Teresa E. Flaxman , Mohammad S. Shourijeh , Sasha Carsen , Zachary A. Flahaut , Nicholas Romanchuk , Michael J. Del Bel , Daniel L. Benoit
{"title":"使用肌肉骨骼模型量化前交叉韧带损伤青少年人群的自愿膝关节力量缺陷和肌肉对扭矩的贡献","authors":"Teresa E. Flaxman , Mohammad S. Shourijeh , Sasha Carsen , Zachary A. Flahaut , Nicholas Romanchuk , Michael J. Del Bel , Daniel L. Benoit","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surface electromyography is commonly used to elucidate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on neuromuscular function. For comparisons, electromyography is normalized to a known value, such as peak activation during maximum voluntary isometric contractions. However, a knee injury may compromise one's ability to achieve a true maximal effort. A simple musculoskeletal model may provide insight into injury related strength deficits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-nine anterior cruciate ligament injured adolescents (14-16 years; 25 females) and 39 matched controls (25 females) completed maximum voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion contractions on an isokinetic dynamometer. A participant-specific musculoskeletal model used normalized electromyography of knee joint muscles to determine a theoretically ideal torque for each contraction type, assuming agonist muscles were fully activated. Strength deficit ratios expressed peak experimental torque relative to theoretically ideal torque. Individual muscle contribution to experimental torque were also computed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Injured participants demonstrated significantly lower experimental torque than controls, with percent group mean difference of 17.8 % for knee extension (Injured:2.33 ± 0.89 vs Controls:2.88 ± 0.56 Nm/kg) and 16.7 % for flexion (Injured:1.22 ± 0.44 vs Controls:1.49 ± 0.27 Nm/kg). Group mean differences in strength ratios reduced to 6.3 % for extension (Injured:0.69 ± 0.11 vs Controls:0.74 ± 0.08) and 10.0 % for flexion (Injured:0.56 ± 0.15 vs Controls:0.63 ± 0.12). No between-group differences in muscular contribution to peak experimental extension torque were observed. Injured participants had lower medial gastrocnemius percent contribution to peak experimental flexion torque.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Isometric strength tests may not adequately identify strength deficits in adolescent anterior cruciate injured populations. Simplified modelling frameworks may be more appropriate for evaluating the relationship between neuromuscular control and functional outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying voluntary knee strength deficits and muscular contribution to torque in an anterior cruciate ligament-injured adolescent population using a musculoskeletal model\",\"authors\":\"Teresa E. Flaxman , Mohammad S. Shourijeh , Sasha Carsen , Zachary A. Flahaut , Nicholas Romanchuk , Michael J. Del Bel , Daniel L. Benoit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surface electromyography is commonly used to elucidate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on neuromuscular function. For comparisons, electromyography is normalized to a known value, such as peak activation during maximum voluntary isometric contractions. However, a knee injury may compromise one's ability to achieve a true maximal effort. A simple musculoskeletal model may provide insight into injury related strength deficits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-nine anterior cruciate ligament injured adolescents (14-16 years; 25 females) and 39 matched controls (25 females) completed maximum voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion contractions on an isokinetic dynamometer. A participant-specific musculoskeletal model used normalized electromyography of knee joint muscles to determine a theoretically ideal torque for each contraction type, assuming agonist muscles were fully activated. Strength deficit ratios expressed peak experimental torque relative to theoretically ideal torque. Individual muscle contribution to experimental torque were also computed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Injured participants demonstrated significantly lower experimental torque than controls, with percent group mean difference of 17.8 % for knee extension (Injured:2.33 ± 0.89 vs Controls:2.88 ± 0.56 Nm/kg) and 16.7 % for flexion (Injured:1.22 ± 0.44 vs Controls:1.49 ± 0.27 Nm/kg). Group mean differences in strength ratios reduced to 6.3 % for extension (Injured:0.69 ± 0.11 vs Controls:0.74 ± 0.08) and 10.0 % for flexion (Injured:0.56 ± 0.15 vs Controls:0.63 ± 0.12). No between-group differences in muscular contribution to peak experimental extension torque were observed. Injured participants had lower medial gastrocnemius percent contribution to peak experimental flexion torque.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Isometric strength tests may not adequately identify strength deficits in adolescent anterior cruciate injured populations. Simplified modelling frameworks may be more appropriate for evaluating the relationship between neuromuscular control and functional outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000944\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying voluntary knee strength deficits and muscular contribution to torque in an anterior cruciate ligament-injured adolescent population using a musculoskeletal model
Background
Surface electromyography is commonly used to elucidate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on neuromuscular function. For comparisons, electromyography is normalized to a known value, such as peak activation during maximum voluntary isometric contractions. However, a knee injury may compromise one's ability to achieve a true maximal effort. A simple musculoskeletal model may provide insight into injury related strength deficits.
Methods
Thirty-nine anterior cruciate ligament injured adolescents (14-16 years; 25 females) and 39 matched controls (25 females) completed maximum voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion contractions on an isokinetic dynamometer. A participant-specific musculoskeletal model used normalized electromyography of knee joint muscles to determine a theoretically ideal torque for each contraction type, assuming agonist muscles were fully activated. Strength deficit ratios expressed peak experimental torque relative to theoretically ideal torque. Individual muscle contribution to experimental torque were also computed.
Findings
Injured participants demonstrated significantly lower experimental torque than controls, with percent group mean difference of 17.8 % for knee extension (Injured:2.33 ± 0.89 vs Controls:2.88 ± 0.56 Nm/kg) and 16.7 % for flexion (Injured:1.22 ± 0.44 vs Controls:1.49 ± 0.27 Nm/kg). Group mean differences in strength ratios reduced to 6.3 % for extension (Injured:0.69 ± 0.11 vs Controls:0.74 ± 0.08) and 10.0 % for flexion (Injured:0.56 ± 0.15 vs Controls:0.63 ± 0.12). No between-group differences in muscular contribution to peak experimental extension torque were observed. Injured participants had lower medial gastrocnemius percent contribution to peak experimental flexion torque.
Interpretation
Isometric strength tests may not adequately identify strength deficits in adolescent anterior cruciate injured populations. Simplified modelling frameworks may be more appropriate for evaluating the relationship between neuromuscular control and functional outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.