转移瘤切除术与立体定向放疗治疗少转移性结直肠肺转移患者:一项系统综述

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110056
Simone A. Gooijer , Anna S.M. Gazendam , Bart Torensma , Jurriaan B. Tuynman , Max Dahele , David J. Heineman , Jerry Braun , Chris Dickhoff , Suresh Senan , Wilhelmina H. Schreurs , Famke L. Schneiders , Martijn van Dorp
{"title":"转移瘤切除术与立体定向放疗治疗少转移性结直肠肺转移患者:一项系统综述","authors":"Simone A. Gooijer ,&nbsp;Anna S.M. Gazendam ,&nbsp;Bart Torensma ,&nbsp;Jurriaan B. Tuynman ,&nbsp;Max Dahele ,&nbsp;David J. Heineman ,&nbsp;Jerry Braun ,&nbsp;Chris Dickhoff ,&nbsp;Suresh Senan ,&nbsp;Wilhelmina H. Schreurs ,&nbsp;Famke L. Schneiders ,&nbsp;Martijn van Dorp","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are both guideline-recommended treatment modalities for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases (CLM). Few evidence is available comparing different local therapies in an oligometastatic population. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of metastasectomy with SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on metastasectomy and SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were identified through Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were assessed and compared between both groups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. A total of 141 studies on metastasectomy (n = 29932) and 16 studies on SBRT (n = 1381) were included in the final analysis. The pooled five-year OS was 52.2 % (CI: 49.8–54.5) and 45.0 % (CI: 31.2–58.9) following metastasectomy and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.213). The pooled five-year PFS was 35.1 % (CI: 32.2–38.1) following metastasectomy and 11.7 % (CI: 0–38.2) following SBRT (p &lt; 0.001). The pooled LRR was 10.5 % (CI: 5.5–15.5) following metastasectomy and 28.1 % (CI: 20.8–35.4) following SBRT (p &lt; 0.001). The average GRADE score of the included studies was low. The data suggest that patients with oligometastatic CLM have a comparable OS rate after metastasectomy or SBRT, but PFS and LRR favour a surgical approach. This systematic review supports initiating a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SBRT in operable patients with oligometastatic CLM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 8","pages":"Article 110056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metastasectomy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Simone A. Gooijer ,&nbsp;Anna S.M. Gazendam ,&nbsp;Bart Torensma ,&nbsp;Jurriaan B. Tuynman ,&nbsp;Max Dahele ,&nbsp;David J. Heineman ,&nbsp;Jerry Braun ,&nbsp;Chris Dickhoff ,&nbsp;Suresh Senan ,&nbsp;Wilhelmina H. Schreurs ,&nbsp;Famke L. Schneiders ,&nbsp;Martijn van Dorp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are both guideline-recommended treatment modalities for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases (CLM). Few evidence is available comparing different local therapies in an oligometastatic population. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of metastasectomy with SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on metastasectomy and SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were identified through Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were assessed and compared between both groups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. A total of 141 studies on metastasectomy (n = 29932) and 16 studies on SBRT (n = 1381) were included in the final analysis. The pooled five-year OS was 52.2 % (CI: 49.8–54.5) and 45.0 % (CI: 31.2–58.9) following metastasectomy and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.213). The pooled five-year PFS was 35.1 % (CI: 32.2–38.1) following metastasectomy and 11.7 % (CI: 0–38.2) following SBRT (p &lt; 0.001). The pooled LRR was 10.5 % (CI: 5.5–15.5) following metastasectomy and 28.1 % (CI: 20.8–35.4) following SBRT (p &lt; 0.001). The average GRADE score of the included studies was low. The data suggest that patients with oligometastatic CLM have a comparable OS rate after metastasectomy or SBRT, but PFS and LRR favour a surgical approach. This systematic review supports initiating a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SBRT in operable patients with oligometastatic CLM.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 110056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325004846\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325004846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转移切除术和立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)都是指南推荐的治疗少转移性结直肠肺转移(CLM)患者的治疗方式。很少有证据可以比较不同的局部治疗在低转移人群。本系统综述旨在比较转移性切除术与SBRT治疗低转移性CLM患者的疗效。根据PRISMA指南进行了系统的文献检索,以确定对低转移性CLM患者进行转移性切除术和SBRT的研究。2000年至2023年间发表的研究通过Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了鉴定。评估并比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部复发率(LRR)。使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具评估偏倚风险。最终分析共纳入141项转移瘤切除术研究(n = 29932)和16项SBRT研究(n = 1381)。转移瘤切除术和SBRT后的5年总生存率分别为52.2% (CI: 49.8-54.5)和45.0% (CI: 31.2-58.9) (p = 0.213)。转移瘤切除术后的5年总生存率为35.1% (CI: 32.2-38.1), SBRT后的5年总生存率为11.7% (CI: 0-38.2)。0.001)。转移瘤切除术后的总LRR为10.5% (CI: 5.5-15.5), SBRT后的总LRR为28.1% (CI: 20.8-35.4)。0.001)。纳入研究的平均GRADE分数较低。数据表明,低转移性CLM患者在转移切除术或SBRT后的OS率相当,但PFS和LRR倾向于手术方法。本系统综述支持启动一项随机对照试验,比较手术和SBRT治疗可手术的低转移性CLM患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metastasectomy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases: a systematic review
Metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are both guideline-recommended treatment modalities for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases (CLM). Few evidence is available comparing different local therapies in an oligometastatic population. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of metastasectomy with SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on metastasectomy and SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were identified through Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were assessed and compared between both groups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. A total of 141 studies on metastasectomy (n = 29932) and 16 studies on SBRT (n = 1381) were included in the final analysis. The pooled five-year OS was 52.2 % (CI: 49.8–54.5) and 45.0 % (CI: 31.2–58.9) following metastasectomy and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.213). The pooled five-year PFS was 35.1 % (CI: 32.2–38.1) following metastasectomy and 11.7 % (CI: 0–38.2) following SBRT (p < 0.001). The pooled LRR was 10.5 % (CI: 5.5–15.5) following metastasectomy and 28.1 % (CI: 20.8–35.4) following SBRT (p < 0.001). The average GRADE score of the included studies was low. The data suggest that patients with oligometastatic CLM have a comparable OS rate after metastasectomy or SBRT, but PFS and LRR favour a surgical approach. This systematic review supports initiating a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SBRT in operable patients with oligometastatic CLM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信