{"title":"国内某城市生活垃圾焚烧厂常规燃烧与化学循环燃烧多目标优化及技术经济分析","authors":"Huimin Liu , Zhehao Jin , Ruijuan Mei , Min Li","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114834"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective optimization and Techno-economic analyses of conventional combustion and chemical looping combustion for a Municipal solid waste incineration plant in China\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Liu , Zhehao Jin , Ruijuan Mei , Min Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste management\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-objective optimization and Techno-economic analyses of conventional combustion and chemical looping combustion for a Municipal solid waste incineration plant in China
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration for power generation is an alternative to landfill treatment, adhering to WtE principles and circular economy. It generates significant pollutants. For instance, in conventional combustion (CC), the flue gas contains approximately 21.34 % carbon dioxide (CO2), contributing to environmental pollution. With the push for carbon neutrality in China, CO2 emissions play a vital role in electricity price determination. This study compares two MSW incineration methods: CC and chemical looping combustion (CLC) for CO2 capture. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA-II), multi-objective optimization is carried out with total capital investment (TCI) and exergy efficiency (EE) as objectives. Comprehensive economic, financial, carbon footprint, and exergy analyses are also conducted. The results show that CLC MSW incineration has a 23.41 % higher TCI than CC MSW incineration. However, it shortens the payback period by 5.91 years and captures 1,073,200 tonnes of CO2 annually. The exergy efficiency of CC MSW incineration is 23.64 %, while that of CLC MSW incineration is 14.36 %. The power generation rate of CC MSW incineration reaches 44,094 kW, compared to 29,562 kW for CLC MSW incineration. These results offer valuable references for local governments and investors when choosing the optimal construction method for MSW incineration facilities.
期刊介绍:
Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes.
Scope:
Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries
Covers various types of solid wastes, including:
Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial)
Agricultural
Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)