches
This paper discusses the detailed analysis of pollutant transport in river systems by considering multiple modeling approaches in an attempt to explain the complex dynamics governing contaminant fate and movement. Comparisons were made for the performance of the advection–dispersion equation, the transient storage model, the aggregated dead zone model, continuously stirred tank reactors in series, and the fractional advection–dispersion equation based on data from a conducted tracer experiment on Conococheague Creek. The best performance among models yielded a root mean square error of 1.56 ppm at the lowest and an R2 of 0.982, based on six monitoring stations spanning a length of 33.86 km, from the transient storage model (TSM). The reach-specific analysis gave an exchange coefficient from 0.28 to 0.18 h⁻1 along the river course, while the relative storage zone size increased from initially a value of 0.15 to an increase of 0.22 before dropping again to 0.17 in the last reach. It was found that the advective velocity was the most influential parameter, having a Sobol first-order index of 0.512, followed by the dispersion coefficient at 0.283. Moment analysis returned an average velocity of 0.69 km/h and a dispersion coefficient of 0.41 km2/h for the entire reach. Dimensional analysis involved developing empirical equations, in which the R2 value ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 for the estimation of the parameters. These findings underline the role of transient storage processes and non-Fickian dispersion that is necessary for making an accurate prediction of pollutant transport.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.