通过模拟微生物动力学和分类学提高对土壤甲烷过程的理解

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Shuhao Zhou, Gangsheng Wang, Wenjuan Huang, Kefeng Wang, Liping Zhang, Zehao Lv, Yajing Han, Shanshan Qi, Wei Zhang, Daifeng Xiang, Steven J. Hall
{"title":"通过模拟微生物动力学和分类学提高对土壤甲烷过程的理解","authors":"Shuhao Zhou, Gangsheng Wang, Wenjuan Huang, Kefeng Wang, Liping Zhang, Zehao Lv, Yajing Han, Shanshan Qi, Wei Zhang, Daifeng Xiang, Steven J. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions significantly impact climate change. However, microbial controls of CH<sub>4</sub> in global carbon cycle gain less attention than CO<sub>2</sub>, hindering the understanding of CH<sub>4</sub> processes. Here, stemming from a baseline model (MENDmm1) with one microbial group, we developed a microbial-explicit CH<sub>4</sub> model by representing six microbial groups following Michaelis-Menten kinetics (MENDmm6). We compared MENDmm6 with MENDfo6 (first-order kinetics) and MENDmm5 (excluding syntrophic acetate oxidation, SAO), alongside MENDmm1. Split-sample calibration and validation were conducted using high-temporal-resolution CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> effluxes from two soils (Oxisol and Mollisol) under five oxygen-fluctuation treatments. MENDmm6 (mean <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.66) improved CH<sub>4</sub> modeling by 47% over MENDmm1 (mean <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.45), with a 15% improvement for CO<sub>2</sub>. MENDmm6-simulated methanogenic and methanotrophic biomass closely matched observed OTU abundances (<em>r</em> = 0.69–0.94), except for methanotrophs in the Oxisol (<em>r</em> = 0.13). Furthermore, including microbial processes without explicit microbial kinetics (MENDfo6) did not improve model performance over MENDmm1. Neglecting SAO in MENDmm5 failed to explain the observed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis dominance. Our results emphasize the significance of explicit microbial communities and kinetics in CH<sub>4</sub> modeling. The proposed MENDmm6 model, leveraging molecular measurements of CH<sub>4</sub>-cycling microbes, will enhance predictions of management impacts on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, crucial for climate mitigation.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"31 1","pages":"109838"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced understanding of soil methane processes through modeling microbial kinetics and taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Shuhao Zhou, Gangsheng Wang, Wenjuan Huang, Kefeng Wang, Liping Zhang, Zehao Lv, Yajing Han, Shanshan Qi, Wei Zhang, Daifeng Xiang, Steven J. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions significantly impact climate change. However, microbial controls of CH<sub>4</sub> in global carbon cycle gain less attention than CO<sub>2</sub>, hindering the understanding of CH<sub>4</sub> processes. Here, stemming from a baseline model (MENDmm1) with one microbial group, we developed a microbial-explicit CH<sub>4</sub> model by representing six microbial groups following Michaelis-Menten kinetics (MENDmm6). We compared MENDmm6 with MENDfo6 (first-order kinetics) and MENDmm5 (excluding syntrophic acetate oxidation, SAO), alongside MENDmm1. Split-sample calibration and validation were conducted using high-temporal-resolution CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> effluxes from two soils (Oxisol and Mollisol) under five oxygen-fluctuation treatments. MENDmm6 (mean <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.66) improved CH<sub>4</sub> modeling by 47% over MENDmm1 (mean <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.45), with a 15% improvement for CO<sub>2</sub>. MENDmm6-simulated methanogenic and methanotrophic biomass closely matched observed OTU abundances (<em>r</em> = 0.69–0.94), except for methanotrophs in the Oxisol (<em>r</em> = 0.13). Furthermore, including microbial processes without explicit microbial kinetics (MENDfo6) did not improve model performance over MENDmm1. Neglecting SAO in MENDmm5 failed to explain the observed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis dominance. Our results emphasize the significance of explicit microbial communities and kinetics in CH<sub>4</sub> modeling. The proposed MENDmm6 model, leveraging molecular measurements of CH<sub>4</sub>-cycling microbes, will enhance predictions of management impacts on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, crucial for climate mitigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"109838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109838\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109838","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤甲烷(CH4)排放显著影响气候变化。然而,微生物在全球碳循环中对CH4的控制却没有CO2那样受到重视,这阻碍了对CH4过程的理解。在这里,基于一个微生物群的基线模型(MENDmm1),我们通过代表Michaelis-Menten动力学(MENDmm6)的六个微生物群,开发了一个微生物显式CH4模型。我们将MENDmm6与MENDfo6(一级动力学)和MENDmm5(不包括合成乙酸氧化,SAO)以及MENDmm1进行了比较。对两种土壤(Oxisol和Mollisol)在五种氧波动处理下的高时间分辨率CO2和CH4外排进行了分样校准和验证。MENDmm6(平均R2 = 0.66)比MENDmm1(平均R2 = 0.45)改善了47%的CH4建模,改善了15%的CO2建模。mendmm6模拟的产甲烷和产甲烷营养生物量与观测到的OTU丰度密切匹配(r = 0.69-0.94),除了Oxisol中的产甲烷菌(r = 0.13)。此外,与MENDmm1相比,包括没有明确微生物动力学的微生物过程(MENDfo6)并没有提高模型的性能。在MENDmm5中忽略SAO并不能解释所观察到的氢营养产甲烷优势。我们的研究结果强调了外显微生物群落和动力学在CH4建模中的重要性。拟议的MENDmm6模型利用CH4循环微生物的分子测量,将加强对管理对CH4排放影响的预测,这对减缓气候至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced understanding of soil methane processes through modeling microbial kinetics and taxonomy
Soil methane (CH4) emissions significantly impact climate change. However, microbial controls of CH4 in global carbon cycle gain less attention than CO2, hindering the understanding of CH4 processes. Here, stemming from a baseline model (MENDmm1) with one microbial group, we developed a microbial-explicit CH4 model by representing six microbial groups following Michaelis-Menten kinetics (MENDmm6). We compared MENDmm6 with MENDfo6 (first-order kinetics) and MENDmm5 (excluding syntrophic acetate oxidation, SAO), alongside MENDmm1. Split-sample calibration and validation were conducted using high-temporal-resolution CO2 and CH4 effluxes from two soils (Oxisol and Mollisol) under five oxygen-fluctuation treatments. MENDmm6 (mean R2 = 0.66) improved CH4 modeling by 47% over MENDmm1 (mean R2 = 0.45), with a 15% improvement for CO2. MENDmm6-simulated methanogenic and methanotrophic biomass closely matched observed OTU abundances (r = 0.69–0.94), except for methanotrophs in the Oxisol (r = 0.13). Furthermore, including microbial processes without explicit microbial kinetics (MENDfo6) did not improve model performance over MENDmm1. Neglecting SAO in MENDmm5 failed to explain the observed hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis dominance. Our results emphasize the significance of explicit microbial communities and kinetics in CH4 modeling. The proposed MENDmm6 model, leveraging molecular measurements of CH4-cycling microbes, will enhance predictions of management impacts on CH4 emissions, crucial for climate mitigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信