油气田地层水数据可信度评价方法及其影响因素

IF 7 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Wei LI, Wuren XIE, Saijun WU, Yanhua SHUAI, Xingzhi MA
{"title":"油气田地层水数据可信度评价方法及其影响因素","authors":"Wei LI,&nbsp;Wuren XIE,&nbsp;Saijun WU,&nbsp;Yanhua SHUAI,&nbsp;Xingzhi MA","doi":"10.1016/S1876-3804(25)60572-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The formation water sample in oil and gas fields may be polluted in processes of testing, trial production, collection, storage, transportation and analysis, making the properties of formation water not be reflected truly. This paper discusses identification methods and the data credibility evaluation method for formation water in oil and gas fields of petroliferous basins within China. The results of the study show that: (1) the identification methods of formation water include the basic methods of single factors such as physical characteristics, water composition characteristics, water type characteristics, and characteristic coefficients, as well as the comprehensive evaluation method of data credibility proposed on this basis, which mainly relies on the correlation analysis sodium chloride coefficient (<em>r</em><sub>Na</sub>/<em>r</em><sub>Cl</sub>) and desulfurization coefficient [<em>r</em><sub>SO4</sub>×100/(<em>r</em><sub>Cl</sub>+ <em>r</em><sub>SO4</sub>)] and combines geological background evaluation; (2) The basic identifying methods for formation water enable the preliminary identification of hydrochemical data and the preliminary screening of data on site, the proposed comprehensive method realizes the evaluation by classifying the CaCl<sub>2</sub>-type water into types A-I to A-VI and the NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-type water into types B-I to B-IV, so that researchers can make in-depth evaluation on the credibility of hydrochemical data and analysis of influencing factors; (3) When the basic methods are used to identify the formation water, the formation water containing anions such as CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>, OH<sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, or the formation water with the sodium chloride coefficient and desulphurization coefficient not matching the geological setting, are all invaded with surface water or polluted by working fluid; (4) When the comprehensive method is used, the data credibility of A-I, A-II, B-I and B-II formation water can be evaluated effectively and accurately only if the geological setting analysis in respect of the factors such as formation environment, sampling conditions, condensate water, acid fluid, leaching of ancient weathering crust, and ancient atmospheric fresh water, is combined, although such formation water is believed with high credibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":67426,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Exploration and Development","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 361-376"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data credibility evaluation method for formation water in oil and gas fields and its influencing factors\",\"authors\":\"Wei LI,&nbsp;Wuren XIE,&nbsp;Saijun WU,&nbsp;Yanhua SHUAI,&nbsp;Xingzhi MA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1876-3804(25)60572-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The formation water sample in oil and gas fields may be polluted in processes of testing, trial production, collection, storage, transportation and analysis, making the properties of formation water not be reflected truly. This paper discusses identification methods and the data credibility evaluation method for formation water in oil and gas fields of petroliferous basins within China. The results of the study show that: (1) the identification methods of formation water include the basic methods of single factors such as physical characteristics, water composition characteristics, water type characteristics, and characteristic coefficients, as well as the comprehensive evaluation method of data credibility proposed on this basis, which mainly relies on the correlation analysis sodium chloride coefficient (<em>r</em><sub>Na</sub>/<em>r</em><sub>Cl</sub>) and desulfurization coefficient [<em>r</em><sub>SO4</sub>×100/(<em>r</em><sub>Cl</sub>+ <em>r</em><sub>SO4</sub>)] and combines geological background evaluation; (2) The basic identifying methods for formation water enable the preliminary identification of hydrochemical data and the preliminary screening of data on site, the proposed comprehensive method realizes the evaluation by classifying the CaCl<sub>2</sub>-type water into types A-I to A-VI and the NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-type water into types B-I to B-IV, so that researchers can make in-depth evaluation on the credibility of hydrochemical data and analysis of influencing factors; (3) When the basic methods are used to identify the formation water, the formation water containing anions such as CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>, OH<sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, or the formation water with the sodium chloride coefficient and desulphurization coefficient not matching the geological setting, are all invaded with surface water or polluted by working fluid; (4) When the comprehensive method is used, the data credibility of A-I, A-II, B-I and B-II formation water can be evaluated effectively and accurately only if the geological setting analysis in respect of the factors such as formation environment, sampling conditions, condensate water, acid fluid, leaching of ancient weathering crust, and ancient atmospheric fresh water, is combined, although such formation water is believed with high credibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":67426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Exploration and Development\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 361-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Exploration and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380425605726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Exploration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380425605726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油气田地层水样在测试、试采、采集、储运、分析等过程中可能受到污染,使地层水的性质不能真实反映。探讨了中国含油气盆地油气田地层水的识别方法和数据可信度评价方法。研究结果表明:(1)地层水识别方法包括物理特征、水成分特征、水类型特征、特征系数等单因素的基本方法,以及在此基础上提出的数据可信度综合评价方法;主要依靠相关性分析氯化钠系数(rNa/rCl)和脱硫系数[rSO4×100/(rCl+ rSO4)],并结合地质背景评价;(2)地层水的基本识别方法能够对水化学数据进行初步识别和现场数据的初步筛选,本文提出的综合方法通过将cacl2型水分类为A-I ~ A-VI型,将nahco3型水分类为B-I ~ B-IV型来实现评价,使研究人员能够对水化学数据的可信度进行深入评价和影响因素分析;(3)采用基本方法识别地层水时,含有CO32-、OH-、NO3-等阴离子的地层水,或氯化钠系数、脱硫系数与地质背景不匹配的地层水均被地表水侵入或被工作流体污染;(4)采用综合评价方法时,只有结合地层环境、取样条件、凝结水、酸性流体、古风化壳淋滤、古大气淡水等因素的地质背景分析,才能有效、准确地评价A-I、A-II、B-I、B-II地层水的数据可信度,虽然认为该地层水具有较高的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data credibility evaluation method for formation water in oil and gas fields and its influencing factors
The formation water sample in oil and gas fields may be polluted in processes of testing, trial production, collection, storage, transportation and analysis, making the properties of formation water not be reflected truly. This paper discusses identification methods and the data credibility evaluation method for formation water in oil and gas fields of petroliferous basins within China. The results of the study show that: (1) the identification methods of formation water include the basic methods of single factors such as physical characteristics, water composition characteristics, water type characteristics, and characteristic coefficients, as well as the comprehensive evaluation method of data credibility proposed on this basis, which mainly relies on the correlation analysis sodium chloride coefficient (rNa/rCl) and desulfurization coefficient [rSO4×100/(rCl+ rSO4)] and combines geological background evaluation; (2) The basic identifying methods for formation water enable the preliminary identification of hydrochemical data and the preliminary screening of data on site, the proposed comprehensive method realizes the evaluation by classifying the CaCl2-type water into types A-I to A-VI and the NaHCO3-type water into types B-I to B-IV, so that researchers can make in-depth evaluation on the credibility of hydrochemical data and analysis of influencing factors; (3) When the basic methods are used to identify the formation water, the formation water containing anions such as CO32-, OH- and NO3-, or the formation water with the sodium chloride coefficient and desulphurization coefficient not matching the geological setting, are all invaded with surface water or polluted by working fluid; (4) When the comprehensive method is used, the data credibility of A-I, A-II, B-I and B-II formation water can be evaluated effectively and accurately only if the geological setting analysis in respect of the factors such as formation environment, sampling conditions, condensate water, acid fluid, leaching of ancient weathering crust, and ancient atmospheric fresh water, is combined, although such formation water is believed with high credibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
473
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信