提出了一种新的抗剪配筋平板冲切抗力预测方法,并与最新规范规定进行了比较

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Lukáš Lyčka, Petr Štěpánek
{"title":"提出了一种新的抗剪配筋平板冲切抗力预测方法,并与最新规范规定进行了比较","authors":"Lukáš Lyčka,&nbsp;Petr Štěpánek","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of flat slabs in constructions is wide-spread due to its many functional and economic advantages. Behavior of flat slabs in shear and flexure is a complex problem and over the last decades several buildings have collapsed due to the failure of the punching shear strength, resulting in loss of lives and financial damages. These disasters revealed gaps in the current (or former) design codes and recommendations. A new method for predicting the punching shear strength of flat slabs with shear reinforcement has been developed. This method incorporates a simple system of struts and ties within the shear crack region while utilizing the current Eurocode 2 model for predicting the punching shear strength without shear reinforcement. The accuracy and safety of predictions of the newly developed method were evaluated against some of the major design codes and standards. Specifically, it was compared with the current Eurocode EN 1992, with the final proposition of the newly proposed Eurocode FprEN 1992, and with the method presented in Model Code 2020. This comparison was carried out using experimental data from load tests on flat slab specimens with shear reinforcement that were published in the scientific literature over the last half of a century. The newly developed method achieved the lowest coefficient of variation among all the compared methods while also obtaining the fewest prediction results that could be deemed unsafe due to overestimation of punching shear resistance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New method for prediction of punching resistance of flat slabs with shear reinforcement and its comparison with recently proposed code provisions\",\"authors\":\"Lukáš Lyčka,&nbsp;Petr Štěpánek\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of flat slabs in constructions is wide-spread due to its many functional and economic advantages. Behavior of flat slabs in shear and flexure is a complex problem and over the last decades several buildings have collapsed due to the failure of the punching shear strength, resulting in loss of lives and financial damages. These disasters revealed gaps in the current (or former) design codes and recommendations. A new method for predicting the punching shear strength of flat slabs with shear reinforcement has been developed. This method incorporates a simple system of struts and ties within the shear crack region while utilizing the current Eurocode 2 model for predicting the punching shear strength without shear reinforcement. The accuracy and safety of predictions of the newly developed method were evaluated against some of the major design codes and standards. Specifically, it was compared with the current Eurocode EN 1992, with the final proposition of the newly proposed Eurocode FprEN 1992, and with the method presented in Model Code 2020. This comparison was carried out using experimental data from load tests on flat slab specimens with shear reinforcement that were published in the scientific literature over the last half of a century. The newly developed method achieved the lowest coefficient of variation among all the compared methods while also obtaining the fewest prediction results that could be deemed unsafe due to overestimation of punching shear resistance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02649-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于具有许多功能和经济优势,平板在建筑中的应用广泛。平板在剪切和弯曲中的行为是一个复杂的问题,在过去的几十年里,由于冲孔抗剪强度的破坏,一些建筑物倒塌,造成了生命损失和经济损失。这些灾难揭示了当前(或以前)设计规范和建议中的缺陷。提出了一种新的抗剪配筋平板冲切抗剪强度预测方法。该方法在剪切裂缝区域内采用简单的杆系系统,同时利用现行的欧洲规范2模型来预测无剪切配筋的冲孔抗剪强度。根据一些主要的设计规范和标准,对新开发的方法进行了预测的准确性和安全性评估。具体而言,将其与现行的欧洲规范EN 1992、新提出的欧洲规范FprEN 1992的最终提案以及模型规范2020中提出的方法进行了比较。这种比较是使用在过去半个世纪的科学文献中发表的剪切加固平板试件的荷载试验数据进行的。在所有比较方法中,该方法的变异系数最低,同时由于对冲切阻力的过高估计而导致的不安全预测结果也最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New method for prediction of punching resistance of flat slabs with shear reinforcement and its comparison with recently proposed code provisions

The use of flat slabs in constructions is wide-spread due to its many functional and economic advantages. Behavior of flat slabs in shear and flexure is a complex problem and over the last decades several buildings have collapsed due to the failure of the punching shear strength, resulting in loss of lives and financial damages. These disasters revealed gaps in the current (or former) design codes and recommendations. A new method for predicting the punching shear strength of flat slabs with shear reinforcement has been developed. This method incorporates a simple system of struts and ties within the shear crack region while utilizing the current Eurocode 2 model for predicting the punching shear strength without shear reinforcement. The accuracy and safety of predictions of the newly developed method were evaluated against some of the major design codes and standards. Specifically, it was compared with the current Eurocode EN 1992, with the final proposition of the newly proposed Eurocode FprEN 1992, and with the method presented in Model Code 2020. This comparison was carried out using experimental data from load tests on flat slab specimens with shear reinforcement that were published in the scientific literature over the last half of a century. The newly developed method achieved the lowest coefficient of variation among all the compared methods while also obtaining the fewest prediction results that could be deemed unsafe due to overestimation of punching shear resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信