Christopher J. Black, Carolina Olano, Eamonn M. M. Quigley, Alexander C. Ford
{"title":"肠易激综合征治疗中的常见误解和争议","authors":"Christopher J. Black, Carolina Olano, Eamonn M. M. Quigley, Alexander C. Ford","doi":"10.1038/s41575-025-01065-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite an increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in the context of abnormal gut–brain axis communication, and advances in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the disorder, there remain areas in which there are misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of IBS. This Perspective aims to highlight some of the most common misconceptions and controversies in IBS management, including those that the scientific literature has resolved, but for which further education of clinicians dealing with patients with IBS might be required to implement the findings from medical research. Areas of remaining contention are also discussed, as are suggestions as to how these issues could be addressed, both by advances in clinical practice and by further research. This Perspective discusses misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including diagnosis, testing and treatment, among others. Areas in which issues have been resolved and those that require further research and clarification are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":18793,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","volume":"22 7","pages":"517-526"},"PeriodicalIF":51.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common misconceptions and controversies in the management of irritable bowel syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J. Black, Carolina Olano, Eamonn M. M. Quigley, Alexander C. Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41575-025-01065-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite an increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in the context of abnormal gut–brain axis communication, and advances in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the disorder, there remain areas in which there are misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of IBS. This Perspective aims to highlight some of the most common misconceptions and controversies in IBS management, including those that the scientific literature has resolved, but for which further education of clinicians dealing with patients with IBS might be required to implement the findings from medical research. Areas of remaining contention are also discussed, as are suggestions as to how these issues could be addressed, both by advances in clinical practice and by further research. This Perspective discusses misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including diagnosis, testing and treatment, among others. Areas in which issues have been resolved and those that require further research and clarification are highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"22 7\",\"pages\":\"517-526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":51.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41575-025-01065-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41575-025-01065-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Common misconceptions and controversies in the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Despite an increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in the context of abnormal gut–brain axis communication, and advances in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the disorder, there remain areas in which there are misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of IBS. This Perspective aims to highlight some of the most common misconceptions and controversies in IBS management, including those that the scientific literature has resolved, but for which further education of clinicians dealing with patients with IBS might be required to implement the findings from medical research. Areas of remaining contention are also discussed, as are suggestions as to how these issues could be addressed, both by advances in clinical practice and by further research. This Perspective discusses misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including diagnosis, testing and treatment, among others. Areas in which issues have been resolved and those that require further research and clarification are highlighted.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology aims to serve as the leading resource for Reviews and commentaries within the scientific and medical communities it caters to. The journal strives to maintain authority, accessibility, and clarity in its published articles, which are complemented by easily understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Dedicated to providing exceptional service to authors, referees, and readers, the editorial team works diligently to maximize the usefulness and impact of each publication.
The journal encompasses a wide range of content types, including Research Highlights, News & Views, Comments, Reviews, Perspectives, and Consensus Statements, all pertinent to gastroenterologists and hepatologists. With its broad scope, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology ensures that its articles reach a diverse audience, aiming for the widest possible dissemination of valuable information.
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.