Satoshi Ito, Jamie Bosch, Cecilia Aguilar-Vega, Norikazu Isoda, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Masuo Sueyoshi
{"title":"通过偏差校正栖息地模型优化野猪口服疫苗分配策略:以日本猪瘟控制为例","authors":"Satoshi Ito, Jamie Bosch, Cecilia Aguilar-Vega, Norikazu Isoda, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Masuo Sueyoshi","doi":"10.1155/tbed/1576080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Control of infectious diseases in wildlife is often considered challenging due to the limited availability of information. Some infectious diseases in wildlife can also affect livestock, posing significant problems for the animal farming industry. In Japan, classical swine fever (CSF) reemerged in September 2018. Given the availability of commercial vaccines, control measures mainly involve the vaccination of domestic pigs and the distribution of oral vaccines to wild boars. Despite these efforts, the disease continues to spread, primarily due to wild boars. This transmission is further exacerbated by Japan’s challenging geography—about 66% forested—making many areas difficult to access and leading to spatial bias in surveillance. As a result, the epidemic situation cannot be fully understood, limiting the effectiveness of control measures. This study estimated wild boar distribution using a species distribution model (SDM) that incorporates geographic bias correction. Two maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models—a standard model and a reporting bias-corrected model—were developed using wild boar observation data from Aichi Prefecture. Both models demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.946 and 0.946, sensitivity of 0.868 and 0.943, and specificity of 0.999 and 0.991), with the most influential variables identified in a similar order (solar radiation in November, followed by elevation, precipitation during the wettest quarter, and solar radiation in August). While both models identified high-probability areas in the east, the bias-corrected model also revealed expanded high-probability zones in the northeast. During the epidemic phases, protecting farms takes priority; however, in eradication phases, control measures must also target wild boar habitats in forested areas. By using open-access environmental data, this modeling approach can be applied to other regions. Accurate estimation of wild boar distribution can contribute to improving wildlife disease surveillance and optimizing oral vaccine delivery strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/1576080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Oral Vaccine Distribution Strategies for Wild Boars Through Bias-Corrected Habitat Modeling: A Case Study of Classical Swine Fever Control in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Ito, Jamie Bosch, Cecilia Aguilar-Vega, Norikazu Isoda, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Masuo Sueyoshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tbed/1576080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Control of infectious diseases in wildlife is often considered challenging due to the limited availability of information. Some infectious diseases in wildlife can also affect livestock, posing significant problems for the animal farming industry. In Japan, classical swine fever (CSF) reemerged in September 2018. Given the availability of commercial vaccines, control measures mainly involve the vaccination of domestic pigs and the distribution of oral vaccines to wild boars. Despite these efforts, the disease continues to spread, primarily due to wild boars. This transmission is further exacerbated by Japan’s challenging geography—about 66% forested—making many areas difficult to access and leading to spatial bias in surveillance. As a result, the epidemic situation cannot be fully understood, limiting the effectiveness of control measures. This study estimated wild boar distribution using a species distribution model (SDM) that incorporates geographic bias correction. Two maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models—a standard model and a reporting bias-corrected model—were developed using wild boar observation data from Aichi Prefecture. Both models demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.946 and 0.946, sensitivity of 0.868 and 0.943, and specificity of 0.999 and 0.991), with the most influential variables identified in a similar order (solar radiation in November, followed by elevation, precipitation during the wettest quarter, and solar radiation in August). While both models identified high-probability areas in the east, the bias-corrected model also revealed expanded high-probability zones in the northeast. During the epidemic phases, protecting farms takes priority; however, in eradication phases, control measures must also target wild boar habitats in forested areas. By using open-access environmental data, this modeling approach can be applied to other regions. Accurate estimation of wild boar distribution can contribute to improving wildlife disease surveillance and optimizing oral vaccine delivery strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/1576080\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/1576080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/1576080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Oral Vaccine Distribution Strategies for Wild Boars Through Bias-Corrected Habitat Modeling: A Case Study of Classical Swine Fever Control in Japan
Control of infectious diseases in wildlife is often considered challenging due to the limited availability of information. Some infectious diseases in wildlife can also affect livestock, posing significant problems for the animal farming industry. In Japan, classical swine fever (CSF) reemerged in September 2018. Given the availability of commercial vaccines, control measures mainly involve the vaccination of domestic pigs and the distribution of oral vaccines to wild boars. Despite these efforts, the disease continues to spread, primarily due to wild boars. This transmission is further exacerbated by Japan’s challenging geography—about 66% forested—making many areas difficult to access and leading to spatial bias in surveillance. As a result, the epidemic situation cannot be fully understood, limiting the effectiveness of control measures. This study estimated wild boar distribution using a species distribution model (SDM) that incorporates geographic bias correction. Two maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models—a standard model and a reporting bias-corrected model—were developed using wild boar observation data from Aichi Prefecture. Both models demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.946 and 0.946, sensitivity of 0.868 and 0.943, and specificity of 0.999 and 0.991), with the most influential variables identified in a similar order (solar radiation in November, followed by elevation, precipitation during the wettest quarter, and solar radiation in August). While both models identified high-probability areas in the east, the bias-corrected model also revealed expanded high-probability zones in the northeast. During the epidemic phases, protecting farms takes priority; however, in eradication phases, control measures must also target wild boar habitats in forested areas. By using open-access environmental data, this modeling approach can be applied to other regions. Accurate estimation of wild boar distribution can contribute to improving wildlife disease surveillance and optimizing oral vaccine delivery strategies.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.