社区无导管试验服务的服务评价

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Leila Zaker, Oonagh Carson
{"title":"社区无导管试验服务的服务评价","authors":"Leila Zaker,&nbsp;Oonagh Carson","doi":"10.1111/ijun.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This Service Evaluation of a Trial Without a Catheter service (TWOC) provided by a community Bladder and Bowel Service focuses on exploring and identifying areas for improvement within the service. The evaluation provides insight into the effectiveness of a Trial Without a Catheter service in the community and has examined the impact of this service provision on patients' quality of care by seeking patients' overall satisfaction as service users. A quantitative design has been used for data collection, complemented by some qualitative questions. An evaluation questionnaire was designed and distributed to 56 participants to investigate the views of service users. Using Likert scaling statements, with the option to expand the comment text box, the strengths of patients' feelings and satisfactions towards the Trial Without a Catheter service were assessed. The mean age of the participants was 65–84 (range, 25 to 85+) years. There were 24 male and 7 female patients, with urinary retention being the most frequently stated reason for catheterisation. In relation to the experience, in total, 90% of participants who responded either agreed or strongly agreed that the preferred location to have the procedure carried out was at home. Themes raised in relation to the experience were communication, patient's level of stress and anxiety and the impact of Trial Without a Catheter procedure on patients' quality of life. In relation to satisfaction, 100% of the participants stated that they strongly agreed or agreed to being satisfied with the overall care they received from the Trial Without a Catheter service. This Service Evaluation has revealed a high level of patient satisfaction with the Trial Without a Catheter service being performed at home; however, the findings indicate areas of potential improvement regarding communication prior to the procedure. The contribution of the bladder and bowel service has led to improved patients' outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service Evaluation of Trial Without Catheter Service Delivered in the Community Setting\",\"authors\":\"Leila Zaker,&nbsp;Oonagh Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This Service Evaluation of a Trial Without a Catheter service (TWOC) provided by a community Bladder and Bowel Service focuses on exploring and identifying areas for improvement within the service. The evaluation provides insight into the effectiveness of a Trial Without a Catheter service in the community and has examined the impact of this service provision on patients' quality of care by seeking patients' overall satisfaction as service users. A quantitative design has been used for data collection, complemented by some qualitative questions. An evaluation questionnaire was designed and distributed to 56 participants to investigate the views of service users. Using Likert scaling statements, with the option to expand the comment text box, the strengths of patients' feelings and satisfactions towards the Trial Without a Catheter service were assessed. The mean age of the participants was 65–84 (range, 25 to 85+) years. There were 24 male and 7 female patients, with urinary retention being the most frequently stated reason for catheterisation. In relation to the experience, in total, 90% of participants who responded either agreed or strongly agreed that the preferred location to have the procedure carried out was at home. Themes raised in relation to the experience were communication, patient's level of stress and anxiety and the impact of Trial Without a Catheter procedure on patients' quality of life. In relation to satisfaction, 100% of the participants stated that they strongly agreed or agreed to being satisfied with the overall care they received from the Trial Without a Catheter service. This Service Evaluation has revealed a high level of patient satisfaction with the Trial Without a Catheter service being performed at home; however, the findings indicate areas of potential improvement regarding communication prior to the procedure. The contribution of the bladder and bowel service has led to improved patients' outcomes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项由社区膀胱和肠道服务中心提供的无导管试验服务评估(TWOC)的重点是探索和确定服务中需要改进的领域。该评估深入了解了无导管试验服务在社区中的有效性,并通过寻求患者作为服务使用者的总体满意度来检查该服务提供对患者护理质量的影响。数据收集采用了定量设计,并辅以一些定性问题。设计了一份评价问卷,分发给56名参与者,以调查服务使用者的意见。使用李克特量表,并可选择扩展评论文本框,评估患者对无导管试验服务的感受和满意度。参与者的平均年龄为65-84岁(范围为25至85岁以上)。有24名男性和7名女性患者,尿潴留是最常见的导尿原因。就经验而言,总的来说,90%的参与者同意或强烈同意在家里进行手术的首选地点。与体验相关的主题是沟通,患者的压力和焦虑水平以及无导管试验程序对患者生活质量的影响。关于满意度,100%的参与者表示他们强烈同意或同意对他们从无导管试验服务中获得的整体护理感到满意。这项服务评估显示,患者对在家中进行无导管试验服务的满意度很高;然而,调查结果表明,在手术前的沟通方面存在潜在的改进。膀胱和肠道服务的贡献导致了患者预后的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Service Evaluation of Trial Without Catheter Service Delivered in the Community Setting

This Service Evaluation of a Trial Without a Catheter service (TWOC) provided by a community Bladder and Bowel Service focuses on exploring and identifying areas for improvement within the service. The evaluation provides insight into the effectiveness of a Trial Without a Catheter service in the community and has examined the impact of this service provision on patients' quality of care by seeking patients' overall satisfaction as service users. A quantitative design has been used for data collection, complemented by some qualitative questions. An evaluation questionnaire was designed and distributed to 56 participants to investigate the views of service users. Using Likert scaling statements, with the option to expand the comment text box, the strengths of patients' feelings and satisfactions towards the Trial Without a Catheter service were assessed. The mean age of the participants was 65–84 (range, 25 to 85+) years. There were 24 male and 7 female patients, with urinary retention being the most frequently stated reason for catheterisation. In relation to the experience, in total, 90% of participants who responded either agreed or strongly agreed that the preferred location to have the procedure carried out was at home. Themes raised in relation to the experience were communication, patient's level of stress and anxiety and the impact of Trial Without a Catheter procedure on patients' quality of life. In relation to satisfaction, 100% of the participants stated that they strongly agreed or agreed to being satisfied with the overall care they received from the Trial Without a Catheter service. This Service Evaluation has revealed a high level of patient satisfaction with the Trial Without a Catheter service being performed at home; however, the findings indicate areas of potential improvement regarding communication prior to the procedure. The contribution of the bladder and bowel service has led to improved patients' outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信