Ashraf M. Zaki , Mohamed E. Zayed , Mohamed H.S. Bargal , Ahmed Gaber H. Saif , Huanxin Chen , Shafiqur Rehman , Luai M. Alhems , El-Sadek H. Nour El-deen
{"title":"办公楼暖通空调系统的环境和能源性能分析:用于空调和照明设施节能的机器学习策略","authors":"Ashraf M. Zaki , Mohamed E. Zayed , Mohamed H.S. Bargal , Ahmed Gaber H. Saif , Huanxin Chen , Shafiqur Rehman , Luai M. Alhems , El-Sadek H. Nour El-deen","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>HVAC systems consume around 40 % of a building’s energy, making them a primary target for reducing energy use and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Traditional optimization and fault detection methods may no longer meet critical efficiency and thermal comfort standards. Artificial intelligence models, supported by improved sensor technology, offer powerful solutions by leveraging large datasets. This study thoroughly examines various energy consumption prediction methods, advancing from traditional analytical models to boosted-ensembled machine learning techniques. Four different regression tree models, including K-Nearest Neighbors Regression (K-NN), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Voting Hybrid Regression (VHR), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Regression (MLPR), are utilized to predict energy consumption for HVAC and lighting in office buildings. The study uses real meteorological information and office building energy consumption based on two years of historical energy use data. Moreover, eight distinct statistical indicators are used to evaluate the robustness of the four models. The study also analyzes how different features, such as building location, size, and weather variables, affect each model's ability to improve long-term energy consumption forecasting. The results demonstrate that the ETR approach provides the highest prediction accuracy, followed closely by VHR and MPLR, whereas KNN shows the lowest accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R²) and the root mean square error (RMSE) for predicting HVAC energy consumption are 0.9943 and 0.4352 for ETR and 0.9943 and 0.4500 for VHR, respectively. Contradictively, KNN displays values of 0.988 for R² and 0.586 for RMSE, underscoring a clear performance hierarchy among these predictive methods. Conclusively, the ETR method emerges as a powerful optimization tool for accurately predicting the energy consumption of HVAC and lighting in office buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107214"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and energy performance analyses of HVAC systems in office buildings using boosted ensembled regression trees: Machine learning strategy for energy saving of air conditioning and lighting facilities\",\"authors\":\"Ashraf M. Zaki , Mohamed E. Zayed , Mohamed H.S. Bargal , Ahmed Gaber H. Saif , Huanxin Chen , Shafiqur Rehman , Luai M. Alhems , El-Sadek H. Nour El-deen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>HVAC systems consume around 40 % of a building’s energy, making them a primary target for reducing energy use and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Traditional optimization and fault detection methods may no longer meet critical efficiency and thermal comfort standards. Artificial intelligence models, supported by improved sensor technology, offer powerful solutions by leveraging large datasets. This study thoroughly examines various energy consumption prediction methods, advancing from traditional analytical models to boosted-ensembled machine learning techniques. Four different regression tree models, including K-Nearest Neighbors Regression (K-NN), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Voting Hybrid Regression (VHR), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Regression (MLPR), are utilized to predict energy consumption for HVAC and lighting in office buildings. The study uses real meteorological information and office building energy consumption based on two years of historical energy use data. Moreover, eight distinct statistical indicators are used to evaluate the robustness of the four models. The study also analyzes how different features, such as building location, size, and weather variables, affect each model's ability to improve long-term energy consumption forecasting. The results demonstrate that the ETR approach provides the highest prediction accuracy, followed closely by VHR and MPLR, whereas KNN shows the lowest accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R²) and the root mean square error (RMSE) for predicting HVAC energy consumption are 0.9943 and 0.4352 for ETR and 0.9943 and 0.4500 for VHR, respectively. Contradictively, KNN displays values of 0.988 for R² and 0.586 for RMSE, underscoring a clear performance hierarchy among these predictive methods. Conclusively, the ETR method emerges as a powerful optimization tool for accurately predicting the energy consumption of HVAC and lighting in office buildings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025004811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025004811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental and energy performance analyses of HVAC systems in office buildings using boosted ensembled regression trees: Machine learning strategy for energy saving of air conditioning and lighting facilities
HVAC systems consume around 40 % of a building’s energy, making them a primary target for reducing energy use and CO2 emissions. Traditional optimization and fault detection methods may no longer meet critical efficiency and thermal comfort standards. Artificial intelligence models, supported by improved sensor technology, offer powerful solutions by leveraging large datasets. This study thoroughly examines various energy consumption prediction methods, advancing from traditional analytical models to boosted-ensembled machine learning techniques. Four different regression tree models, including K-Nearest Neighbors Regression (K-NN), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Voting Hybrid Regression (VHR), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Regression (MLPR), are utilized to predict energy consumption for HVAC and lighting in office buildings. The study uses real meteorological information and office building energy consumption based on two years of historical energy use data. Moreover, eight distinct statistical indicators are used to evaluate the robustness of the four models. The study also analyzes how different features, such as building location, size, and weather variables, affect each model's ability to improve long-term energy consumption forecasting. The results demonstrate that the ETR approach provides the highest prediction accuracy, followed closely by VHR and MPLR, whereas KNN shows the lowest accuracy. The coefficient of determination (R²) and the root mean square error (RMSE) for predicting HVAC energy consumption are 0.9943 and 0.4352 for ETR and 0.9943 and 0.4500 for VHR, respectively. Contradictively, KNN displays values of 0.988 for R² and 0.586 for RMSE, underscoring a clear performance hierarchy among these predictive methods. Conclusively, the ETR method emerges as a powerful optimization tool for accurately predicting the energy consumption of HVAC and lighting in office buildings.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.