{"title":"金融压力、治理和地缘政治对欧洲能源转型矿产贸易的影响","authors":"Oleg Mariev , Md. Monirul Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how intra- and extra-territorial imports of energy transition minerals (ETMs) by the 27 Member States of the European Union respond to its energy transition parameters amidst the interplay of financial stress, mineral prices, electoral and political governance, and geopolitical turmoil. It utilizes monthly data from January 2004 to December 2023, also subdivided into two distinct periods covering the pre-Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2004–December 2021) and the Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2022–December 2023). The study applies the partial cross-quantilogram and wavelet local multiple correlation methods to manage heavy-tailed data characteristics. The findings indicate that Europe's ETM imports rise in line with the transition to clean energy despite volatility shocks from mineral prices and geopolitical events across all three periods. The combined effect of financial stress and ETM prices negatively affects Europe's mineral imports in bull markets, particularly due to volatility shocks during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. In contrast, the interaction between electoral and political governance and geopolitics positively influences mineral imports, again except during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. This study contributes to disentangling the transmission and volatility effects of pricing and geopolitical risk issues within the modeling framework. Finally, this research emphasizes the need for strategic resource management, risk mitigation, and improved governance to support Europe's mineral trade-driven energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 108523"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of financial stress, governance, and geopolitics on Europe's energy transition mineral trade\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Mariev , Md. Monirul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates how intra- and extra-territorial imports of energy transition minerals (ETMs) by the 27 Member States of the European Union respond to its energy transition parameters amidst the interplay of financial stress, mineral prices, electoral and political governance, and geopolitical turmoil. It utilizes monthly data from January 2004 to December 2023, also subdivided into two distinct periods covering the pre-Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2004–December 2021) and the Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2022–December 2023). The study applies the partial cross-quantilogram and wavelet local multiple correlation methods to manage heavy-tailed data characteristics. The findings indicate that Europe's ETM imports rise in line with the transition to clean energy despite volatility shocks from mineral prices and geopolitical events across all three periods. The combined effect of financial stress and ETM prices negatively affects Europe's mineral imports in bull markets, particularly due to volatility shocks during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. In contrast, the interaction between electoral and political governance and geopolitics positively influences mineral imports, again except during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. This study contributes to disentangling the transmission and volatility effects of pricing and geopolitical risk issues within the modeling framework. Finally, this research emphasizes the need for strategic resource management, risk mitigation, and improved governance to support Europe's mineral trade-driven energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003470\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of financial stress, governance, and geopolitics on Europe's energy transition mineral trade
This study investigates how intra- and extra-territorial imports of energy transition minerals (ETMs) by the 27 Member States of the European Union respond to its energy transition parameters amidst the interplay of financial stress, mineral prices, electoral and political governance, and geopolitical turmoil. It utilizes monthly data from January 2004 to December 2023, also subdivided into two distinct periods covering the pre-Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2004–December 2021) and the Russia-Ukraine crisis period (January 2022–December 2023). The study applies the partial cross-quantilogram and wavelet local multiple correlation methods to manage heavy-tailed data characteristics. The findings indicate that Europe's ETM imports rise in line with the transition to clean energy despite volatility shocks from mineral prices and geopolitical events across all three periods. The combined effect of financial stress and ETM prices negatively affects Europe's mineral imports in bull markets, particularly due to volatility shocks during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. In contrast, the interaction between electoral and political governance and geopolitics positively influences mineral imports, again except during the Russia-Ukraine crisis period. This study contributes to disentangling the transmission and volatility effects of pricing and geopolitical risk issues within the modeling framework. Finally, this research emphasizes the need for strategic resource management, risk mitigation, and improved governance to support Europe's mineral trade-driven energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.