弥合生态系统服务供需失衡:长江中游城市群空间流动格局与驱动力

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiaowen Zhou , Xuesong Zhang , Hongjie Peng , Wei Ren , Qiuyu Zou
{"title":"弥合生态系统服务供需失衡:长江中游城市群空间流动格局与驱动力","authors":"Xiaowen Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuesong Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongjie Peng ,&nbsp;Wei Ren ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has intensified ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand imbalances in urban agglomerations, particularly for food production (FP), water yield (WY), and carbon sequestration (CS). This study analyzes spatial flow patterns and driving forces of these critical services in China’s Yangtze River Midstream Urban Agglomeration (YRMA, 2000–2020). Using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) for supply–demand quantification and spatial models (Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area, Breakpoint-Field Strength model) for ecosystem service flows (ESF) simulation. The Geo-Detector model was applied to identify key drivers of flow volume and direction from natural conditions, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic perspectives. We identified three key findings: (1) Temporal analysis of the supply–demand balance index (SDI) revealed divergent trends, with FP showing steady growth, WY demonstrating fluctuating increases, and CS experiencing continuous decline. Spatially, 82 % of supply–demand imbalances concentrated in core urban areas, with spatial extents progressively expanding. (2) FP flow (FPF) initial flows mitigated local deficits (77,100 t max), enhanced by cross-regional transfers (270,500 t max), while WY flow (WYF) covered 48 % of the entire study area and CS flow (CSF) served only 37 % of imbalanced zones, both limited by non-selective flows. (3) Driving forces displayed specific patterns: FPF was influenced by multiple factors, WYF was primarily socio-economically driven, and CSF was mainly determined by natural conditions. These findings offer critical insights for balancing ESs and guiding ecological policies in urban agglomerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113531"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance: Spatial flow patterns and driving forces in the Yangtze River midstream urban agglomeration, China\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowen Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuesong Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongjie Peng ,&nbsp;Wei Ren ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has intensified ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand imbalances in urban agglomerations, particularly for food production (FP), water yield (WY), and carbon sequestration (CS). This study analyzes spatial flow patterns and driving forces of these critical services in China’s Yangtze River Midstream Urban Agglomeration (YRMA, 2000–2020). Using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) for supply–demand quantification and spatial models (Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area, Breakpoint-Field Strength model) for ecosystem service flows (ESF) simulation. The Geo-Detector model was applied to identify key drivers of flow volume and direction from natural conditions, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic perspectives. We identified three key findings: (1) Temporal analysis of the supply–demand balance index (SDI) revealed divergent trends, with FP showing steady growth, WY demonstrating fluctuating increases, and CS experiencing continuous decline. Spatially, 82 % of supply–demand imbalances concentrated in core urban areas, with spatial extents progressively expanding. (2) FP flow (FPF) initial flows mitigated local deficits (77,100 t max), enhanced by cross-regional transfers (270,500 t max), while WY flow (WYF) covered 48 % of the entire study area and CS flow (CSF) served only 37 % of imbalanced zones, both limited by non-selective flows. (3) Driving forces displayed specific patterns: FPF was influenced by multiple factors, WYF was primarily socio-economically driven, and CSF was mainly determined by natural conditions. These findings offer critical insights for balancing ESs and guiding ecological policies in urban agglomerations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004613\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速城市化加剧了城市群生态系统服务(ES)的供需失衡,特别是粮食生产(FP)、水量(WY)和碳封存(CS)。本文以长江中游城市群为研究对象,分析了长江中游城市群关键服务的空间流动特征及其驱动力。利用生态系统服务综合评价和权衡模型(InVEST)进行供需量化,利用空间模型(高斯两步浮动集水区、断点-场强模型)进行生态系统服务流(ESF)模拟。应用Geo-Detector模型从自然条件、景观特征和社会经济角度确定流量和方向的关键驱动因素。我们确定了三个关键发现:(1)供需平衡指数(SDI)的时间分析显示出不同的趋势,FP呈现稳定增长,WY呈现波动增长,CS呈现持续下降。空间上,82%的供需失衡集中在核心城区,且空间范围逐步扩大。(2) FP流(FPF)缓解了局部赤字(77,100 t max),并被跨区域转移(270,500 t max)增强,而WY流(WYF)覆盖了整个研究区域的48%,CS流(CSF)仅服务于37%的不平衡区,两者都受到非选择性流动的限制。(3)驱动力表现出一定的规律,FPF受多种因素影响,WYF主要受社会经济驱动,CSF主要受自然条件决定。这些发现为平衡ESs和指导城市群生态政策提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance: Spatial flow patterns and driving forces in the Yangtze River midstream urban agglomeration, China
Rapid urbanization has intensified ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand imbalances in urban agglomerations, particularly for food production (FP), water yield (WY), and carbon sequestration (CS). This study analyzes spatial flow patterns and driving forces of these critical services in China’s Yangtze River Midstream Urban Agglomeration (YRMA, 2000–2020). Using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) for supply–demand quantification and spatial models (Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area, Breakpoint-Field Strength model) for ecosystem service flows (ESF) simulation. The Geo-Detector model was applied to identify key drivers of flow volume and direction from natural conditions, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic perspectives. We identified three key findings: (1) Temporal analysis of the supply–demand balance index (SDI) revealed divergent trends, with FP showing steady growth, WY demonstrating fluctuating increases, and CS experiencing continuous decline. Spatially, 82 % of supply–demand imbalances concentrated in core urban areas, with spatial extents progressively expanding. (2) FP flow (FPF) initial flows mitigated local deficits (77,100 t max), enhanced by cross-regional transfers (270,500 t max), while WY flow (WYF) covered 48 % of the entire study area and CS flow (CSF) served only 37 % of imbalanced zones, both limited by non-selective flows. (3) Driving forces displayed specific patterns: FPF was influenced by multiple factors, WYF was primarily socio-economically driven, and CSF was mainly determined by natural conditions. These findings offer critical insights for balancing ESs and guiding ecological policies in urban agglomerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信