抽取和cnn去噪[18F]-FDG PET/CT扫描图像的肺部病变可检出性:一项基于观察者的肺癌筛查研究

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige
{"title":"抽取和cnn去噪[18F]-FDG PET/CT扫描图像的肺部病变可检出性:一项基于观察者的肺癌筛查研究","authors":"Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.038).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung lesion detectability on images obtained from decimated and CNN-based denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan: an observer-based study for lung-cancer screening\",\"authors\":\"Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.038).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估肺癌筛查的可行性,我们模拟低剂量卷积神经网络(CNN)去噪[18F]-FDG PET/CT重建,分析肺部病变的可检出性。方法回顾性分析肺部病变,并对[18F]-FDG PET/CT进行全统计分析。根据总数的不同百分比水平,模拟了减少计数的PET数据。使用经过训练的CNN算法对全统计和约简统计数据集进行去噪,以重建全统计PET。两位读者对每个病变的可检测性评分从3到0。在完全统计和不同抽取水平(100%、30%、5%、2%、1%)和不去噪的情况下,比较所得的可检测性评分和定量测量结果。结果我们分析了588例重建手术中49例患者的141个肺部病变。二值化后的肺病变恶性评分与未去噪的10%抽取相比有显著差异(p <;0.029)和5%的抽取和去噪(p <;0.001)。与完全统计相比,可检测性评分分布与未去噪的2%抽取有显著差异(p <;0.001)和5%的抽取和去噪(p <;0.001)。在相同的抽取水平上,去噪或不去噪的可检测性得分在抽取10%、2%和1%时差异显著(p <;0.019);二分类得分无显著差异。去噪显著增加了诊断置信度高的肺部病变评分比例(3分和0分)(p <;0.038)。结论不去噪时肺病变的检出率可达注射活动性的30%,去噪后可达10%。这些结果支持了低活性[18F]-FDG PET/CT作为肺部病变检测的潜在工具的可行性。进一步的研究需要将这种方法与低剂量CT在筛查方面进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung lesion detectability on images obtained from decimated and CNN-based denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan: an observer-based study for lung-cancer screening

Purpose

To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.

Methods

Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.

Results

We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (p < 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (p < 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (p < 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (p < 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (p < 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (p < 0.038).

Conclusion

Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [18F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信