使用微生物产品控制猪浆中释放的氨和温室气体是否有潜在的好处?

Marianna Magyar, Márton Dencső, Anita Szabó, Eszter Tóth
{"title":"使用微生物产品控制猪浆中释放的氨和温室气体是否有潜在的好处?","authors":"Marianna Magyar,&nbsp;Márton Dencső,&nbsp;Anita Szabó,&nbsp;Eszter Tóth","doi":"10.1002/sae2.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Livestock farming and its slurry management represent a significant contributor to global anthropogenic ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, resulting in negative impacts on the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two microbial slurry additives (A1, A2) on the emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) as well as on the changes in chemical properties of slurry in a mesocosm experiment. Two different controls (C1 and C2) were established, due to differences in the methodology of the additives studied. Although the A1 treatment showed significantly (3.3 times) higher NH<sub>3</sub> emissions than the A2 treatment, it is not evident that the additive alone is responsible for the observed differences, as (3.5 times) higher NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were also detected in the control C1 treatment than in the C2. An opposite trend was observed for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, with higher average values in the A2 and C2 treatments. The differences can also be attributed to the different conditions in the use of the additive. Incubation of the A2 additive required additional water and maize grits, which diluted the slurry and changed its pH. The two additives had no impact on the emissions when compared to their respective control treatments. The results for CO<sub>2</sub> were more nuanced with no clear trends. The treatments had a significant effect on NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, whereas the weekly addition of pig slurry was the main contributing factor in the variation of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are There Potential Benefits From Using Microbial Products to Control Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Released From Pig Slurry?\",\"authors\":\"Marianna Magyar,&nbsp;Márton Dencső,&nbsp;Anita Szabó,&nbsp;Eszter Tóth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sae2.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Livestock farming and its slurry management represent a significant contributor to global anthropogenic ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, resulting in negative impacts on the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two microbial slurry additives (A1, A2) on the emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) as well as on the changes in chemical properties of slurry in a mesocosm experiment. Two different controls (C1 and C2) were established, due to differences in the methodology of the additives studied. Although the A1 treatment showed significantly (3.3 times) higher NH<sub>3</sub> emissions than the A2 treatment, it is not evident that the additive alone is responsible for the observed differences, as (3.5 times) higher NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were also detected in the control C1 treatment than in the C2. An opposite trend was observed for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, with higher average values in the A2 and C2 treatments. The differences can also be attributed to the different conditions in the use of the additive. Incubation of the A2 additive required additional water and maize grits, which diluted the slurry and changed its pH. The two additives had no impact on the emissions when compared to their respective control treatments. The results for CO<sub>2</sub> were more nuanced with no clear trends. The treatments had a significant effect on NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, whereas the weekly addition of pig slurry was the main contributing factor in the variation of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.70056\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.70056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.70056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业及其泥浆管理是全球人为氨(NH3)和温室气体(GHG)排放的重要来源,对环境造成负面影响。本研究旨在通过中观实验,评价两种微生物浆料添加剂(A1、A2)对NH3、CH4和CO2排放的影响以及对浆料化学性质变化的影响。由于所研究添加剂的方法不同,建立了两个不同的对照(C1和C2)。虽然A1处理的NH3排放量明显高于A2处理(3.3倍),但并不明显添加剂单独造成了所观察到的差异,因为对照C1处理的NH3排放量也比C2高(3.5倍)。CH4排放呈相反趋势,A2和C2处理的平均值较高。这种差异也可归因于添加剂使用条件的不同。A2添加剂的培养需要额外的水和玉米粉,这稀释了浆料并改变了其ph值。与各自的对照处理相比,两种添加剂对排放没有影响。二氧化碳的结果更加微妙,没有明确的趋势。各处理对NH3排放有显著影响,而每周添加猪浆是CO2和CH4排放变化的主要影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are There Potential Benefits From Using Microbial Products to Control Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Released From Pig Slurry?

Are There Potential Benefits From Using Microbial Products to Control Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Released From Pig Slurry?

Livestock farming and its slurry management represent a significant contributor to global anthropogenic ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, resulting in negative impacts on the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two microbial slurry additives (A1, A2) on the emissions of NH3, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) as well as on the changes in chemical properties of slurry in a mesocosm experiment. Two different controls (C1 and C2) were established, due to differences in the methodology of the additives studied. Although the A1 treatment showed significantly (3.3 times) higher NH3 emissions than the A2 treatment, it is not evident that the additive alone is responsible for the observed differences, as (3.5 times) higher NH3 emissions were also detected in the control C1 treatment than in the C2. An opposite trend was observed for CH4 emissions, with higher average values in the A2 and C2 treatments. The differences can also be attributed to the different conditions in the use of the additive. Incubation of the A2 additive required additional water and maize grits, which diluted the slurry and changed its pH. The two additives had no impact on the emissions when compared to their respective control treatments. The results for CO2 were more nuanced with no clear trends. The treatments had a significant effect on NH3 emissions, whereas the weekly addition of pig slurry was the main contributing factor in the variation of CO2 and CH4 emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信