人工湿地修复含磺胺类抗生素废水:植物的重要性及作用机制

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tong Zhou , Changzhou Yan , Ling Zhang , Guohui Zhang , Hongda Fang
{"title":"人工湿地修复含磺胺类抗生素废水:植物的重要性及作用机制","authors":"Tong Zhou ,&nbsp;Changzhou Yan ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Guohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongda Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been proved to be effective in treating sulfonamide antibiotics (SAs) wastewater. Nevertheless, as an essential element in CWs, the significance of plants, continues to be a topic of controversy. In this study, CWs with two different plant species were taken as the research object to investigate their treatment performance, in order to understand the impact of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs and to discover the underlying action mechanisms. Experiment results showed that plants played an important role in the CWs, and significantly improved the efficiency of wastewater treatment, with average removal rates for conventional nutrients (COD, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and TP) ranging from 73.69 % to 98.92 %, surpassing the non-plant control group (52.16 %–80.70 %). Similarly, for SAs, the removal efficiency in the plant-treated group was 74.15 %–83.67 %, higher than that in the non-plant control group (65.42 %–70.14 %). Although, as time passed, the efficacy of CWs had slightly decreased, but the rate of pollutant removal remained consistently over 60 %. Further analysis showed that plants promoted the removal of SAs through various mechanisms such as plant uptake, microbial degradation and substrate adsorption. Plants had the ability to absorb SAs from wastewater and eliminated them through metabolism or accumulation. Additionally, plants can improve soil enzyme activity to facilitate microbial degradation, indirectly promoting SAs removal. It's worth noting that most SAs can be degraded through plant metabolism after being absorbed by plants, while only a minority of SAs accumulated in plants in the form of parent compounds. Furthermore, the efficacy of CWs in treating wastewater differed between selected plant species. Specifically, <em>Iris pseudacorus</em> showed a higher purifing potential than <em>Scirpus validus</em>. These results revealed the effect of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs, and provided a reference for the practical application of antibiotic wastewater removal by CWs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 125520"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remediation of sulfonamide antibiotic-containing wastewater by constructed wetlands: Importance and action mechanism of plants\",\"authors\":\"Tong Zhou ,&nbsp;Changzhou Yan ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Guohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongda Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been proved to be effective in treating sulfonamide antibiotics (SAs) wastewater. Nevertheless, as an essential element in CWs, the significance of plants, continues to be a topic of controversy. In this study, CWs with two different plant species were taken as the research object to investigate their treatment performance, in order to understand the impact of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs and to discover the underlying action mechanisms. Experiment results showed that plants played an important role in the CWs, and significantly improved the efficiency of wastewater treatment, with average removal rates for conventional nutrients (COD, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and TP) ranging from 73.69 % to 98.92 %, surpassing the non-plant control group (52.16 %–80.70 %). Similarly, for SAs, the removal efficiency in the plant-treated group was 74.15 %–83.67 %, higher than that in the non-plant control group (65.42 %–70.14 %). Although, as time passed, the efficacy of CWs had slightly decreased, but the rate of pollutant removal remained consistently over 60 %. Further analysis showed that plants promoted the removal of SAs through various mechanisms such as plant uptake, microbial degradation and substrate adsorption. Plants had the ability to absorb SAs from wastewater and eliminated them through metabolism or accumulation. Additionally, plants can improve soil enzyme activity to facilitate microbial degradation, indirectly promoting SAs removal. It's worth noting that most SAs can be degraded through plant metabolism after being absorbed by plants, while only a minority of SAs accumulated in plants in the form of parent compounds. Furthermore, the efficacy of CWs in treating wastewater differed between selected plant species. Specifically, <em>Iris pseudacorus</em> showed a higher purifing potential than <em>Scirpus validus</em>. These results revealed the effect of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs, and provided a reference for the practical application of antibiotic wastewater removal by CWs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"383 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725014963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725014963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工湿地是处理磺胺类抗生素废水的有效方法。然而,作为化学武器的重要组成部分,植物的重要性仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究以两种不同植物种类的化粪池为研究对象,考察其处理性能,以了解植物对化粪池中砷废水处理的影响,并发现其潜在的作用机制。实验结果表明,植物在CWs中发挥了重要作用,显著提高了废水处理效率,对常规营养物(COD、NH4+-N、NO3−-N和TP)的平均去除率在73.69% ~ 98.92%之间,超过了非植物对照组(52.16% ~ 80.70%)。同样,植物处理组对sa的去除率为74.15% ~ 83.67%,高于非植物对照组(65.42% ~ 70.14%)。虽然随着时间的推移,化粪池的效果略有下降,但污染物去除率始终保持在60%以上。进一步分析表明,植物通过植物吸收、微生物降解和底物吸附等多种机制促进了砷的去除。植物具有从废水中吸收并通过代谢或积累消除砷的能力。此外,植物可以提高土壤酶活性,促进微生物降解,间接促进SAs的去除。值得注意的是,大部分sa被植物吸收后可通过植物代谢降解,只有少数sa以亲本化合物的形式在植物体内积累。此外,不同植物种类的水化液处理废水的效果也不同。其中,假鸢尾花的纯化潜力明显高于鸢尾花。这些结果揭示了植物对化粪池中砷废水的处理效果,为化粪池去除抗生素废水的实际应用提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Remediation of sulfonamide antibiotic-containing wastewater by constructed wetlands: Importance and action mechanism of plants

Remediation of sulfonamide antibiotic-containing wastewater by constructed wetlands: Importance and action mechanism of plants
Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been proved to be effective in treating sulfonamide antibiotics (SAs) wastewater. Nevertheless, as an essential element in CWs, the significance of plants, continues to be a topic of controversy. In this study, CWs with two different plant species were taken as the research object to investigate their treatment performance, in order to understand the impact of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs and to discover the underlying action mechanisms. Experiment results showed that plants played an important role in the CWs, and significantly improved the efficiency of wastewater treatment, with average removal rates for conventional nutrients (COD, NH4+-N, NO3-N and TP) ranging from 73.69 % to 98.92 %, surpassing the non-plant control group (52.16 %–80.70 %). Similarly, for SAs, the removal efficiency in the plant-treated group was 74.15 %–83.67 %, higher than that in the non-plant control group (65.42 %–70.14 %). Although, as time passed, the efficacy of CWs had slightly decreased, but the rate of pollutant removal remained consistently over 60 %. Further analysis showed that plants promoted the removal of SAs through various mechanisms such as plant uptake, microbial degradation and substrate adsorption. Plants had the ability to absorb SAs from wastewater and eliminated them through metabolism or accumulation. Additionally, plants can improve soil enzyme activity to facilitate microbial degradation, indirectly promoting SAs removal. It's worth noting that most SAs can be degraded through plant metabolism after being absorbed by plants, while only a minority of SAs accumulated in plants in the form of parent compounds. Furthermore, the efficacy of CWs in treating wastewater differed between selected plant species. Specifically, Iris pseudacorus showed a higher purifing potential than Scirpus validus. These results revealed the effect of plants on the treatment of SAs wastewater in CWs, and provided a reference for the practical application of antibiotic wastewater removal by CWs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信