绘制生育轨迹:通过不孕症治疗黑人妇女生育经历和途径的黑暗叙事探究

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Isabel Morgan , Christine Tucker , Aunchalee E.L. Palmquist , Stephanie Baker , Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson , Chantel L. Martin , Natalie Hernandez , Lasha Clarke
{"title":"绘制生育轨迹:通过不孕症治疗黑人妇女生育经历和途径的黑暗叙事探究","authors":"Isabel Morgan ,&nbsp;Christine Tucker ,&nbsp;Aunchalee E.L. Palmquist ,&nbsp;Stephanie Baker ,&nbsp;Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson ,&nbsp;Chantel L. Martin ,&nbsp;Natalie Hernandez ,&nbsp;Lasha Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While existing literature has documented barriers and facilitators to Black women’s access to infertility treatment, scholars have a limited understanding of the experiences of Black women who have initiated medically assisted reproduction (MAR), including medicated timed intercourse, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Informed by Black feminism and reproductive justice, this endarkened narrative inquiry leveraged data from the Fertility Equity Study at Morehouse School of Medicine to characterize 41 Black women’s infertility treatment outcomes and examine their trajectories through fertility care and infertility treatment. Our analysis provides greater nuance and understanding to Black women’s experiences navigating systems of care to address challenges related to conceiving or maintaining a pregnancy. The results indicate a lack of fertility benefits and out-of-pocket expenses as significant barriers at each stage of the treatment pathway. There is a need for legislation that mandates private and public (e.g., Medicaid) health insurance coverage for fertility treatments and associated costs, inclusive of medication, genetic screening (and other ancillary testing), and donor gametes. Additionally, integration of culturally congruent providers (including mental health practitioners), addressing reproductive health conditions, and providing fertility awareness counseling throughout the life course may optimize Black women’s fertility care and MAR experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 118082"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping fertility trajectories: An endarkened narrative inquiry of Black women's fertility experiences and pathways through infertility treatment\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Morgan ,&nbsp;Christine Tucker ,&nbsp;Aunchalee E.L. Palmquist ,&nbsp;Stephanie Baker ,&nbsp;Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson ,&nbsp;Chantel L. Martin ,&nbsp;Natalie Hernandez ,&nbsp;Lasha Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While existing literature has documented barriers and facilitators to Black women’s access to infertility treatment, scholars have a limited understanding of the experiences of Black women who have initiated medically assisted reproduction (MAR), including medicated timed intercourse, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Informed by Black feminism and reproductive justice, this endarkened narrative inquiry leveraged data from the Fertility Equity Study at Morehouse School of Medicine to characterize 41 Black women’s infertility treatment outcomes and examine their trajectories through fertility care and infertility treatment. Our analysis provides greater nuance and understanding to Black women’s experiences navigating systems of care to address challenges related to conceiving or maintaining a pregnancy. The results indicate a lack of fertility benefits and out-of-pocket expenses as significant barriers at each stage of the treatment pathway. There is a need for legislation that mandates private and public (e.g., Medicaid) health insurance coverage for fertility treatments and associated costs, inclusive of medication, genetic screening (and other ancillary testing), and donor gametes. Additionally, integration of culturally congruent providers (including mental health practitioners), addressing reproductive health conditions, and providing fertility awareness counseling throughout the life course may optimize Black women’s fertility care and MAR experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"376 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004125\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然现有文献记录了黑人妇女获得不孕症治疗的障碍和促进因素,但学者们对开始医学辅助生殖(MAR)的黑人妇女的经历了解有限,包括药物定时性交,宫内人工授精和体外受精。在黑人女权主义和生殖正义的指导下,这项深入的叙事调查利用莫尔豪斯医学院生育公平研究的数据,对41名黑人女性的不孕症治疗结果进行了描述,并通过生育护理和不孕症治疗检查了她们的轨迹。我们的分析提供了更多的细微差别和理解黑人妇女的经验导航系统的护理,以解决有关怀孕或维持怀孕的挑战。结果表明,缺乏生育效益和自付费用是治疗途径每个阶段的重大障碍。有必要立法规定私人和公共(如医疗补助计划)医疗保险涵盖生育治疗和相关费用,包括药物、遗传筛查(和其他辅助检测)和供体配子。此外,整合文化上一致的提供者(包括心理健康从业者),解决生殖健康状况,并在整个生命过程中提供生育意识咨询,可能会优化黑人妇女的生育护理和MAR体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping fertility trajectories: An endarkened narrative inquiry of Black women's fertility experiences and pathways through infertility treatment
While existing literature has documented barriers and facilitators to Black women’s access to infertility treatment, scholars have a limited understanding of the experiences of Black women who have initiated medically assisted reproduction (MAR), including medicated timed intercourse, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Informed by Black feminism and reproductive justice, this endarkened narrative inquiry leveraged data from the Fertility Equity Study at Morehouse School of Medicine to characterize 41 Black women’s infertility treatment outcomes and examine their trajectories through fertility care and infertility treatment. Our analysis provides greater nuance and understanding to Black women’s experiences navigating systems of care to address challenges related to conceiving or maintaining a pregnancy. The results indicate a lack of fertility benefits and out-of-pocket expenses as significant barriers at each stage of the treatment pathway. There is a need for legislation that mandates private and public (e.g., Medicaid) health insurance coverage for fertility treatments and associated costs, inclusive of medication, genetic screening (and other ancillary testing), and donor gametes. Additionally, integration of culturally congruent providers (including mental health practitioners), addressing reproductive health conditions, and providing fertility awareness counseling throughout the life course may optimize Black women’s fertility care and MAR experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信