接触爆炸作用下钢箱拱肋的抗爆性能及概率易损性评估

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yulin Shan , Zhouhong Zong , Minghong Li , Lu Liu , Shunyin Wan
{"title":"接触爆炸作用下钢箱拱肋的抗爆性能及概率易损性评估","authors":"Yulin Shan ,&nbsp;Zhouhong Zong ,&nbsp;Minghong Li ,&nbsp;Lu Liu ,&nbsp;Shunyin Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To evaluate the blast resistance and vulnerability of steel box arch ribs under contact explosions, explosive and carrying capacity tests were conducted. A validated three-stage finite element model simulated the blast, free vibration, and residual carrying capacity stages. Multi-parameter analysis revealed that explosive mass, location, and rise-span ratio significantly influenced stiffness and carrying capacity damage, while preload had minimal impact. Explosions within the span range of L/6 to 5L/12 caused the most severe damage, and higher rise-span ratios (1/4) resulted in greater structural damage, suggesting an optimal range of 1/6 to 1/5 for improved stability. Damage levels were classified as slight, moderate, severe, or collapse, based on stiffness and capacity thresholds of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5. Accounting for uncertainty, empirical formulas for damage levels were proposed, along with vulnerability curves for single and combined damage indices. The results revealed that, compared to single damage indices, blast vulnerability curves based on combined indices integrating stiffness and carrying capacity damage provide a more comprehensive assessment of steel box arch rib damage, particularly in terms of deformation and carrying capacity performance. This study provides key insights for improving the design and safety of steel box arch ribs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 113363"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blast-resistance performance and probabilistic vulnerability assessment of steel box arch ribs subjected to contact explosions\",\"authors\":\"Yulin Shan ,&nbsp;Zhouhong Zong ,&nbsp;Minghong Li ,&nbsp;Lu Liu ,&nbsp;Shunyin Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To evaluate the blast resistance and vulnerability of steel box arch ribs under contact explosions, explosive and carrying capacity tests were conducted. A validated three-stage finite element model simulated the blast, free vibration, and residual carrying capacity stages. Multi-parameter analysis revealed that explosive mass, location, and rise-span ratio significantly influenced stiffness and carrying capacity damage, while preload had minimal impact. Explosions within the span range of L/6 to 5L/12 caused the most severe damage, and higher rise-span ratios (1/4) resulted in greater structural damage, suggesting an optimal range of 1/6 to 1/5 for improved stability. Damage levels were classified as slight, moderate, severe, or collapse, based on stiffness and capacity thresholds of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5. Accounting for uncertainty, empirical formulas for damage levels were proposed, along with vulnerability curves for single and combined damage indices. The results revealed that, compared to single damage indices, blast vulnerability curves based on combined indices integrating stiffness and carrying capacity damage provide a more comprehensive assessment of steel box arch rib damage, particularly in terms of deformation and carrying capacity performance. This study provides key insights for improving the design and safety of steel box arch ribs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823125004562\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823125004562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为评价箱式拱肋在接触爆炸作用下的抗爆性和易损性,开展了箱式拱肋的爆炸承载力试验。一个经过验证的三级有限元模型模拟了爆炸、自由振动和剩余承载能力阶段。多参数分析表明,爆炸质量、位置和升跨比对结构刚度和承载能力损伤有显著影响,预紧力影响较小。在L/6 ~ 5L/12的跨度范围内爆炸对结构的破坏最为严重,高跨比(1/4)对结构的破坏更大,因此在1/6 ~ 1/5的跨度范围内可以提高稳定性。根据刚度和容量阈值0.1、0.3和0.5,损伤等级分为轻微、中度、严重或崩溃。考虑到不确定性,提出了损伤等级的经验公式,以及单一和组合损伤指标的易损性曲线。结果表明,与单一损伤指标相比,基于刚度和承载力损伤综合指标的爆炸易损性曲线能更全面地评价钢箱拱肋损伤,尤其是变形和承载力性能。该研究为改进钢箱拱肋的设计和安全性提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blast-resistance performance and probabilistic vulnerability assessment of steel box arch ribs subjected to contact explosions
To evaluate the blast resistance and vulnerability of steel box arch ribs under contact explosions, explosive and carrying capacity tests were conducted. A validated three-stage finite element model simulated the blast, free vibration, and residual carrying capacity stages. Multi-parameter analysis revealed that explosive mass, location, and rise-span ratio significantly influenced stiffness and carrying capacity damage, while preload had minimal impact. Explosions within the span range of L/6 to 5L/12 caused the most severe damage, and higher rise-span ratios (1/4) resulted in greater structural damage, suggesting an optimal range of 1/6 to 1/5 for improved stability. Damage levels were classified as slight, moderate, severe, or collapse, based on stiffness and capacity thresholds of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5. Accounting for uncertainty, empirical formulas for damage levels were proposed, along with vulnerability curves for single and combined damage indices. The results revealed that, compared to single damage indices, blast vulnerability curves based on combined indices integrating stiffness and carrying capacity damage provide a more comprehensive assessment of steel box arch rib damage, particularly in terms of deformation and carrying capacity performance. This study provides key insights for improving the design and safety of steel box arch ribs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信