利益相关者如何参与规划中的关键制图?海洋治理决策过程分析

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Juliette Davret, Brice Trouillet
{"title":"利益相关者如何参与规划中的关键制图?海洋治理决策过程分析","authors":"Juliette Davret,&nbsp;Brice Trouillet","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maps play a vital role in planning processes, especially marine spatial planning (MSP), as they are the primary means of representing the vast ocean spaces for stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored the roles stakeholders play and their involvement in MSP, few have considered how maps are created for these stakeholders or how they interpret them. This research seeks to unveil the ‘black box’ of mapping, highlighting how stakeholders engage with the decision-making aspects of map creation and expanding the knowledge base in this domain. It examines the interplay between power and knowledge by analysing how laypeople engage in critical cartography and why it is crucial they understand the maps. Data was collected from focus groups consisting of 30 stakeholders from professional marine sectors, civil society and state departments. The findings reveal that stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, demonstrating how power dynamics are shaped by the use and perception of maps. These dynamics often reinforce the dominance of already powerful stakeholders. The study confirms the existence of non-academic critical cartography and emphasises the importance of taking it into account in multi-stakeholder workshops and participatory mapping projects to prevent the reinforcement of power imbalances. This approach can foster a more equitable mapping process, ensuring that all voices are heard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 104083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do stakeholders engage with critical cartography in planning? Analysis of a decision-making process in marine governance\",\"authors\":\"Juliette Davret,&nbsp;Brice Trouillet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Maps play a vital role in planning processes, especially marine spatial planning (MSP), as they are the primary means of representing the vast ocean spaces for stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored the roles stakeholders play and their involvement in MSP, few have considered how maps are created for these stakeholders or how they interpret them. This research seeks to unveil the ‘black box’ of mapping, highlighting how stakeholders engage with the decision-making aspects of map creation and expanding the knowledge base in this domain. It examines the interplay between power and knowledge by analysing how laypeople engage in critical cartography and why it is crucial they understand the maps. Data was collected from focus groups consisting of 30 stakeholders from professional marine sectors, civil society and state departments. The findings reveal that stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, demonstrating how power dynamics are shaped by the use and perception of maps. These dynamics often reinforce the dominance of already powerful stakeholders. The study confirms the existence of non-academic critical cartography and emphasises the importance of taking it into account in multi-stakeholder workshops and participatory mapping projects to prevent the reinforcement of power imbalances. This approach can foster a more equitable mapping process, ensuring that all voices are heard.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地图在规划过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在海洋空间规划(MSP)中,因为它们是向利益攸关方展示广阔海洋空间的主要手段。虽然有许多研究探讨了利益相关者在MSP中的角色和参与,但很少有人考虑如何为这些利益相关者创建地图或如何解释地图。本研究旨在揭示地图的“黑箱”,强调利益相关者如何参与地图创建的决策方面,并扩大该领域的知识库。它通过分析外行人如何参与批判性制图以及为什么他们理解地图是至关重要的,来检查权力和知识之间的相互作用。数据是从由来自专业海洋部门、民间社会和国家部门的30个利益攸关方组成的焦点小组收集的。研究结果显示,利益相关者积极参与关键制图,展示了权力动态如何受到地图使用和感知的影响。这些动态通常会加强本已强大的利益相关者的主导地位。该研究证实了非学术批判性制图的存在,并强调了在多方利益相关者研讨会和参与式制图项目中考虑到这一点的重要性,以防止权力不平衡的加剧。这种方法可以促进更公平的绘图过程,确保所有的声音都能被听到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do stakeholders engage with critical cartography in planning? Analysis of a decision-making process in marine governance
Maps play a vital role in planning processes, especially marine spatial planning (MSP), as they are the primary means of representing the vast ocean spaces for stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored the roles stakeholders play and their involvement in MSP, few have considered how maps are created for these stakeholders or how they interpret them. This research seeks to unveil the ‘black box’ of mapping, highlighting how stakeholders engage with the decision-making aspects of map creation and expanding the knowledge base in this domain. It examines the interplay between power and knowledge by analysing how laypeople engage in critical cartography and why it is crucial they understand the maps. Data was collected from focus groups consisting of 30 stakeholders from professional marine sectors, civil society and state departments. The findings reveal that stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, demonstrating how power dynamics are shaped by the use and perception of maps. These dynamics often reinforce the dominance of already powerful stakeholders. The study confirms the existence of non-academic critical cartography and emphasises the importance of taking it into account in multi-stakeholder workshops and participatory mapping projects to prevent the reinforcement of power imbalances. This approach can foster a more equitable mapping process, ensuring that all voices are heard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信