风车指数能否作为经导管心脏瓣膜加速小叶变性的替代指标?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Dong Qiu, Ali N. Azadani
{"title":"风车指数能否作为经导管心脏瓣膜加速小叶变性的替代指标?","authors":"Dong Qiu,&nbsp;Ali N. Azadani","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcatheter heart valve (THV) replacement is an advancing field, with various valve designs incorporating features like flexible frames to improve valve hemodynamics, durability, and patient outcomes. Leaflet pinwheeling, a common metric, is thought to negatively impact long-term durability. This study investigates the pinwheeling index and its correlation with stress distribution across different THV designs. Three THV designs were created using an optimization framework, each with a nominal size of 26-mm and varying leaflet coaptation heights of 10-mm, 13-mm, and 16-mm. Each valve design was evaluated under two conditions: one with a rigid frame and one with a flexible frame. The valves were implanted with a 90 % area expansion ratio, and their performance was assessed by examining key mechanical parameters, including the pinwheeling index and maximum in-plane principal stress under a diastolic loading condition. At a coaptation height of 10-mm, the pinwheeling index was 0 % for both frame types. At 13-mm, the rigid frame maintained a low index of 2 %, while the flexible frame increased slightly to 4 %. At 16-mm, the index rose for both frames, with the rigid frame at 7 % and the flexible frame at 10 %. The study found that leaflet stress was unrelated to the pinwheeling index. While flexible frames may reduce stress and improve long-term durability, they increase the pinwheeling index. Therefore, the traditional pinwheeling index may not reliably predict accelerated leaflet degeneration across different valve designs in comparative analyses. A comprehensive evaluation incorporating computational modeling, digital image correlation, and experimental validation is crucial for preclinical assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 112731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the pinwheeling index serve as a surrogate for accelerated leaflet degeneration in transcatheter heart valves?\",\"authors\":\"Dong Qiu,&nbsp;Ali N. Azadani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transcatheter heart valve (THV) replacement is an advancing field, with various valve designs incorporating features like flexible frames to improve valve hemodynamics, durability, and patient outcomes. Leaflet pinwheeling, a common metric, is thought to negatively impact long-term durability. This study investigates the pinwheeling index and its correlation with stress distribution across different THV designs. Three THV designs were created using an optimization framework, each with a nominal size of 26-mm and varying leaflet coaptation heights of 10-mm, 13-mm, and 16-mm. Each valve design was evaluated under two conditions: one with a rigid frame and one with a flexible frame. The valves were implanted with a 90 % area expansion ratio, and their performance was assessed by examining key mechanical parameters, including the pinwheeling index and maximum in-plane principal stress under a diastolic loading condition. At a coaptation height of 10-mm, the pinwheeling index was 0 % for both frame types. At 13-mm, the rigid frame maintained a low index of 2 %, while the flexible frame increased slightly to 4 %. At 16-mm, the index rose for both frames, with the rigid frame at 7 % and the flexible frame at 10 %. The study found that leaflet stress was unrelated to the pinwheeling index. While flexible frames may reduce stress and improve long-term durability, they increase the pinwheeling index. Therefore, the traditional pinwheeling index may not reliably predict accelerated leaflet degeneration across different valve designs in comparative analyses. A comprehensive evaluation incorporating computational modeling, digital image correlation, and experimental validation is crucial for preclinical assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500243X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500243X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)置换术是一个不断发展的领域,各种瓣膜设计结合了灵活框架等特征,以改善瓣膜血流动力学、耐用性和患者预后。小叶风车,一个常见的度量,被认为对长期耐久性产生负面影响。本研究探讨了不同THV设计的风车指数及其与应力分布的关系。使用优化框架创建了三种THV设计,每种设计的标称尺寸均为26mm,单叶覆盖高度分别为10mm、13mm和16mm。每个阀门设计在两种条件下进行评估:一种是刚性框架,一种是柔性框架。植入面积膨胀率为90%的瓣膜,并通过检查关键力学参数,包括在舒张负荷条件下的风车指数和最大面内主应力来评估其性能。在覆盖高度为10mm时,两种机架类型的风车指数均为0%。在13毫米处,刚性框架保持了2%的低指数,而柔性框架略有增加,达到4%。在16毫米时,两种框架的指数都有所上升,刚性框架为7%,柔性框架为10%。研究发现,小叶应力与风车指数无关。而灵活的框架可以减少压力,提高长期耐用性,他们增加风车指数。因此,在比较分析中,传统的风车指数可能无法可靠地预测不同瓣膜设计的加速小叶退化。综合计算建模、数字图像相关和实验验证的综合评估对临床前评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the pinwheeling index serve as a surrogate for accelerated leaflet degeneration in transcatheter heart valves?
Transcatheter heart valve (THV) replacement is an advancing field, with various valve designs incorporating features like flexible frames to improve valve hemodynamics, durability, and patient outcomes. Leaflet pinwheeling, a common metric, is thought to negatively impact long-term durability. This study investigates the pinwheeling index and its correlation with stress distribution across different THV designs. Three THV designs were created using an optimization framework, each with a nominal size of 26-mm and varying leaflet coaptation heights of 10-mm, 13-mm, and 16-mm. Each valve design was evaluated under two conditions: one with a rigid frame and one with a flexible frame. The valves were implanted with a 90 % area expansion ratio, and their performance was assessed by examining key mechanical parameters, including the pinwheeling index and maximum in-plane principal stress under a diastolic loading condition. At a coaptation height of 10-mm, the pinwheeling index was 0 % for both frame types. At 13-mm, the rigid frame maintained a low index of 2 %, while the flexible frame increased slightly to 4 %. At 16-mm, the index rose for both frames, with the rigid frame at 7 % and the flexible frame at 10 %. The study found that leaflet stress was unrelated to the pinwheeling index. While flexible frames may reduce stress and improve long-term durability, they increase the pinwheeling index. Therefore, the traditional pinwheeling index may not reliably predict accelerated leaflet degeneration across different valve designs in comparative analyses. A comprehensive evaluation incorporating computational modeling, digital image correlation, and experimental validation is crucial for preclinical assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信