以细菌为基础的人工饲料调节两种害虫幼虫的发育、存活和肠道微生物群

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
A.O. Adesemoye , S. Antony-Babu , E.M. Nagy , B.D. Kafle , T.A. Gregory , C. Xiong , H.Y. Fadamiro
{"title":"以细菌为基础的人工饲料调节两种害虫幼虫的发育、存活和肠道微生物群","authors":"A.O. Adesemoye ,&nbsp;S. Antony-Babu ,&nbsp;E.M. Nagy ,&nbsp;B.D. Kafle ,&nbsp;T.A. Gregory ,&nbsp;C. Xiong ,&nbsp;H.Y. Fadamiro","doi":"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crop damage caused by insect pests results in substantial economic losses. The most widely used control methods, chemical pesticides, are losing efficacy and have deleterious environmental and health impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains blended as consortia for the management of insect pests through the impact on insect-gut microbiota. PGPR isolates were recovered from corn rhizosphere in Texas and characterized through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Eight strains belonging to diverse taxa selected through prescreening were combined in three different blends (consortia), added into an insect artificial diet, and fed to larvae of corn earworm (<em>Helicoverpa zea</em> [Boddie, 1850]) and tobacco budworm (<em>Chloridae virescens</em> [Fabricius, 1777]). Insect growth and development was monitored, and gut microbiota was assessed through direct isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing approaches. The inoculated diet resulted in significant reduction in larval weight for both insect species compared to the control and caused changes in the taxonomic diversity and evenness of <em>H. zea</em> gut microbiota. The results of the isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing were generally in agreement and showed a higher population and dominance of bacilli but less diversity of other taxa in PGPR blend treatments compared to control. While the mechanism of the changes in gut microbiota is currently unknown, understanding how to utilize bacterial strains to manipulate insect’s gut microbiota and health is important for developing sustainable pest management strategies. Future studies should elucidate the mechanisms and how to effectively deploy these findings for field applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8880,"journal":{"name":"Biological Control","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 105769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacteria-based artificial diets modulate larval development, survival and gut microbiota of two insect pests\",\"authors\":\"A.O. Adesemoye ,&nbsp;S. Antony-Babu ,&nbsp;E.M. Nagy ,&nbsp;B.D. Kafle ,&nbsp;T.A. Gregory ,&nbsp;C. Xiong ,&nbsp;H.Y. Fadamiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Crop damage caused by insect pests results in substantial economic losses. The most widely used control methods, chemical pesticides, are losing efficacy and have deleterious environmental and health impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains blended as consortia for the management of insect pests through the impact on insect-gut microbiota. PGPR isolates were recovered from corn rhizosphere in Texas and characterized through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Eight strains belonging to diverse taxa selected through prescreening were combined in three different blends (consortia), added into an insect artificial diet, and fed to larvae of corn earworm (<em>Helicoverpa zea</em> [Boddie, 1850]) and tobacco budworm (<em>Chloridae virescens</em> [Fabricius, 1777]). Insect growth and development was monitored, and gut microbiota was assessed through direct isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing approaches. The inoculated diet resulted in significant reduction in larval weight for both insect species compared to the control and caused changes in the taxonomic diversity and evenness of <em>H. zea</em> gut microbiota. The results of the isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing were generally in agreement and showed a higher population and dominance of bacilli but less diversity of other taxa in PGPR blend treatments compared to control. While the mechanism of the changes in gut microbiota is currently unknown, understanding how to utilize bacterial strains to manipulate insect’s gut microbiota and health is important for developing sustainable pest management strategies. Future studies should elucidate the mechanisms and how to effectively deploy these findings for field applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Control\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964425000799\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Control","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964425000799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虫害对农作物造成的损害导致了巨大的经济损失。最广泛使用的控制方法--化学农药--正在失去功效,并对环境和健康造成有害影响。本研究的目的是评估植物生长促进根瘤菌(PGPR)菌株作为联合菌株,通过对昆虫肠道微生物群的影响来治理害虫。从德克萨斯州的玉米根瘤菌群中分离出 PGPR 菌株,并通过 16S rRNA 基因测序对其进行鉴定。通过预筛选选出的属于不同类群的八种菌株被组合成三种不同的混合物(联合体),添加到昆虫人工饲料中,并喂给玉米穗虫(Helicoverpa zea [Boddie, 1850])和烟草芽虫(Chloridae virescens [Fabricius, 1777])幼虫。对昆虫的生长和发育进行了监测,并通过直接分离和 16S rRNA 测序方法对肠道微生物群进行了评估。与对照组相比,接种食物导致两种昆虫的幼虫体重显著下降,并导致 H. zea 肠道微生物群的分类多样性和均匀性发生变化。分离和 16S rRNA 测序的结果基本一致,表明与对照组相比,PGPR 混合处理中的芽孢杆菌数量较多,占优势,但其他类群的多样性较低。虽然肠道微生物群变化的机制目前尚不清楚,但了解如何利用细菌菌株来操纵昆虫的肠道微生物群和健康对于制定可持续的害虫管理策略非常重要。未来的研究应阐明这些机制以及如何有效地将这些发现应用于田间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacteria-based artificial diets modulate larval development, survival and gut microbiota of two insect pests
Crop damage caused by insect pests results in substantial economic losses. The most widely used control methods, chemical pesticides, are losing efficacy and have deleterious environmental and health impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains blended as consortia for the management of insect pests through the impact on insect-gut microbiota. PGPR isolates were recovered from corn rhizosphere in Texas and characterized through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Eight strains belonging to diverse taxa selected through prescreening were combined in three different blends (consortia), added into an insect artificial diet, and fed to larvae of corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea [Boddie, 1850]) and tobacco budworm (Chloridae virescens [Fabricius, 1777]). Insect growth and development was monitored, and gut microbiota was assessed through direct isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing approaches. The inoculated diet resulted in significant reduction in larval weight for both insect species compared to the control and caused changes in the taxonomic diversity and evenness of H. zea gut microbiota. The results of the isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing were generally in agreement and showed a higher population and dominance of bacilli but less diversity of other taxa in PGPR blend treatments compared to control. While the mechanism of the changes in gut microbiota is currently unknown, understanding how to utilize bacterial strains to manipulate insect’s gut microbiota and health is important for developing sustainable pest management strategies. Future studies should elucidate the mechanisms and how to effectively deploy these findings for field applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Control
Biological Control 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
220
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Biological control is an environmentally sound and effective means of reducing or mitigating pests and pest effects through the use of natural enemies. The aim of Biological Control is to promote this science and technology through publication of original research articles and reviews of research and theory. The journal devotes a section to reports on biotechnologies dealing with the elucidation and use of genes or gene products for the enhancement of biological control agents. The journal encompasses biological control of viral, microbial, nematode, insect, mite, weed, and vertebrate pests in agriculture, aquatic, forest, natural resource, stored product, and urban environments. Biological control of arthropod pests of human and domestic animals is also included. Ecological, molecular, and biotechnological approaches to the understanding of biological control are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信