十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)在全球水生和陆生生物群中的生物积累及其化学活性评价的毒理学意义

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kate M. Fremlin , Nicole Berg , Frank A.P.C. Gobas
{"title":"十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)在全球水生和陆生生物群中的生物积累及其化学活性评价的毒理学意义","authors":"Kate M. Fremlin ,&nbsp;Nicole Berg ,&nbsp;Frank A.P.C. Gobas","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many industrial substances cannot be assessed for their bioaccumulation potential using the octanol-water partition coefficient (<em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>), bioconcentration factor (BCF), or bioaccumulation factor (BAF) criteria typically used in the United Nations Stockholm Convention for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and in regulations and laws of many countries including Canada, the European Union (EU), the United States (US), and Japan. This presents an impediment to an efficient, effective, and expedient environmental assessment of many substances. However, the Stockholm Convention includes a second criterion for bioaccumulation assessments that is focussed on “<em>Evidence that a chemical presents other reasons for concern, such as high bio-accumulation in other species, high toxicity, or ecotoxicity</em>.” But this criterion has received little attention; is not recognized or used in national regulations; and lacks a framework for evaluation. This study investigates the application of this second criterion to (i) assess the bioaccumulation potential of difficult-to-test and difficult-to-evaluate substances that cannot be adequately evaluated with <em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>, BCF, or BAF due to very low aqueous solubility, ionization poor solubility in lipids, large molecular size, or other reasons; and (ii) present and test a framework for bioaccumulation assessments that aims to determine whether substances bioaccumulate to levels of concern. The framework is tested using evidence of bioaccumulation for decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE; CAS: 84852-53-9), which is a super-hydrophobic substance that is difficult to test in aqueous and dietary bioaccumulation tests. To evaluate DBDPE with this framework, we compiled bioaccumulation and toxicological data from the published literature, evaluated the exposure concentration data for quality, and applied a chemical activity-based evaluation. Our results indicate that based on available information to date, DBDPE does not appear to bioaccumulate to levels of concern that would affect environmental health at a global or local scale. The results also suggest that our evaluative framework may be a useful alternative for other super-hydrophobic and/or ionizing substances like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and/or aromatic brominated flame retardants that cannot be assessed for bioaccumulation potential based on <em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>, BCF, or BAF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"979 ","pages":"Article 179368"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioaccumulation of decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) in aquatic and terrestrial biota in the global environment and its toxicological significance assessed by chemical activity\",\"authors\":\"Kate M. Fremlin ,&nbsp;Nicole Berg ,&nbsp;Frank A.P.C. Gobas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many industrial substances cannot be assessed for their bioaccumulation potential using the octanol-water partition coefficient (<em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>), bioconcentration factor (BCF), or bioaccumulation factor (BAF) criteria typically used in the United Nations Stockholm Convention for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and in regulations and laws of many countries including Canada, the European Union (EU), the United States (US), and Japan. This presents an impediment to an efficient, effective, and expedient environmental assessment of many substances. However, the Stockholm Convention includes a second criterion for bioaccumulation assessments that is focussed on “<em>Evidence that a chemical presents other reasons for concern, such as high bio-accumulation in other species, high toxicity, or ecotoxicity</em>.” But this criterion has received little attention; is not recognized or used in national regulations; and lacks a framework for evaluation. This study investigates the application of this second criterion to (i) assess the bioaccumulation potential of difficult-to-test and difficult-to-evaluate substances that cannot be adequately evaluated with <em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>, BCF, or BAF due to very low aqueous solubility, ionization poor solubility in lipids, large molecular size, or other reasons; and (ii) present and test a framework for bioaccumulation assessments that aims to determine whether substances bioaccumulate to levels of concern. The framework is tested using evidence of bioaccumulation for decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE; CAS: 84852-53-9), which is a super-hydrophobic substance that is difficult to test in aqueous and dietary bioaccumulation tests. To evaluate DBDPE with this framework, we compiled bioaccumulation and toxicological data from the published literature, evaluated the exposure concentration data for quality, and applied a chemical activity-based evaluation. Our results indicate that based on available information to date, DBDPE does not appear to bioaccumulate to levels of concern that would affect environmental health at a global or local scale. The results also suggest that our evaluative framework may be a useful alternative for other super-hydrophobic and/or ionizing substances like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and/or aromatic brominated flame retardants that cannot be assessed for bioaccumulation potential based on <em>K</em><sub>OW</sub>, BCF, or BAF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"979 \",\"pages\":\"Article 179368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多工业物质不能使用辛醇-水分配系数(KOW)、生物浓缩因子(BCF)或生物积累因子(BAF)标准来评估其生物积累潜力,这些标准通常用于联合国关于持久性有机污染物(POPs)的斯德哥尔摩公约以及包括加拿大、欧盟(EU)、美国(US)和日本在内的许多国家的法规和法律。这阻碍了对许多物质进行高效、有效和方便的环境评估。然而,《斯德哥尔摩公约》包括了生物积累评估的第二个标准,该标准侧重于“证据表明化学品存在其他值得关注的原因,例如在其他物种中的高生物积累,高毒性或生态毒性。”但这一标准很少受到关注;未被国家法规认可或使用的;而且缺乏评估的框架。本研究调查了第二个标准在以下方面的应用:(i)评估难以测试和难以评估的物质的生物蓄积潜力,这些物质由于水溶性极低、电离性极低、在脂质中溶解度差、大分子尺寸或其他原因而无法用KOW、BCF或BAF充分评估;(ii)提出并测试生物积累评估框架,旨在确定物质的生物积累是否达到值得关注的水平。使用十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)的生物积累证据对框架进行了测试;CAS: 84852-53-9),这是一种超疏水物质,很难在水和膳食生物积累试验中进行测试。为了在此框架下评估DBDPE,我们从已发表的文献中收集了生物积累和毒理学数据,评估了暴露浓度数据的质量,并应用了基于化学活性的评估。我们的研究结果表明,根据迄今为止的现有信息,DBDPE似乎没有生物积累到会影响全球或地方范围内环境健康的关注水平。结果还表明,我们的评估框架可能是其他超疏水和/或电离物质的有用替代方案,如全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质和/或芳香溴化阻燃剂,这些物质无法根据KOW、BCF或BAF评估生物积累潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bioaccumulation of decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) in aquatic and terrestrial biota in the global environment and its toxicological significance assessed by chemical activity

Bioaccumulation of decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) in aquatic and terrestrial biota in the global environment and its toxicological significance assessed by chemical activity
Many industrial substances cannot be assessed for their bioaccumulation potential using the octanol-water partition coefficient (KOW), bioconcentration factor (BCF), or bioaccumulation factor (BAF) criteria typically used in the United Nations Stockholm Convention for Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and in regulations and laws of many countries including Canada, the European Union (EU), the United States (US), and Japan. This presents an impediment to an efficient, effective, and expedient environmental assessment of many substances. However, the Stockholm Convention includes a second criterion for bioaccumulation assessments that is focussed on “Evidence that a chemical presents other reasons for concern, such as high bio-accumulation in other species, high toxicity, or ecotoxicity.” But this criterion has received little attention; is not recognized or used in national regulations; and lacks a framework for evaluation. This study investigates the application of this second criterion to (i) assess the bioaccumulation potential of difficult-to-test and difficult-to-evaluate substances that cannot be adequately evaluated with KOW, BCF, or BAF due to very low aqueous solubility, ionization poor solubility in lipids, large molecular size, or other reasons; and (ii) present and test a framework for bioaccumulation assessments that aims to determine whether substances bioaccumulate to levels of concern. The framework is tested using evidence of bioaccumulation for decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE; CAS: 84852-53-9), which is a super-hydrophobic substance that is difficult to test in aqueous and dietary bioaccumulation tests. To evaluate DBDPE with this framework, we compiled bioaccumulation and toxicological data from the published literature, evaluated the exposure concentration data for quality, and applied a chemical activity-based evaluation. Our results indicate that based on available information to date, DBDPE does not appear to bioaccumulate to levels of concern that would affect environmental health at a global or local scale. The results also suggest that our evaluative framework may be a useful alternative for other super-hydrophobic and/or ionizing substances like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and/or aromatic brominated flame retardants that cannot be assessed for bioaccumulation potential based on KOW, BCF, or BAF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信