{"title":"儿童希腊图式问卷的析因验证:社区和临床样本的比较","authors":"George Tsouvelas, Michaila Chondrokouki","doi":"10.1002/car.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study reexamined the organization of Young's 15 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) using confirmatory factors analyses based on different taxonomies of higher order schemas in children and adolescents. It also investigated whether there were any differences in EMS between community and clinical/residential samples. A Greek sample (<i>N</i> = 186) of 139 children living in the community and 47 children living in residential care (66.1% girls, aged 15.7 ± 1.4 years) completed the Greek version of the Schema Questionnaire for Children. We identified the single factor analysis as the most appropriate one in terms of interpretability and empirical indices. Regarding conditionality, the two-factor solution was partially validated. The clinical/residential sample presented statistically significantly higher scores on Dependence, Vulnerability to Harm, Emotional Deprivation, Insufficient Self-control, Conditional Schemas, Impaired Autonomy/Performance and Impaired Limits, in comparison to the community sample. Our results are consistent with the key theoretical assumptions underlying Schema Theory. Further research is required to substantiate these findings. Future research could use larger sized samples, consider different placements (residential care, foster families and kinship families) and implement longitudinal research designs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factorial Validation of the Greek Schema Questionnaire for Children: A Comparison of Community and Clinical Samples\",\"authors\":\"George Tsouvelas, Michaila Chondrokouki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/car.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study reexamined the organization of Young's 15 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) using confirmatory factors analyses based on different taxonomies of higher order schemas in children and adolescents. It also investigated whether there were any differences in EMS between community and clinical/residential samples. A Greek sample (<i>N</i> = 186) of 139 children living in the community and 47 children living in residential care (66.1% girls, aged 15.7 ± 1.4 years) completed the Greek version of the Schema Questionnaire for Children. We identified the single factor analysis as the most appropriate one in terms of interpretability and empirical indices. Regarding conditionality, the two-factor solution was partially validated. The clinical/residential sample presented statistically significantly higher scores on Dependence, Vulnerability to Harm, Emotional Deprivation, Insufficient Self-control, Conditional Schemas, Impaired Autonomy/Performance and Impaired Limits, in comparison to the community sample. Our results are consistent with the key theoretical assumptions underlying Schema Theory. Further research is required to substantiate these findings. Future research could use larger sized samples, consider different placements (residential care, foster families and kinship families) and implement longitudinal research designs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factorial Validation of the Greek Schema Questionnaire for Children: A Comparison of Community and Clinical Samples
This study reexamined the organization of Young's 15 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) using confirmatory factors analyses based on different taxonomies of higher order schemas in children and adolescents. It also investigated whether there were any differences in EMS between community and clinical/residential samples. A Greek sample (N = 186) of 139 children living in the community and 47 children living in residential care (66.1% girls, aged 15.7 ± 1.4 years) completed the Greek version of the Schema Questionnaire for Children. We identified the single factor analysis as the most appropriate one in terms of interpretability and empirical indices. Regarding conditionality, the two-factor solution was partially validated. The clinical/residential sample presented statistically significantly higher scores on Dependence, Vulnerability to Harm, Emotional Deprivation, Insufficient Self-control, Conditional Schemas, Impaired Autonomy/Performance and Impaired Limits, in comparison to the community sample. Our results are consistent with the key theoretical assumptions underlying Schema Theory. Further research is required to substantiate these findings. Future research could use larger sized samples, consider different placements (residential care, foster families and kinship families) and implement longitudinal research designs.
期刊介绍:
Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.