Kaleem S. Ahmed MD, MSAI, Clayton T. Marcinak MD, Sheriff M. Issaka BS, Muhammad Maisam Ali MBBS, Syed Nabeel Zafar MD, MPH, FACS
{"title":"机器学习预测胰十二指肠切除术后的早期死亡","authors":"Kaleem S. Ahmed MD, MSAI, Clayton T. Marcinak MD, Sheriff M. Issaka BS, Muhammad Maisam Ali MBBS, Syed Nabeel Zafar MD, MPH, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>About 25% of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for right-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) die within 1 y of diagnosis. These patients carry all the risks of significant morbidity with no survival advantage when compared to nonsurgical options. We aimed to determine if machine learning models have superior accuracy to traditional regression models at predicting futile surgery in patients with PDAC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing PD for PDAC between 2004 and 2020. PD was defined as futile if the patient died within 12 mo of cancer diagnosis. We trained predictive models using 80% of the dataset and 16 preoperative input variables. Models included logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting classifiers. Models were tested on a 20% test set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 66,331 patients identified, 34,260 (51.7%) were men, with a median age of 67 y (interquartile range, 59 to 74 y). A total of 16,772 (25.3%) patients met the criteria for futile surgery. The gradient boosting model outperformed other models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689, followed by logistic regression (0.679), random forest (0.675), and decision tree (0.664). Key predictors of futile PD included advanced age (> 79 y), tumor size ≥ 4 cm, and poor differentiation. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower futility risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrated the ability of machine learning models to predict the odds of futile PD with moderate accuracy. Although similar analyses are needed on more granular datasets, our study has important implications for shared decision-making and optimized care for patients with PDAC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"310 ","pages":"Pages 186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning to Predict Early Death Despite Pancreaticoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Kaleem S. Ahmed MD, MSAI, Clayton T. Marcinak MD, Sheriff M. Issaka BS, Muhammad Maisam Ali MBBS, Syed Nabeel Zafar MD, MPH, FACS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>About 25% of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for right-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) die within 1 y of diagnosis. These patients carry all the risks of significant morbidity with no survival advantage when compared to nonsurgical options. We aimed to determine if machine learning models have superior accuracy to traditional regression models at predicting futile surgery in patients with PDAC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing PD for PDAC between 2004 and 2020. PD was defined as futile if the patient died within 12 mo of cancer diagnosis. We trained predictive models using 80% of the dataset and 16 preoperative input variables. Models included logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting classifiers. Models were tested on a 20% test set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 66,331 patients identified, 34,260 (51.7%) were men, with a median age of 67 y (interquartile range, 59 to 74 y). A total of 16,772 (25.3%) patients met the criteria for futile surgery. The gradient boosting model outperformed other models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689, followed by logistic regression (0.679), random forest (0.675), and decision tree (0.664). Key predictors of futile PD included advanced age (> 79 y), tumor size ≥ 4 cm, and poor differentiation. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower futility risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrated the ability of machine learning models to predict the odds of futile PD with moderate accuracy. Although similar analyses are needed on more granular datasets, our study has important implications for shared decision-making and optimized care for patients with PDAC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"310 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning to Predict Early Death Despite Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Introduction
About 25% of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for right-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) die within 1 y of diagnosis. These patients carry all the risks of significant morbidity with no survival advantage when compared to nonsurgical options. We aimed to determine if machine learning models have superior accuracy to traditional regression models at predicting futile surgery in patients with PDAC.
Methods
We analyzed data from patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing PD for PDAC between 2004 and 2020. PD was defined as futile if the patient died within 12 mo of cancer diagnosis. We trained predictive models using 80% of the dataset and 16 preoperative input variables. Models included logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting classifiers. Models were tested on a 20% test set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier scores.
Results
Of the 66,331 patients identified, 34,260 (51.7%) were men, with a median age of 67 y (interquartile range, 59 to 74 y). A total of 16,772 (25.3%) patients met the criteria for futile surgery. The gradient boosting model outperformed other models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689, followed by logistic regression (0.679), random forest (0.675), and decision tree (0.664). Key predictors of futile PD included advanced age (> 79 y), tumor size ≥ 4 cm, and poor differentiation. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower futility risk.
Conclusions
We demonstrated the ability of machine learning models to predict the odds of futile PD with moderate accuracy. Although similar analyses are needed on more granular datasets, our study has important implications for shared decision-making and optimized care for patients with PDAC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.