德国和瑞典的自身利益和对气候相关交通政策措施的支持

IF 7.3 1区工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2025.104707

Wolfgang Habla , Kumai Kokash , Åsa Löfgren , Anna Straubinger , Andreas Ziegler

{"title":"德国和瑞典的自身利益和对气候相关交通政策措施的支持","authors":"Wolfgang Habla , Kumai Kokash , Åsa Löfgren , Anna Straubinger , Andreas Ziegler","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on survey data among citizens from Germany and Sweden, this paper examines the individual support for climate-related passenger transport policy measures. Our descriptive statistics reveal that pull policy measures are more strongly supported in both countries than push policy measures and bans. Our econometric analysis focuses on the relevance of economic self-interest, measured by indicators that are in line with the corresponding policy measure. Using multivariate ordered probit models, we show for both countries that citizens who are negatively affected by car-, air travel-, and bicycle-related policy measures are significantly more likely to disagree with them, while citizens who benefit from them are significantly more likely to support them. The corresponding estimated probability effects are substantial. For example, citizens who own or use a means of transport are estimated to be up to 21 percentage points less likely to support policy measures that negatively affect their ownership or use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104707"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-interest and support for climate-related transport policy measures in Germany and Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Habla , Kumai Kokash , Åsa Löfgren , Anna Straubinger , Andreas Ziegler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on survey data among citizens from Germany and Sweden, this paper examines the individual support for climate-related passenger transport policy measures. Our descriptive statistics reveal that pull policy measures are more strongly supported in both countries than push policy measures and bans. Our econometric analysis focuses on the relevance of economic self-interest, measured by indicators that are in line with the corresponding policy measure. Using multivariate ordered probit models, we show for both countries that citizens who are negatively affected by car-, air travel-, and bicycle-related policy measures are significantly more likely to disagree with them, while citizens who benefit from them are significantly more likely to support them. The corresponding estimated probability effects are substantial. For example, citizens who own or use a means of transport are estimated to be up to 21 percentage points less likely to support policy measures that negatively affect their ownership or use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001178\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于对德国和瑞典公民的调查数据，研究了个人对气候相关客运政策措施的支持情况。我们的描述性统计显示，在这两个国家，拉动型政策措施比推动型政策措施和禁令更受支持。我们的计量经济学分析侧重于经济自身利益的相关性，并通过与相应政策措施一致的指标进行衡量。通过使用多元有序概率模型，我们发现在这两个国家中，受到与汽车、航空旅行和自行车相关的政策措施负面影响的公民明显更有可能不同意这些政策措施，而受益于这些政策措施的公民则明显更有可能支持这些政策措施。相应的估计概率效应也很大。例如，拥有或使用交通工具的公民支持对其拥有或使用有负面影响的政策措施的可能性估计会降低 21 个百分点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Self-interest and support for climate-related transport policy measures in Germany and Sweden

Based on survey data among citizens from Germany and Sweden, this paper examines the individual support for climate-related passenger transport policy measures. Our descriptive statistics reveal that pull policy measures are more strongly supported in both countries than push policy measures and bans. Our econometric analysis focuses on the relevance of economic self-interest, measured by indicators that are in line with the corresponding policy measure. Using multivariate ordered probit models, we show for both countries that citizens who are negatively affected by car-, air travel-, and bicycle-related policy measures are significantly more likely to disagree with them, while citizens who benefit from them are significantly more likely to support them. The corresponding estimated probability effects are substantial. For example, citizens who own or use a means of transport are estimated to be up to 21 percentage points less likely to support policy measures that negatively affect their ownership or use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment 工程技术-运输科技

CiteScore

14.40

自引率

9.20%

发文量

314

审稿时长

39 days

期刊介绍： Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.