Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige
{"title":"抽取和cnn去噪[18F]-FDG PET/CT扫描图像的肺部病变可检出性:一项基于观察者的肺癌筛查研究","authors":"Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (<i>p</i> < 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (<i>p</i> < 0.038).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung lesion detectability on images obtained from decimated and CNN-based denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan: an observer-based study for lung-cancer screening\",\"authors\":\"Daphné Faist, Silvano Gnesin, Siria Medici, Alysée Khan, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Adrien Depeursinge, Maurizio Conti, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, John O. Prior, Mario Jreige\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (<i>p</i> < 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (<i>p</i> < 0.038).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07259-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung lesion detectability on images obtained from decimated and CNN-based denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan: an observer-based study for lung-cancer screening
Purpose
To assess feasibility of lung cancer screening, we analysed lung lesion detectability simulating low-dose and convolutional neural network (CNN) denoised [18F]-FDG PET/CT reconstructions.
Methods
Retrospectively, we analysed lung lesions on full statistics and decimated [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Reduced count PET data were emulated according to various percentage levels of total. Full and reduced statistics datasets were denoised using a CNN algorithm trained to recreate full statistics PET. Two readers assessed a detectability score from 3 to 0 for each lesion. The resulting detectability score and quantitative measurements were compared between full statistics and the different decimation levels (100%, 30%, 5%, 2%, 1%) with and without denoising.
Results
We analysed 141 lung lesions from 49 patients across 588 reconstructions. The dichotomised lung lesion malignancy score was significantly different from 10% decimation without denoising (p < 0.029) and from 5% decimation with denoising (p < 0.001). Compared to full statistics, detectability score distribution differed significantly from 2% decimation without denoising (p < 0.001) and from 5% decimation with denoising (p < 0.001). Detectability scores at same decimation levels with or without denoising differed significantly at 10%, 2%, and 1% decimation (p < 0.019); dichotomised scores did not differ significantly. Denoising significantly increased the proportion of lung lesion scores with a high diagnostic confidence (3 and 0) (p < 0.038).
Conclusion
Lung lesion detectability was preserved down to 30% of injected activity without denoising and to 10% with denoising. These results support the feasibility of reduced-activity [18F]-FDG PET/CT as a potential tool for lung lesion detection. Further studies are warranted to compare this approach with low-dose CT in screening settings.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.