二次铂敏感复发卵巢癌的二次细胞减少手术:一项多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yuxi Zhao, Zhihao Jiang, Tao Guo, Meiting Cao, Jia Zeng, Rongshou Zheng, Yangchun Sun, Guangwen Yuan, Ning Li, Guihua Shen, Qiubo Lv, Linlin Ma, Yi Zhang, Hongwei Zhao, Jundong Li, Lingying Wu
{"title":"二次铂敏感复发卵巢癌的二次细胞减少手术:一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yuxi Zhao,&nbsp;Zhihao Jiang,&nbsp;Tao Guo,&nbsp;Meiting Cao,&nbsp;Jia Zeng,&nbsp;Rongshou Zheng,&nbsp;Yangchun Sun,&nbsp;Guangwen Yuan,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Guihua Shen,&nbsp;Qiubo Lv,&nbsp;Linlin Ma,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Hongwei Zhao,&nbsp;Jundong Li,&nbsp;Lingying Wu","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare survival outcomes between patients with ovarian cancer with platinum-sensitive recurrence (PSR) who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) at the first recurrence and those who underwent SCS at the second recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Multicentre cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Data were retrospectively collected from five hospitals in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with ovarian cancer who underwent SCS at either the first or second PSR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2), calculated from the time of recurrence to the next progression following SCS, were compared between the groups. Postsurgical complications were categorised according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>OS, PFS2, and postsurgical complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 231 patients included, 175 underwent SCS at the first PSR (Group 1) while 56 underwent SCS at the second PSR (Group 2). Complete resection was achieved in 84.0% of patients in Group 1 and 78.6% in Group 2. Postsurgical complication rates were similar between the groups. The median OS was not reached in Group 1, whereas Group 2 had a median OS of 77.3 months. Patients who underwent SCS at the second PSR had an OS comparable to that of those who underwent SCS at the first PSR. Multivariate analyses revealed that complete resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.120, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and optimal resection (HR = 0.228, <i>p</i> = 0.046) were independently associated with improved survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SCS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of whether it is performed at the first or second recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S4","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer With Second Platinum-Sensitive Recurrence: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Yuxi Zhao,&nbsp;Zhihao Jiang,&nbsp;Tao Guo,&nbsp;Meiting Cao,&nbsp;Jia Zeng,&nbsp;Rongshou Zheng,&nbsp;Yangchun Sun,&nbsp;Guangwen Yuan,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Guihua Shen,&nbsp;Qiubo Lv,&nbsp;Linlin Ma,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Hongwei Zhao,&nbsp;Jundong Li,&nbsp;Lingying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare survival outcomes between patients with ovarian cancer with platinum-sensitive recurrence (PSR) who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) at the first recurrence and those who underwent SCS at the second recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multicentre cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were retrospectively collected from five hospitals in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with ovarian cancer who underwent SCS at either the first or second PSR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2), calculated from the time of recurrence to the next progression following SCS, were compared between the groups. Postsurgical complications were categorised according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>OS, PFS2, and postsurgical complications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among the 231 patients included, 175 underwent SCS at the first PSR (Group 1) while 56 underwent SCS at the second PSR (Group 2). Complete resection was achieved in 84.0% of patients in Group 1 and 78.6% in Group 2. Postsurgical complication rates were similar between the groups. The median OS was not reached in Group 1, whereas Group 2 had a median OS of 77.3 months. Patients who underwent SCS at the second PSR had an OS comparable to that of those who underwent SCS at the first PSR. Multivariate analyses revealed that complete resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.120, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and optimal resection (HR = 0.228, <i>p</i> = 0.046) were independently associated with improved survival.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SCS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of whether it is performed at the first or second recurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 S4\",\"pages\":\"36-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18184\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较铂敏感复发(PSR)卵巢癌患者首次复发时接受二次细胞减灭术(SCS)与第二次复发时接受SCS的患者的生存结果。方法比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)和第二次进展时间(PFS2),计算时间从复发时间到SCS后的下一次进展时间。结果在纳入的 231 例患者中,175 例在第一次 PSR 时接受了 SCS(第 1 组),56 例在第二次 PSR 时接受了 SCS(第 2 组)。第一组有 84.0% 的患者实现了完全切除,第二组有 78.6% 的患者实现了完全切除。两组患者的术后并发症发生率相似。第 1 组未达到中位生存期,而第 2 组的中位生存期为 77.3 个月。第二次 PSR 时接受 SCS 的患者的 OS 与第一次 PSR 时接受 SCS 的患者相当。多变量分析显示,完全切除(危险比[HR] = 0.120,p = 0.002)和最佳切除(HR = 0.228,p = 0.046)与生存率的提高有独立关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer With Second Platinum-Sensitive Recurrence: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To compare survival outcomes between patients with ovarian cancer with platinum-sensitive recurrence (PSR) who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) at the first recurrence and those who underwent SCS at the second recurrence.

Design

Multicentre cohort study.

Setting

Data were retrospectively collected from five hospitals in China.

Population

Patients with ovarian cancer who underwent SCS at either the first or second PSR.

Methods

Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2), calculated from the time of recurrence to the next progression following SCS, were compared between the groups. Postsurgical complications were categorised according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system.

Main Outcome Measures

OS, PFS2, and postsurgical complications.

Results

Among the 231 patients included, 175 underwent SCS at the first PSR (Group 1) while 56 underwent SCS at the second PSR (Group 2). Complete resection was achieved in 84.0% of patients in Group 1 and 78.6% in Group 2. Postsurgical complication rates were similar between the groups. The median OS was not reached in Group 1, whereas Group 2 had a median OS of 77.3 months. Patients who underwent SCS at the second PSR had an OS comparable to that of those who underwent SCS at the first PSR. Multivariate analyses revealed that complete resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.120, p = 0.002) and optimal resection (HR = 0.228, p = 0.046) were independently associated with improved survival.

Conclusions

SCS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of whether it is performed at the first or second recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信