{"title":"改善产科肛门括约肌损伤后的信息质量可以改善肛门失禁妇女的生活质量","authors":"Venara Aurélien , Rebmann Emeline , Helbert Candice , Lemasson Florine , Legendre Guillaume , Hamel Jean-François","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To compare the information remembered by women about the potential risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS) according to the occurrence of anal incontinence and the time elapsed since the OASIS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective and observational monocentric cohort study included all the 227 women who had OASIS during a 15-years period. Information was collected using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, sent to participants by post, and by a phone interview about women’s memories of the information given.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>80 patients had at least one episode of anal incontinence (AI) (35.2 %). Patients remembered having received information about the risk of AI in 28.2 % (n = 64) and about the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) in 34.4 % (n = 78). 82.2 % (n = 188) stated that they would be interested in having information about AI and 84.6 % wanted information about UI.</div><div>Patients who received the information ≤ 5 years ago were more able to remember information about AI and UI than other patients. Being able to remember information about the risk of AI was significantly associated with a better quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients who had received information ≤ 5 years ago were able to remember more of it. This coincides with the implementation of a specific post-OASIS consultation and therefore advocates for such consultations becoming common practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"310 ","pages":"Article 113989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the quality of information after an obstetrical anal sphincter injury improves the quality of life for women experiencing anal incontinence\",\"authors\":\"Venara Aurélien , Rebmann Emeline , Helbert Candice , Lemasson Florine , Legendre Guillaume , Hamel Jean-François\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To compare the information remembered by women about the potential risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS) according to the occurrence of anal incontinence and the time elapsed since the OASIS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective and observational monocentric cohort study included all the 227 women who had OASIS during a 15-years period. Information was collected using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, sent to participants by post, and by a phone interview about women’s memories of the information given.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>80 patients had at least one episode of anal incontinence (AI) (35.2 %). Patients remembered having received information about the risk of AI in 28.2 % (n = 64) and about the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) in 34.4 % (n = 78). 82.2 % (n = 188) stated that they would be interested in having information about AI and 84.6 % wanted information about UI.</div><div>Patients who received the information ≤ 5 years ago were more able to remember information about AI and UI than other patients. Being able to remember information about the risk of AI was significantly associated with a better quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients who had received information ≤ 5 years ago were able to remember more of it. This coincides with the implementation of a specific post-OASIS consultation and therefore advocates for such consultations becoming common practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"310 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525002581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525002581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the quality of information after an obstetrical anal sphincter injury improves the quality of life for women experiencing anal incontinence
Background
To compare the information remembered by women about the potential risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS) according to the occurrence of anal incontinence and the time elapsed since the OASIS.
Methods
This prospective and observational monocentric cohort study included all the 227 women who had OASIS during a 15-years period. Information was collected using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, sent to participants by post, and by a phone interview about women’s memories of the information given.
Results
80 patients had at least one episode of anal incontinence (AI) (35.2 %). Patients remembered having received information about the risk of AI in 28.2 % (n = 64) and about the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) in 34.4 % (n = 78). 82.2 % (n = 188) stated that they would be interested in having information about AI and 84.6 % wanted information about UI.
Patients who received the information ≤ 5 years ago were more able to remember information about AI and UI than other patients. Being able to remember information about the risk of AI was significantly associated with a better quality of life.
Conclusion
Patients who had received information ≤ 5 years ago were able to remember more of it. This coincides with the implementation of a specific post-OASIS consultation and therefore advocates for such consultations becoming common practice.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.