{"title":"驯化技术:丹麦碳捕获和储存的社会技术想象","authors":"Inge-Merete Hougaard , Kirstine Lund Christiansen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (<em>necessity</em>, <em>ability</em>, <em>capacity</em> and <em>opportunity</em>) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future<em>.</em> These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: <em>nationalising</em>, <em>utilising</em> and <em>controlling</em> technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104087"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domesticating technology: Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Inge-Merete Hougaard , Kirstine Lund Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (<em>necessity</em>, <em>ability</em>, <em>capacity</em> and <em>opportunity</em>) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future<em>.</em> These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: <em>nationalising</em>, <em>utilising</em> and <em>controlling</em> technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Domesticating technology: Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments (necessity, ability, capacity and opportunity) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future. These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: nationalising, utilising and controlling technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.