Diego C. de Oliveira , Manoel F.M. Nogueira , Danielle R.S. Guerra , Alan N. Carneiro , Fernando H.B. Santos , Dimitri O. e Silva , Electo E.S. Lora
{"title":"油棕空果串烘烤条件的研究:迈向规模化的一步","authors":"Diego C. de Oliveira , Manoel F.M. Nogueira , Danielle R.S. Guerra , Alan N. Carneiro , Fernando H.B. Santos , Dimitri O. e Silva , Electo E.S. Lora","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work presents results from the EFB torrefaction process, performed in a pilot-scale continuous processing reactor, the Vibrating Electrical Elevator and Reactor (REVE), and a laboratory tubular furnace as a complementary analysis procedure. Raw EFB was processed in the pilot-scale reactor at three temperatures (220 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) for 30 min. Meanwhile, in a tubular furnace (TF), EFB briquettes were processed at six temperatures (210 °C, 220 °C, 230 °C, 240 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) and two processing times (15 min and 30 min). The biocoal resulting from both processes was characterized using proximate, ultimate, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and higher heating value (HHV) determination. TF results show that temperature has the most decisive influence on energy yields than processing time, suggesting the feasibility of processing EFB with shorter retention times, such as 15 min, particularly at low to moderate temperatures (e.g., 210–250 °C), where greater values of energy yield and HHV are obtained (95.7–79.4 % and 19.5–22.9 MJ). The type of reactor also influenced the observed data. While the atmosphere inside the REVE reactor during the torrefaction process is not inert, this was not a significant issue, as its performance, measured by the properties of its biocoal, can be compared to that found in the literature (HHV of 27.5 MJ for 300 °C processing). The samples processed in the REVE reactor achieved O/C and H/C ratios approaching the thresholds required for efficient gasification, 0.26 and 0.57, respectively. Finally, biomass-bound oxygen loss follows the same behavior in both processes evaluated, regardless of the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107914"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of torrefaction conditions for oil palm empty fruit bunches: A step towards scale-up\",\"authors\":\"Diego C. de Oliveira , Manoel F.M. Nogueira , Danielle R.S. Guerra , Alan N. Carneiro , Fernando H.B. Santos , Dimitri O. e Silva , Electo E.S. Lora\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work presents results from the EFB torrefaction process, performed in a pilot-scale continuous processing reactor, the Vibrating Electrical Elevator and Reactor (REVE), and a laboratory tubular furnace as a complementary analysis procedure. Raw EFB was processed in the pilot-scale reactor at three temperatures (220 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) for 30 min. Meanwhile, in a tubular furnace (TF), EFB briquettes were processed at six temperatures (210 °C, 220 °C, 230 °C, 240 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) and two processing times (15 min and 30 min). The biocoal resulting from both processes was characterized using proximate, ultimate, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and higher heating value (HHV) determination. TF results show that temperature has the most decisive influence on energy yields than processing time, suggesting the feasibility of processing EFB with shorter retention times, such as 15 min, particularly at low to moderate temperatures (e.g., 210–250 °C), where greater values of energy yield and HHV are obtained (95.7–79.4 % and 19.5–22.9 MJ). The type of reactor also influenced the observed data. While the atmosphere inside the REVE reactor during the torrefaction process is not inert, this was not a significant issue, as its performance, measured by the properties of its biocoal, can be compared to that found in the literature (HHV of 27.5 MJ for 300 °C processing). The samples processed in the REVE reactor achieved O/C and H/C ratios approaching the thresholds required for efficient gasification, 0.26 and 0.57, respectively. Finally, biomass-bound oxygen loss follows the same behavior in both processes evaluated, regardless of the environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425003253\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425003253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of torrefaction conditions for oil palm empty fruit bunches: A step towards scale-up
This work presents results from the EFB torrefaction process, performed in a pilot-scale continuous processing reactor, the Vibrating Electrical Elevator and Reactor (REVE), and a laboratory tubular furnace as a complementary analysis procedure. Raw EFB was processed in the pilot-scale reactor at three temperatures (220 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) for 30 min. Meanwhile, in a tubular furnace (TF), EFB briquettes were processed at six temperatures (210 °C, 220 °C, 230 °C, 240 °C, 250 °C, and 300 °C) and two processing times (15 min and 30 min). The biocoal resulting from both processes was characterized using proximate, ultimate, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and higher heating value (HHV) determination. TF results show that temperature has the most decisive influence on energy yields than processing time, suggesting the feasibility of processing EFB with shorter retention times, such as 15 min, particularly at low to moderate temperatures (e.g., 210–250 °C), where greater values of energy yield and HHV are obtained (95.7–79.4 % and 19.5–22.9 MJ). The type of reactor also influenced the observed data. While the atmosphere inside the REVE reactor during the torrefaction process is not inert, this was not a significant issue, as its performance, measured by the properties of its biocoal, can be compared to that found in the literature (HHV of 27.5 MJ for 300 °C processing). The samples processed in the REVE reactor achieved O/C and H/C ratios approaching the thresholds required for efficient gasification, 0.26 and 0.57, respectively. Finally, biomass-bound oxygen loss follows the same behavior in both processes evaluated, regardless of the environment.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.