应试教学:揭示学生动机的后果

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Joy Muth , Marko Lüftenegger
{"title":"应试教学:揭示学生动机的后果","authors":"Joy Muth ,&nbsp;Marko Lüftenegger","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread concerns that teaching to the test (TTT) as an (excessive) test preparation strategy undermines students' motivation, research has mainly focused on teacher statements and associations with achievement. Studies examining whether perceived TTT increases as exams approach and how this impacts students' motivation are lacking. Using Expectancy-Value Theory, this study longitudinally investigates changes in perceived TTT and academic motivation among <em>N</em> = 1855 secondary school students nearing graduation. Latent change score models revealed a significant increase in intrinsic motivation, importance, and grade self-efficacy but no influence of initial perceived TTT on motivational development. Perceived TTT increased significantly from grade 11 to 12, predicting changes in intrinsic motivation, importance, and utility but not perceived cost or self-efficacy. These findings challenge the belief that TTT inherently harms motivation, suggesting it may enhance some aspects of motivation when used strategically before exams. However, more studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms fully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching to the test: Unraveling the consequences for student motivation\",\"authors\":\"Joy Muth ,&nbsp;Marko Lüftenegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite widespread concerns that teaching to the test (TTT) as an (excessive) test preparation strategy undermines students' motivation, research has mainly focused on teacher statements and associations with achievement. Studies examining whether perceived TTT increases as exams approach and how this impacts students' motivation are lacking. Using Expectancy-Value Theory, this study longitudinally investigates changes in perceived TTT and academic motivation among <em>N</em> = 1855 secondary school students nearing graduation. Latent change score models revealed a significant increase in intrinsic motivation, importance, and grade self-efficacy but no influence of initial perceived TTT on motivational development. Perceived TTT increased significantly from grade 11 to 12, predicting changes in intrinsic motivation, importance, and utility but not perceived cost or self-efficacy. These findings challenge the belief that TTT inherently harms motivation, suggesting it may enhance some aspects of motivation when used strategically before exams. However, more studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms fully.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000834\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们普遍担心,应试教学(TTT)作为一种(过度的)备考策略会破坏学生的动机,但研究主要集中在教师陈述及其与成绩的联系上。关于感知TTT是否随着考试的临近而增加以及这如何影响学生动机的研究缺乏。本研究运用期望价值理论,对N = 1855名临近毕业中学生的学业动机与TTT感知的变化进行了纵向调查。潜在变化评分模型显示内在动机、重要性和自我效能等级显著增加,但初始感知的TTT对动机发展没有影响。从11年级到12年级,感知TTT显著增加,预测内在动机、重要性和效用的变化,但不预测感知成本或自我效能的变化。这些发现挑战了TTT本质上损害动机的信念,表明在考试前策略性地使用它可能会增强动机的某些方面。然而,需要更多的研究来充分了解潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching to the test: Unraveling the consequences for student motivation
Despite widespread concerns that teaching to the test (TTT) as an (excessive) test preparation strategy undermines students' motivation, research has mainly focused on teacher statements and associations with achievement. Studies examining whether perceived TTT increases as exams approach and how this impacts students' motivation are lacking. Using Expectancy-Value Theory, this study longitudinally investigates changes in perceived TTT and academic motivation among N = 1855 secondary school students nearing graduation. Latent change score models revealed a significant increase in intrinsic motivation, importance, and grade self-efficacy but no influence of initial perceived TTT on motivational development. Perceived TTT increased significantly from grade 11 to 12, predicting changes in intrinsic motivation, importance, and utility but not perceived cost or self-efficacy. These findings challenge the belief that TTT inherently harms motivation, suggesting it may enhance some aspects of motivation when used strategically before exams. However, more studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms fully.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信