全基因组,部分人口:精准医学中的保护,代表和后殖民政治

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura E. Navne , Sarah Wadmann , Ingelise Olesen , Torben Hansen , Anne Cathrine B. Thuesen , Mette N. Svendsen
{"title":"全基因组,部分人口:精准医学中的保护,代表和后殖民政治","authors":"Laura E. Navne ,&nbsp;Sarah Wadmann ,&nbsp;Ingelise Olesen ,&nbsp;Torben Hansen ,&nbsp;Anne Cathrine B. Thuesen ,&nbsp;Mette N. Svendsen","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do researchers and clinicians assemble a rare diabetes population and navigate challenges of inclusion and exclusion built into the vision of precision medicine? Precision medicine envisions tailoring diagnoses and targeting treatment to the individual patients based on primarily genetic data. In this article, researchers across the disciplines of health and social science and across Denmark and Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) write together about how the multiple situational ethics operate simultaneously in the field of precision medicine and rare diseases. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in a large-scale Danish genomic research project called TRANSLATE in Denmark, this paper contributes with much needed knowledge of the day-to-day moral navigation of the intersections of protection and representation “on the ground” in precision medicine research. First, we explore the ethical concerns experienced in recruitment work in the Danish clinics and second, the particular ethical concerns arising when genetic researchers seek to include Greenlandic patients in their study population. We show that in the process of including and excluding patients, the researchers and clinicians come to feel stretched out between historical shadows of medical malpractice and colonial power and present day attempts to enhance public health. We end with a discussion of possible ways forward in the complex landscape of genomic data politics pointing to the possibilities as well as the limits of citizen engagement and collaborative approaches to data governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 117998"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole genome, part population: Protection, representation and postcolonial politics in precision medicine\",\"authors\":\"Laura E. Navne ,&nbsp;Sarah Wadmann ,&nbsp;Ingelise Olesen ,&nbsp;Torben Hansen ,&nbsp;Anne Cathrine B. Thuesen ,&nbsp;Mette N. Svendsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How do researchers and clinicians assemble a rare diabetes population and navigate challenges of inclusion and exclusion built into the vision of precision medicine? Precision medicine envisions tailoring diagnoses and targeting treatment to the individual patients based on primarily genetic data. In this article, researchers across the disciplines of health and social science and across Denmark and Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) write together about how the multiple situational ethics operate simultaneously in the field of precision medicine and rare diseases. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in a large-scale Danish genomic research project called TRANSLATE in Denmark, this paper contributes with much needed knowledge of the day-to-day moral navigation of the intersections of protection and representation “on the ground” in precision medicine research. First, we explore the ethical concerns experienced in recruitment work in the Danish clinics and second, the particular ethical concerns arising when genetic researchers seek to include Greenlandic patients in their study population. We show that in the process of including and excluding patients, the researchers and clinicians come to feel stretched out between historical shadows of medical malpractice and colonial power and present day attempts to enhance public health. We end with a discussion of possible ways forward in the complex landscape of genomic data politics pointing to the possibilities as well as the limits of citizen engagement and collaborative approaches to data governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"376 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员和临床医生如何汇集罕见的糖尿病人群,如何应对精准医疗愿景中包含和排除的挑战?精准医学设想根据主要的基因数据对个体患者进行定制诊断和靶向治疗。在这篇文章中,来自健康和社会科学各学科以及丹麦和Kalaallit Nunaat(格陵兰)的研究人员共同撰写了关于多重情境伦理如何在精准医学和罕见疾病领域同时运作的文章。基于丹麦一个名为“翻译”的大规模基因组研究项目的人种学田野调查,本文提供了精准医学研究中“实地”保护和代表交叉点的日常道德导航方面急需的知识。首先,我们探讨了在丹麦诊所招募工作中遇到的伦理问题,其次,当基因研究人员试图将格陵兰患者纳入其研究人群时,出现的特殊伦理问题。我们表明,在纳入和排除患者的过程中,研究人员和临床医生在医疗事故和殖民权力的历史阴影与当今加强公共卫生的尝试之间感到疲惫不堪。最后,我们讨论了在基因组数据政治的复杂环境中可能的前进道路,指出了公民参与和数据治理协作方法的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole genome, part population: Protection, representation and postcolonial politics in precision medicine
How do researchers and clinicians assemble a rare diabetes population and navigate challenges of inclusion and exclusion built into the vision of precision medicine? Precision medicine envisions tailoring diagnoses and targeting treatment to the individual patients based on primarily genetic data. In this article, researchers across the disciplines of health and social science and across Denmark and Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) write together about how the multiple situational ethics operate simultaneously in the field of precision medicine and rare diseases. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in a large-scale Danish genomic research project called TRANSLATE in Denmark, this paper contributes with much needed knowledge of the day-to-day moral navigation of the intersections of protection and representation “on the ground” in precision medicine research. First, we explore the ethical concerns experienced in recruitment work in the Danish clinics and second, the particular ethical concerns arising when genetic researchers seek to include Greenlandic patients in their study population. We show that in the process of including and excluding patients, the researchers and clinicians come to feel stretched out between historical shadows of medical malpractice and colonial power and present day attempts to enhance public health. We end with a discussion of possible ways forward in the complex landscape of genomic data politics pointing to the possibilities as well as the limits of citizen engagement and collaborative approaches to data governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信