国内某城市生活垃圾焚烧厂常规燃烧与化学循环燃烧多目标优化及技术经济分析

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Huimin Liu , Zhehao Jin , Ruijuan Mei , Min Li
{"title":"国内某城市生活垃圾焚烧厂常规燃烧与化学循环燃烧多目标优化及技术经济分析","authors":"Huimin Liu ,&nbsp;Zhehao Jin ,&nbsp;Ruijuan Mei ,&nbsp;Min Li","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114834"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective optimization and Techno-economic analyses of conventional combustion and chemical looping combustion for a Municipal solid waste incineration plant in China\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Liu ,&nbsp;Zhehao Jin ,&nbsp;Ruijuan Mei ,&nbsp;Min Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste management\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市生活垃圾焚烧发电是垃圾填埋处理的另一种选择,符合垃圾焚烧原则和循环经济。它会产生大量的污染物。例如,在常规燃烧(CC)中,烟气含有约21.34%的二氧化碳(CO2),造成环境污染。随着中国推进碳中和,二氧化碳排放量在电价决定中发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究比较了两种城市生活垃圾焚烧方法:CC和化学循环燃烧(CLC)捕获二氧化碳。采用非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-II),以总投资(TCI)和能源效率(EE)为目标进行多目标优化。还进行了全面的经济、金融、碳足迹和能源分析。结果表明,中CLC垃圾焚烧的TCI比CC垃圾焚烧高23.41%。然而,它将投资回收期缩短了5.91年,每年捕获1,073,200吨二氧化碳。CC垃圾焚烧的火用效率为23.64%,CLC垃圾焚烧的火用效率为14.36%。CC焚烧的发电效率达到44,094千瓦,而CLC焚烧的发电效率为29,562千瓦。研究结果为地方政府和投资者选择城市生活垃圾焚烧设施的最佳建设方式提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-objective optimization and Techno-economic analyses of conventional combustion and chemical looping combustion for a Municipal solid waste incineration plant in China

Multi-objective optimization and Techno-economic analyses of conventional combustion and chemical looping combustion for a Municipal solid waste incineration plant in China
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO2), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO2 emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO2 capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO2 annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信